The Comparison of TACE-Lenvatinib With TACE-Lenvatinib-ablation for Intermediate Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
116
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Studies have shown that combination therapy of TACE with Lenvatinib could achieve better survival outcomes than TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at BCLC B stage. However, whether patients could benefit from the ablation for intermediate recurrent HCC (RHCC) is still need high quality clinical evidence. This study is to evaluate the efficacy of ablation combined with TACE and Lenvatinib for the intermediate-stage RHCC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2028
December 3, 2024
December 1, 2024
2 years
September 20, 2024
December 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression free survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from the date of inclusion to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression or death due to any cause.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Overall survival (OS)
36 month
Objective response rate (ORR)
12 months
Study Arms (2)
TACE plus Lenvatinib
ACTIVE COMPARATORTACE procedure was a 2.8-F microcatheter was super-selectively inserted into the tumor feeding artery using the coaxial technique. Then a combination of lipiodol (5-15 ml), lobaplatin (30-50 mg), and Pirarubicin (30-50 mg) was infused into each tumor. We defined technical success as complete embolization of the tumor-feeding artery resulting in no tumor staining observed by angiogram at the end of procedure. Lenvatinb (12 mg (body weight ≥60 kg) , 8 mg (body weight \<60 kg) orally once a day )
TACE plus Lenvatinib and ablation
EXPERIMENTALTACE procedure was a 2.8-F microcatheter was super-selectively inserted into the tumor feeding artery using the coaxial technique. Then a combination of lipiodol (5-15 ml), lobaplatin (30-50 mg), and Pirarubicin (30-50 mg) was infused into each tumor. We defined technical success as complete embolization of the tumor-feeding artery resulting in no tumor staining observed by angiogram at the end of procedure. Lenvatinb (12 mg (body weight ≥60 kg) , 8 mg (body weight \<60 kg) orally once a day ) Ablation (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation), ablation followed TACE within 6-8 weeks and Lenvatinib continued. Percutaneous ablation was performed by ultrasound or CT. The ablation success is evaluated by achieving an ablative margin of 0.5 cm or more than the tumor size.
Interventions
TACE procedure was a 2.8-F microcatheter was super-selectively inserted into the tumor feeding artery using the coaxial technique. Then a combination of lipiodol (5-15 ml), lobaplatin (30-50 mg), and Pirarubicin (30-50 mg) was infused into each tumor. We defined technical success as complete embolization of the tumor-feeding artery resulting in no tumor staining observed by angiogram at the end of procedure.
Ablation (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation), ablation followed TACE within 6-8 weeks and Lenvatinib continued. Percutaneous ablation was performed by ultrasound or CT. The ablation success is evaluated by achieving an ablative margin of 0.5 cm or more than the tumor size.
Lenvatinb (12 mg (body weight ≥60 kg) , 8 mg (body weight \<60 kg) orally once a day )
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years;
- RHCC diagnosed by imaging;
- intermediate-stage RHCC (two to three lesions which at least one was \>3 cm in size or more than three tumors);
- the tumor number was no more than six, and the maximum tumor diameter was ≤5 cm;
- absence of extrahepatic metastasis or macrovascular invasion;
- Child-Pugh class A or B;
- TACE as initial treatment after tumor recurrence and showed no tumor progression after TACE.
- life expectance \>3 months;
You may not qualify if:
- under 18 years or over 75 years of age;
- primary intermediate-stage HCC;
- RHCC with more than six tumors, or single RHCC
- (5) RHCC \>5cm; (6) extrahepatic metastasis; (7) macrovascular tumor thrombus;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sun Yat-sen Universitylead
- Chinese PLA General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Chinese PLA General hospital
Beijing, None Selected, 100853, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Feng Duan
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2024
First Posted
September 24, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 30, 2028
Last Updated
December 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12