Early Support After Exposure to Trauma
EASE
1 other identifier
interventional
360
1 country
29
Brief Summary
A significant proportion of people who are exposed to traumatic events suffer from post-traumatic sequelae, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Indicated preventive interventions soon after trauma could be appropriate. Yet, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of such interventions. Moreover, no evidence-based preventive interventions are readily available for victims in the aftermath of crises and disasters in Norway. Condensed Internet-delivered Prolonged Exposure (CIPE) is a preventive intervention designed for victims with symptoms of PTSD (PTSS) approximately one month after a traumatic event. The treatment is an internet-delivered, therapist assisted intervention, based on principles from Prolonged Exposure. CIPE has proven to be feasible, safe, and effective in previous studies. This study aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CIPE in the context of psychosocial crisis services in Norwegian municipalities. Hypotheses Effectiveness H1 Participants receiving CIPE + treatment as usual (TAU) will have significantly less PTSS than participants receiving TAU at 6 weeks post T1, and at 6-, and 12- months after the traumatic incident. H2 Significantly fewer participants receiving CIPE+TAU will fulfill the criteria for PTSD compared to participants receiving TAU, at 6- and 12-months post trauma. H3 Participants receiving CIPE+TAU will have significantly less symptoms of depression and insomnia than participants receiving TAU at 6 weeks post T1, and at 6-, and 12- months after the traumatic incident. H4 Participants in the CIPE+TAU-condition will report significantly higher treatment satisfaction at post-treatment, compared to those in the TAU-condition. H5 Participants with traumatic loss receiving CIPE+TAU will have significantly less symptoms of prolonged grief than such participants receiving TAU 12 months after the loss. Cost-effectiveness H6 Fewer participants in the CIPE+TAU-condition will be referred to second-tier specialty mental health services, and more will achieve improved quality of life within the first year after the traumatic incident, compared to participants in the TAU-condition. H7 The CIPE+TAU implementation is more cost-effective compared to the TAU in the short run and may even dominate TAU in the long run (i.e., more effective and less costly).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
March 23, 2026
March 1, 2026
3.3 years
August 29, 2024
March 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version)
20-item questionnaire that measures DSM-5-specified symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Items are rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") Likert type scale. The PCL-5 has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in various trauma populations. This study will administer a Norwegian version of the PCL-5. Recall period: one month.
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
Secondary Outcomes (18)
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version)
6 months follow-up
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version)
12 months follow-up
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Norwegian version)
6-months follow-up
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Norwegian version)
12-months follow-up
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Norwegian version)
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (18)
Mild-moderate adverse events questionnaire
Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma)
Self-reported work absence and use of health services
Post-treatment (10 weeks after trauma)
Self-reported work absence and use of health services
6-months follow-up
- +15 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE) + Treatment-as-usual (TAU)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this condition will receive Treatment-as-usual (TAU) from psychosocial crisis teams throughout the entire participation period (1 year post trauma), in addition to CIPE as an add-on lasting for six weeks after randomization (T1; randomization from 4 to 7 weeks, dependent on when the participant is recruited). In CIPE, participants are encouraged to have daily contact with their therapist through a secured email system within the platform. Therapists are also available for phone sessions. Total therapist contact for each participant is generally less than 60 minutes during the whole program. Participants are expected to work on intervention tasks for six hours each week and to complete the intervention in three weeks. The intervention is delivered by psychosocial crisis teams' staff in 14 municipalities in the central-eastern part of Norway. Content, frequency, and quantity of the CIPE+TAU-condition will be measured.
Treatment-as-usual (TAU) only
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this condition will receive Treatment-as-usual (TAU) throughout the entire participation period (1 year post trauma). The TAU-condition is delivered by the same municipality psychosocial crisis teams as the Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE) +TAU arm. The crisis teams follow a national guideline (The Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2016), recommending proactive contact with victims, screening for psychosocial difficulties, and offering interventions to individuals with significant levels of trauma-related problems. Most municipalities organize interdisciplinary crisis services consisting of physicians, police, priests, nurses, and psychologists who receive referrals from emergency services after a traumatic event. There is currently considerable heterogeneity in the frequenzy and quantity of intervention across municipalities.
Interventions
There is currently considerable heterogeneity regarding the interventional principles applied in the Treatment-as-usual (TAU) condition across municipal crisis teams. The national guidelines (The Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2016), recommends several interventional principles such as psychological first aid (PFA), psychoeducation regarding crisis reactions/symptoms of acute stress, normalization of such reactions, activation of social support, and practical assistance.
'Condensed Internet-delivered Prolonged Exposure' (CIPE) is an intervention designed for victims with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) soon after a traumatic incident. CIPE is a therapist-supported intervention that consists of four modules delivered over the internet. Central CIPE-interventions include psychoeducation of normal post-traumatic reactions, in-vivo exposure, imaginary exposure, and a breathing exercise.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Receives support from a municipal crisis team
- Exposure to a traumatic event (as defined by criteria A for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the DSM-5) within the last seven weeks before randomization
- A total score of 10 or above on the PTSD Symptom Checklist-5 at the time of randomization
- Age 16 or above
- Written informed consent
- Writes and speaks English and/or Norwegian
You may not qualify if:
- Severe psychopathology in need of specialized health care (e.g., psychotic symptoms, or high suicide risk) or substance dependence syndrome in need of specialized health care
- Known or evident severe cognitive impairment
- Ongoing traumatization, violence, or threats
- Unstable dose of psychotropic medication two weeks prior to randomization
- Concurrent therapy elsewhere before randomization
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (29)
Asker municipality - Psychosocial crisis team
Asker, Asker, 1384, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Indre Østfold kommune
Askim, Askim, 1830, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, St Hanshaugen
Oslo, Oslo County, 0170, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Ullern
Oslo, Oslo County, 0377, Norway
Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies
Oslo, Oslo County, 0484, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Nordre Aker
Oslo, Oslo County, 0484, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Østensjø
Oslo, Oslo County, 0694, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Vestre Aker
Oslo, Oslo County, 0754, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Grorud
Oslo, Oslo County, 0954, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Alna
Oslo, Oslo County, 1051, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Søndre Nordstrand
Oslo, Oslo County, 1203, Norway
Aurskog-Høland - Psychosocial crisis team
Bjørkelangen, Norway
Fredrikstad municipality - Psychosocial Crisis team
Fredrikstad, Norway
Gjøvik municipality - psychosocial crisis team
Gjøvik, Norway
Halden Municipality - psychosocial crisis team
Halden, Norway
Hamar Municipality - psychosocial crisis team
Hamar, Norway
Søndre Land municipality - psychosocial crisis team
Hov, Norway
Ullensaker municipality - psychosocial crisis team
Jessheim, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Bjerke
Oslo, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Frogner
Oslo, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, gamle Oslo
Oslo, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Grünerløkka
Oslo, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Nordstrand
Oslo, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Sagene
Oslo, Norway
Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Stovner
Oslo, Norway
Psychosocial emergency service - Oslo emergency room
Oslo, Norway
Ringsaker municipality - Psychosocial crisis team
Ringsaker, Norway
Gjerdrum - psychosocial crisis team
Sørum, Norway
Nannestad municipality - psychosocial crisis team
Teigebyen, Norway
Related Publications (18)
Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
PMID: 26606250BACKGROUNDMekawi Y, Silverstein MW, Walker A, Ishiekwene M, Carter S, Michopoulos V, Stevens JS, Powers A. Examining the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 in a black community sample using item response theory. J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Apr;87:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102555. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
PMID: 35338915BACKGROUNDSveen J, Bondjers K, Willebrand M. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: a pilot study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2016 Apr 19;7:30165. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.30165. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27098450BACKGROUNDMarx BP, Lee DJ, Norman SB, Bovin MJ, Sloan DM, Weathers FW, Keane TM, Schnurr PP. Reliable and clinically significant change in the clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among male veterans. Psychol Assess. 2022 Feb;34(2):197-203. doi: 10.1037/pas0001098. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
PMID: 34941354BACKGROUNDWeathers FW, Bovin MJ, Lee DJ, Sloan DM, Schnurr PP, Kaloupek DG, Keane TM, Marx BP. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):383-395. doi: 10.1037/pas0000486. Epub 2017 May 11.
PMID: 28493729BACKGROUNDBrattmyr M, Lindberg MS, Solem S, Hjemdal O, Havnen A. Factor structure, measurement invariance, and concurrent validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale-7 in a Norwegian psychiatric outpatient sample. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04101-z.
PMID: 35818021BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDWisting L, Johnson SU, Bulik CM, Andreassen OA, Ro O, Bang L. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a large female sample of adults with and without eating disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03013-0.
PMID: 33402149BACKGROUNDBastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001 Jul;2(4):297-307. doi: 10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4.
PMID: 11438246BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Lichstein KL, Morin CM. Recommendations for a standard research assessment of insomnia. Sleep. 2006 Sep;29(9):1155-73. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.9.1155.
PMID: 17040003BACKGROUNDMorin CM, Belleville G, Belanger L, Ivers H. The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011 May 1;34(5):601-8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.5.601.
PMID: 21532953BACKGROUNDPedersen H, Havnen A, Brattmyr M, Attkisson CC, Lara-Cabrera ML. A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8.
PMID: 36316661BACKGROUNDFeng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):647-673. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
PMID: 33284428BACKGROUNDKeetharuth AD, Brazier J, Connell J, Bjorner JB, Carlton J, Taylor Buck E, Ricketts T, McKendrick K, Browne J, Croudace T, Barkham M. Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;212(1):42-49. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.10.
PMID: 29433611BACKGROUNDLenferink LIM, Eisma MC, Smid GE, de Keijser J, Boelen PA. Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+). Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
PMID: 34700189BACKGROUNDBragesjo M, Arnberg FK, Olofsdotter Lauri K, Aspvall K, Sarnholm J, Andersson E. Condensed Internet-delivered prolonged exposure provided soon after trauma: a randomised trial. Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):1989-1998. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003706. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
PMID: 37310324BACKGROUNDAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
BACKGROUNDLassen ER, Birkeland MS, Egeland K, Stene LE, Brodersen D, Ekornas B, Reinholdt NP, Kjerstad E, Lamu AN, Aarons GA, Crable EL, Bragesjo M, Baekkelund H. Early Support after Exposure to Trauma (EASE): protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of an internet-based intervention for PTSD prevention. Trials. 2026 Feb 5;27(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09502-z.
PMID: 41645255DERIVED
Related Links
- The Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2016). National guidelines for psychosocial support in the aftermath of crises and catastrophes
- Heir, T. (2014). PCL-5. Norwegian centre for violence and traumatic stress studies.
- Bækkelund, H., Aareskjold, J., \& Endsjø, M. (2015). KLINIKERADMINISTRERT PTSD-SKALA FOR DSM-5: Versjon for vurdering av siste måned. Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harald Bækkelund, PhD
Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Investigator: senior statistician will be blinded for condition. Junior statistician will not, due to practical barriers (double role as the study coordinator). The person responsible for randomization will be blinded for the outcome of the screening (T0) and baseline (T1) assessments. Outcome assessors: graduate psychology students who will perform the clinical interviews will be blinded for condition.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
September 13, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
March 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Beginning six months and ending 5 years following article production.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers with a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to PI.
Anonymized individual participant outcome- and background data, and code generated from the project, will be made available upon reasonable request, to the degree permitted by ethical board approval.