Achieving Chronic Care equiTy by leVeraging the Telehealth Ecosystem
ACCTiVATE
2 other identifiers
interventional
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines the impact of a multi-level intervention aiming to improve telehealth access for low-income patients managing chronic health conditions, such as hypertension and diabetes. The multi-level intervention includes clinic-level practice facilitation and patient-level digital health coaching.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable diabetes
Started Nov 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
January 6, 2026
January 1, 2026
3.8 years
September 13, 2024
January 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Patient-Level Hemoglobin A1C
Change in A1C (%) will be determined by subtracting month 3, 6, and 12 A1C values from baseline A1C
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Change in Patient Portal Use
The average number of patient portal log-ins per month will be obtained from the EHR
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Digital Literacy
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Medication Adherence
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Patient Activation Measure (PAM)
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Change in Clinic-Wide Blood Pressure (mmHg)
Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, and month 24
Change in Clinic-Wide Hemoglobin A1C (average)
Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, and month 24
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Patient Intervention + Clinic Intervention
EXPERIMENTALDigital coach navigator + Clinic Intervention
Patient Usual Care + Clinic Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONUsual Care (Patient-Level) + Clinic Usual Care
Patient Intervention + Clinic Usual Care
EXPERIMENTALDigital coach navigator + Clinic Usual Care
Patient Usual Care + Clinic Intervention
EXPERIMENTALUsual Care (Patient-Level) + Clinic Intervention
Interventions
The patient-level intervention combines the role of digital health navigator and chronic disease health coach to facilitate access to devices and broadband, offer digital skills training, and provide chronic disease health coaching focused on telehealth modalities.
The clinic-level intervention includes primary care clinic support through practice facilitation that empowers team members to address racial/ethnic disparities in telehealth use through consistent review of telehealth equity data and input from clinic-specific Patient Advisory Councils (PACs).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years of age
- English or Spanish-Speaking
- Have uncontrolled diabetes defined as a listed diagnosis of diabetes with a recorded A1C ≥ 8.0% in the past two years or have uncontrolled HTN defined as a listed diagnosis of HTN and last recorded documented SBP \>140 mmHg
- At least 2 visits at a participating SFHN primary care site in the last 24 months
You may not qualify if:
- Higher than average digital literacy, defined as an Digital Healthcare Literacy Scale (DHLS) score greater than 10, as determined prior to the baseline study visit; these patients may not benefit from a digital coaching intervention.
- Presence of co-morbid conditions that would make it inappropriate to focus on telehealth chronic disease management. Conditions may include: end-stage or terminal condition with limited life expectancy and severe mental illness.
- Lack of any working phone number
- Visual or hearing impairment that precludes use of telehealth for chronic disease management
- Cognitive impairment defined by the inability to restate study goals during the consent process
- Pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFG) & SF Department of Public Health (DPH)
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
Related Publications (23)
Patrick K, Norman GJ, Davila EP, Calfas KJ, Raab F, Gottschalk M, Sallis JF, Godbole S, Covin JR. Outcomes of a 12-month technology-based intervention to promote weight loss in adolescents at risk for type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 May 1;7(3):759-70. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700322.
PMID: 23759410BACKGROUNDGrossman LV, Masterson Creber RM, Benda NC, Wright D, Vawdrey DK, Ancker JS. Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):855-870. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz023.
PMID: 30958532BACKGROUNDIrizarry T, Shoemake J, Nilsen ML, Czaja S, Beach S, DeVito Dabbs A. Patient Portals as a Tool for Health Care Engagement: A Mixed-Method Study of Older Adults With Varying Levels of Health Literacy and Prior Patient Portal Use. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 30;19(3):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7099.
PMID: 28360022BACKGROUNDTaha J, Sharit J, Czaja SJ. The impact of numeracy ability and technology skills on older adults' performance of health management tasks using a patient portal. J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Jun;33(4):416-36. doi: 10.1177/0733464812447283. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
PMID: 24781964BACKGROUNDSarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Adler NE, Nguyen R, Lopez A, Schillinger D. Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):318-21. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.006015. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
PMID: 21262921BACKGROUNDWallace LS, Angier H, Huguet N, Gaudino JA, Krist A, Dearing M, Killerby M, Marino M, DeVoe JE. Patterns of Electronic Portal Use among Vulnerable Patients in a Nationwide Practice-based Research Network: From the OCHIN Practice-based Research Network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):592-603. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.160046.
PMID: 27613792BACKGROUNDSarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Adler NE, Nguyen R, Lopez A, Schillinger D. The literacy divide: health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system-results from the diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE). J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):183-96. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499988.
PMID: 20845203BACKGROUNDLyles CR, Tieu L, Sarkar U, Kiyoi S, Sadasivaiah S, Hoskote M, Ratanawongsa N, Schillinger D. A Randomized Trial to Train Vulnerable Primary Care Patients to Use a Patient Portal. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):248-258. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180263.
PMID: 30850461BACKGROUNDRamirez V, Johnson E, Gonzalez C, Ramirez V, Rubino B, Rossetti G. Assessing the Use of Mobile Health Technology by Patients: An Observational Study in Primary Care Clinics. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Apr 19;4(2):e41. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4928.
PMID: 27095507BACKGROUNDSchickedanz A, Huang D, Lopez A, Cheung E, Lyles CR, Bodenheimer T, Sarkar U. Access, interest, and attitudes toward electronic communication for health care among patients in the medical safety net. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):914-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2329-5. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
PMID: 23423453BACKGROUNDNishii A, Campos-Castillo C, Anthony D. Disparities in patient portal access by US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMIA Open. 2022 Dec 16;5(4):ooac104. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac104. eCollection 2022 Dec.
PMID: 36540762BACKGROUNDBarbosa W, Zhou K, Waddell E, Myers T, Dorsey ER. Improving Access to Care: Telemedicine Across Medical Domains. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:463-481. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090519-093711.
PMID: 33798406BACKGROUNDMeng YY, Diamant A, Jones J, Lin W, Chen X, Wu SH, Pourat N, Roby D, Kominski GF. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Care and Impact of Vendor-Based Disease Management Programs. Diabetes Care. 2016 May;39(5):743-9. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1323. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
PMID: 26965718BACKGROUNDWisniewski H, Gorrindo T, Rauseo-Ricupero N, Hilty D, Torous J. The Role of Digital Navigators in Promoting Clinical Care and Technology Integration into Practice. Digit Biomark. 2020 Nov 26;4(Suppl 1):119-135. doi: 10.1159/000510144. eCollection 2020 Winter.
PMID: 33442585BACKGROUNDSamuels-Kalow M, Jaffe T, Zachrison K. Digital disparities: designing telemedicine systems with a health equity aim. Emerg Med J. 2021 Jun;38(6):474-476. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210896. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
PMID: 33674277BACKGROUNDUscher-Pines L, Sousa J, Jones M, Whaley C, Perrone C, McCullough C, Ober AJ. Telehealth Use Among Safety-Net Organizations in California During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. 2021 Mar 16;325(11):1106-1107. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0282.
PMID: 33528494BACKGROUNDJain V, Al Rifai M, Lee MT, Kalra A, Petersen LA, Vaughan EM, Wong ND, Ballantyne CM, Virani SS. Racial and Geographic Disparities in Internet Use in the U.S. Among Patients With Hypertension or Diabetes: Implications for Telehealth in the Era of COVID-19. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(1):e15-e17. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2016. Epub 2020 Nov 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 33139408BACKGROUNDAlkureishi MA, Choo ZY, Rahman A, Ho K, Benning-Shorb J, Lenti G, Velazquez Sanchez I, Zhu M, Shah SD, Lee WW. Digitally Disconnected: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Digital Divide and Potential Solutions. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Dec 15;8(4):e33364. doi: 10.2196/33364.
PMID: 34705664BACKGROUNDGaskin DJ, Hadley J. Population characteristics of markets of safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. J Urban Health. 1999 Sep;76(3):351-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02345673.
PMID: 12607901BACKGROUNDKhoong EC, Butler BA, Mesina O, Su G, DeFries TB, Nijagal M, Lyles CR. Patient interest in and barriers to telemedicine video visits in a multilingual urban safety-net system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):349-353. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa234.
PMID: 33164063BACKGROUNDTieu L, Schillinger D, Sarkar U, Hoskote M, Hahn KJ, Ratanawongsa N, Ralston JD, Lyles CR. Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: portals to nowhere? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e47-e54. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw098.
PMID: 27402138BACKGROUNDTieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D, Ralston JD, Ratanawongsa N, Pasick R, Lyles CR. Barriers and Facilitators to Online Portal Use Among Patients and Caregivers in a Safety Net Health Care System: A Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 3;17(12):e275. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4847.
PMID: 26681155BACKGROUNDOmomukuyo A, Ramirez A, Davis A, Velasquez A, Najmabadi AL, Kong M, Willard-Grace R, Brown W 3rd, Broderick A, Suomala K, McCulloch CE, Franco N, Sarkar U, Lyles C, Tran AS, Sharma AE, Tuot DS. Achieving Chronic Care Equity by Leveraging the Telehealth Ecosystem (ACCTIVATE): A Multilevel Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Med Res Arch. 2024 Nov;12(11):6087. doi: 10.18103/mra.v12i11.6087.
PMID: 39679006DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Delphine Tuot, MD MAS
University of California, San Francisco
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
November 4, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
January 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be made available as soon as possible or at the time of associated publication. The duration of preservation and sharing of the data will be a minimum of 5 years after the end of the funding period.
- Access Criteria
- The investigators plan to provide access to the data via Dryad. Anyone can download a dataset via Dryad in the form of a zip file. Dryad will maintain storage and access of the data for as long as it maintains scientific utility.
The proposed research will include data from approximately 690 participants recruited from primary care clinics in the San Francisco Health Network with uncontrolled diabetes (defined as glycosylated A1c greater than or equal to 8.0%). The final dataset will include self-reported demographic, telehealth engagement, and chronic disease self-management data from self-report, and additional demographic, clinical outcome, and telehealth utilization data from the electronic medical record. The data will be made available in a de-identified format in a .csv or .dta file. In addition to the IPD data set, the ACCTIVATE study team will share the data set, data dictionary, statistical analysis plan, analytic code, and final protocol with amendments