the Instant Effect of Rigid and Kinesio Taping Techniques in Stroke Individuals With Foot Drop
Investigation of the Instant Effect of Rigid and Kinesio Taping Techniques on Physical Performance, Gait and Physiological Expenditure Index in Stroke Individuals With Foot Drop
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke individuals with foot drop experience poor physical performance and walking problems. Physiological energy consumption also increases due to balance and walking problems. The aim of this study is to investigate the immediate effects of rigid and kinesio taping techniques on physical performance, gait and physiological expenditure index in stroke individuals with foot drop, and also to examine whether these approaches are superior to each other. As a result of this study, it was seen that Rigid Taping and Kinesio Taping were effective in stroke individuals with foot drop. When we compared the groups, it was determined that both taping methods produced similar effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2024
CompletedMarch 11, 2025
March 1, 2025
8 months
May 29, 2024
March 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Timed up and go test
"The timed up and go measures, in seconds, the time taken by an individual to stand up from a standard arm chair (approximate seat height of 46 cm), walk a distance of 3 metres, turn, walk back to the chair and sit down again. The subject wears his regular footwear and uses his customary walking aid (none, cane, or walker). No physical assistance is given. He starts with his back against the chair, his arms resting on the chair's arms and his walking aid at hand. He is instructed that, on the word "go", he is to get up and walk at a comfortable and safe pace to a line on the floor 3 metres away, turn, return to the chair and sit down again. The subject walks through the test once before being timed in order to become familiar with the test.both taping methods produced similar effects.
3 minutes
10 metre walking test
Gait speed was based on the average of two trials of the 10-m TWT in order to reduce measurement error. Patients were instructed to walk independently from other people as fast and safely as possible, and were allowed to use a walking aid if needed. The 10 metres had to be free of obstacles and turns. program of stroke individuals with drop foot will increase the success of the treatment.
1 minutes
Sit up and chair test
ubjects began the test sitting on a 47 cm-high chair, positioned with the feet hip width apart, toes under knees and arms folded across their chest. The investigators recorded the length of time to the nearest tenth of a second it took for subjects to rise and sit back down five consecutive times without the use of their arms. Participants were given one practice trial to familiarize themselves with the procedure.kullanımında etkili olduğunu göstermektedir.
1 minutes
six minute walk test
The functional capacity of the individuals was evaluated with 6MWT. The measurements were made in line with the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society. The individuals were asked to walk in a 30-m corridor at their own walking speed for 6 min as far as possible. The individuals were allowed to stop and rest during the test, which was repeated twice every other day. The maximum 6 min walking dis- tance was recorded in meters.
10 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Kinesio Taping Group
EXPERIMENTALPersons who will undergo kinesio taping
Rigid Taping group
EXPERIMENTALPersons to whom rigid taping will be performed
Interventions
Facilitation (Functional) Technique for Tibialis Anterior Muscle: The patient sits with his leg extended. The ankle is placed in eversion and dorsi flexion. After one end of the I tape is adhered to the upper part of the Tibia, the other end is adhered to the dorsal surface of the foot with almost 100% tension. During the application, origin and insertion points are considered as the beginning and end. Then, plantar fexion is performed on the ankle and the remaining non-stick part is glued. Functional Correction Technique: Correction technique is used to ensure full contact of the foot with the ground. The subtalar joint is positioned in eversion and taping is applied starting from under the medial malleolus, without tension until the lateral outer edge of the calceneus, and then with 100% tension, continuing until 10-15 cm below the head of the fibula. No tension is applied in the last 5 cm
Talus Stabilization Taping: The affected ankle of the person to be taped was placed on a chair and asked to bring this foot to a neutral position by advancing the tibia over the foot through knee flexion while standing. Starting from the talus of the ankle, maximum tension was applied towards the medial and lateral malleolus. Inversion Lock: This lock looks like an inverted 6 when viewed from the front and is used to restrict inversion movement. After the underwrap and anchor were applied, the tape was applied starting from the outer malleolus level. It was glued on itself by proceeding diagonally in front of the foot, passing it in front of the inner malleolus, passing under the foot and in front of the outer malleolus and closing the subtalar area, and the taping was completed by making an anchor on the upper side.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kırıkkale University
Kırıkkale, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Kırıkkale University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2024
First Posted
September 23, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2023
Primary Completion
July 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03