Comparison of ESP and SPSIP Blocks in Breast Surgery
A Comparative Analysis of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block and Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) Block in Breast Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the efficacy of the ESP and SPSIP blocks in managing postoperative pain following breast surgery. Breast surgery, particularly after oncological and reconstructive procedures, often leads to significant postoperative pain. Effective pain control is crucial for accelerating recovery, reducing the risk of complications, and facilitating early discharge. Both ESP and SPSIP blocks involve the administration of local anesthetics into fascial plane spaces to achieve peripheral nerve blockade and control pain. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of these blocks in terms of pain scores, opioid consumption, and overall patient satisfaction to determine the optimal approach for postoperative pain management in breast surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 6, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2025
CompletedFebruary 6, 2025
February 1, 2025
6 months
September 22, 2024
February 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Postoperative opioid consumption will be monitored using a Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) device, which will be connected to each patient at the end of surgery. The PCA settings will be 2 mg/cc tramadol solution, with no basal infusion, a lockout time of 20 minutes, and a 10 mg bolus dose. The total opioid (tramadol, Unit: miligram) consumption over 24 hours will be recorded, including the number of times the patient required analgesia and the number of bolus doses administered by the device.
24 hours
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where patients rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). NRS scores will be recorded to evaluate postoperative pain levels in each group at specific intervals.
24 hours postoperatively (measured at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Verbal Descriptive Nausea and Vomiting Scale
24 hours postoperatively (measured at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours)
Patient Satisfaction
24 hours postoperatively
Length of Hospital Stay
Up to 1 week postoperatively (measured in hours)
Study Arms (3)
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will include patients who undergo the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block. The ESP block will be performed under ultrasound guidance, with a needle placed on the transverse process of the vertebra to inject local anesthetic into the erector spinae muscle.
Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will include patients who undergo the Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block. The SPSIP block will be performed under ultrasound guidance, injecting local anesthetic into the plane between the serratus posterior superior muscle and the intercostal muscles.
Control Group
OTHERPatients in this group will receive standard postoperative pain management. This management will be provided through systemic analgesics (e.g., paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids if necessary) based on the patient's pain level during the postoperative period. This group will consist of patients who do not receive regional blocks, and pain management will be conducted according to the standard procedure of the surgery.
Interventions
Patients in this group will receive an Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block in addition to standard postoperative care. The ESP block will be performed under ultrasound guidance. A needle will be advanced in-plane or out-of-plane, targeting the lateral aspect of the T6 transverse process. Local anesthetic (20 to 30 ml) will be injected into the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. This block is intended to provide postoperative analgesia by blocking the transmission of pain through the thoracic spinal nerves.
Patients in this group will receive a Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block along with standard postoperative care. The SPSIP block will be performed under ultrasound guidance, where the needle is advanced between the second and third ribs towards the medial aspect of the scapula. Local anesthetic 20 to 30 ml) will be injected into the fascial plane between the serratus posterior superior muscle and the intercostal muscles after confirming needle placement with hydrodissection using 1-2 ml of saline. This block is intended to provide broad analgesia across the upper thoracic dermatomes, from C3 to T7, to control postoperative pain.
Patients in the control group will receive standard postoperative pain management without any regional block intervention. This will include the administration of systemic analgesics such as paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Opioid analgesics will be administered as needed based on the patient's pain level. Pain management will be conducted according to the standard protocol followed for breast surgery patients.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 65 years.
- Scheduled for breast surgery (Modified Radical Mastectomy with or without axillary lymph node dissection, Mastopexy, Reduction Mammoplasty).
- Preoperative anesthesia risk classified as ASA I-III according to the American -Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.
- Patients who provide informed consent for participation in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- History of coagulation disorders.
- Patients using aspirin or medically prescribed anticoagulants.
- Patients with severe systemic diseases (ASA IV).
- Patients undergoing emergency surgery.
- Patients younger than 18 or older than 65 years.
- Patients who do not develop adequate sensory block after the procedure.
- Presence of infection at the block site.
- Patients with thoracic deformities.
- Patients who decline to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Çanakkale, 17020, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The study will be conducted in a double-blind design. Neither the patients nor the researchers assessing pain management will know which treatment has been applied. The anesthesia team, present in the operating room and responsible for administering the blocks, will be aware of the group assignments, but the research team responsible for postoperative evaluations will not have access to this information. The operating room coordinator will assign each patient to the appropriate group according to a randomization list and will only share this information with the anesthesia team. The research team evaluating postoperative pain scores and collecting data will do so without knowledge of the patients\' treatment group, ensuring objectivity in the assessments through blinding.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2024
First Posted
September 25, 2024
Study Start
July 6, 2024
Primary Completion
January 6, 2025
Study Completion
January 16, 2025
Last Updated
February 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share