Comparison of 5.0T and 3.0T Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
5TbpMRI
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare 5.0T and 3.0T biparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The main aims of this study are:
- Compare the diagnostic efficacy of 5.0TbpMRI and 3.0TbpMRI for prostate cancer. Preliminarily evaluate the value of 5.0TbpMRI in diagnosing prostate cancer.
- Compare and analyze the accuracy of 5.0TbpMRI and 3.0TbpMRI in determining the T stage of prostate cancer. Preliminary evaluation of the value of 5.0TbpMRI in determining the tumor stage of prostate cancer. The data of participants was collected prospectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
February 11, 2025
February 1, 2025
2 years
September 21, 2024
February 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the diagnostic efficacy of 5.0TbpMRI and 3.0TbpMRI for prostate cancer.
Definitions: csPCa, Gleason score ≥ 3+4, ISUP grade ≥ 2; agPCa, Gleason score ≥ 3+3, ISUP grade ≥ 1. Evaluation indexes: ROC curves and AUC value (95%CI) , Sensetivity, Specificity, Positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of the reliability (repeatability) of the diagnostic test.
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Comparative analysis of the accuracy of 5.0TbpMRI and 3.0TbpMRI in determining the stage of prostate cancer
through study completion, an average of 2 months
Study Arms (1)
Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergo 5.0T and 3.0T bpMRI
All enrolled patients need to undergo 5.0TbpMRI and 3.0TbpMRI (within one month). The magnetic resonance imaging sequences mainly include T1WI, multi-plane T2WI and multi-b-value DWI images.
Interventions
All patients were required to underwent transperineal prostate biopsy (Systemetic + Targeted) and have corresponding pathological diagnosis results.
Eligibility Criteria
This study mainly screened patients who need to complete mainly included serum PSA test, digital rectal examination, and 3.0TbpMRI and with indications of prostate biopsy. An informed consent conversation was conducted with the patient. After the patient fully understood the content of the study and signed the informed consent form, the researcher guided and arranged the 5.0TbpMRI examination throughout the process. All patients should complete the prostate biopsy according to the routine diagnosis and treatment process. The pathological diagnosis results of the prostate biopsy are the diagnostic gold standard of this study. The accuracy of 3.0TbpMRI and 5.0TbpMRI in preoperative prostate cancer tumor staging based on the final pathological results of radical prostatectomy.
You may qualify if:
- The patient has at least one indication for prostate biopsy (Chinese expert consensus on prostate biopsy (2022 edition) );
- The primary prostate cancer has no other cancer history;
- The 3.0TbpMRI examination was completed, and the images were clear and accessible;
- The 5.0TbpMRI examination was further completed, and the images were clear and accessible;
- The patient fully understands the relevant content of the study and voluntarily signs the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has contraindications to MRI examination, such as metal plates and heart stents in the body;
- The patient does not have an indication for prostate biopsy or refuses biopsy;
- The patient has contraindications to prostate biopsy;
- T MRI considers that the patient has multiple lymph node or bone metastases;
- The patient has undergone other prostatic surgery in the past;
- The patient is unable to cooperate, has communication barriers, or refuses to sign the informed consent form.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC
Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jun Xiao, M.D.
The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2024
First Posted
September 25, 2024
Study Start
October 8, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
February 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02