NCT06595628

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcome of both Lichnichtien tension free mesh hernioplasty of inguinal hernia and the combined modified Guarnieri Desarda technique in terms of postoperative pain, post operative complications (seroma, hematoma, wound infection), chronic inguinodenia, early recurrence and assessment of testicular vascularity and size by application of a testicular duplex and ultrasound.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2024

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 10, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

September 10, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Inguinal HerniaHernia RepairGuarnieri TechniqueDesarda TechniqueLichtenstein Hernioplasty

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative Pain Assessment

    Postoperative pain will be evaluated using the Mankoski Pain Scale (0-10). Pain scores will be recorded at different time intervals to assess immediate and long-term postoperative pain, with scores from 0 to 2 considered negligible, and scores from 3 to 10 considered significant.

    At 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Incidence of Postoperative Complications

    At 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months post-surgery.

  • Hernia Recurrence Rate

    At 6 months and 1 year post-surgery.

  • Testicular Vascularity

    At 3 months post-surgery.

Study Arms (2)

Lichtenstein Mesh-Based Repair

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this arm will undergo the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty, which involves reinforcing the inguinal canal floor using a synthetic mesh. The mesh is fixed to the inguinal ligament and internal oblique aponeurosis, minimizing tension in the repair and reducing the risk of recurrence.

Procedure: Lichtenstein Mesh-Based Hernioplasty

Combined Modified Guarnieri-Desarda Tissue-Based Repair

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will receive the combined modified Guarnieri-Desarda tissue-based repair. This approach involves reconstructing the inguinal canal without the use of synthetic mesh, using the patient's own tissues to reinforce the canal and reduce tension. The technique combines aspects of both the Guarnieri and Desarda methods, aiming to preserve the natural physiology of the inguinal canal while providing tension-free repair.

Procedure: Combined Modified Guarnieri-Desarda Tissue-Based Hernioplasty

Interventions

This is a tension-free hernioplasty procedure that uses a synthetic mesh to reinforce the inguinal canal floor. The mesh is fixed to the inguinal ligament and internal oblique aponeurosis, creating a barrier to prevent hernia recurrence. It is considered the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair and is widely used for its effectiveness in reducing recurrence rates and postoperative complications.

Lichtenstein Mesh-Based Repair

This technique combines elements of the Guarnieri and Desarda tissue-based repairs. It does not involve the use of synthetic mesh, relying instead on the patient's own tissues to reinforce the inguinal canal. The Guarnieri technique reshapes the internal ring to improve the inguinal canal's shutter mechanism, while the Desarda technique reinforces the posterior wall using the external oblique aponeurosis. This approach aims to preserve natural anatomy and minimize complications associated with mesh use.

Combined Modified Guarnieri-Desarda Tissue-Based Repair

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsOnly individuals who self-identify as male are eligible to participate.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult male patients aged 18 years or older.
  • Patients diagnosed with non-complicated inguinal hernia (both direct and indirect).
  • Patients able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18 years old.
  • Patients with complicated hernias (e.g., inflamed, obstructed, or strangulated hernias).
  • Patients with a recurrent inguinal hernia.
  • Patients with weak or thin external oblique aponeurosis (intraoperative findings).
  • Patients with a history of prior surgery in the inguinal region.
  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kasralainy

Cairo, Egypt

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Fadi F. Khalil, MSc

    Kasr El Aini Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study follows a parallel assignment model. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups: the Lichtenstein mesh-based repair group (L group) or the combined modified Guarnieri-Desarda tissue-based repair group (C group). The interventions are performed independently in each group, with outcomes compared between the two. There is no blinding in this study, and both the participants and the surgeons know which procedure is being performed (open-label study). The primary focus is on comparing the effectiveness and safety of the two surgical techniques.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Residend of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2024

First Posted

September 19, 2024

Study Start

October 10, 2024

Primary Completion

October 1, 2025

Study Completion

October 1, 2025

Last Updated

March 14, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) including demographic information, surgical outcomes, and follow-up data (postoperative pain scores, complications, testicular vascularity and size, and hernia recurrence rates) will be made available. Data will be shared with researchers upon reasonable request for the purpose of secondary analysis. Access to the data will be granted following the publication of the study results and will be available for up to 5 years after study completion. Participants' confidentiality will be protected, and any shared data will be anonymized.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Data will be available for a period of 5 years after the study is completed.
Access Criteria
Who: Qualified researchers with a scientifically sound proposal will be able to access the individual participant data (IPD) and supporting information. What: Researchers will be able to access de-identified IPD, including demographic data, surgical outcomes, follow-up data (e.g., pain scores, complications, testicular vascularity, and hernia recurrence), and supporting documents such as the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form. How: Researchers must submit a formal request to the corresponding author detailing their research proposal, the objectives of the secondary analysis, and how the data will be used. Requests will be evaluated by the study investigators. If approved, data will be shared via a secure, password-protected data-sharing platform, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations.

Locations