Efficacy of Different Stretching Techniques on Hamstring Muscle Tightness in IT Professionals
Comparative Effectiveness of Static Stretching Versus Myofascial Release on Hamstring Muscle Tightness in IT Professionals: A Randomized Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Brief Summary This clinical trial aims to learn if static stretching and myofascial release work to improve hamstring muscle tightness and lower limb functional ability among IT professionals. It will also learn about the superiority of one maneuver over another. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does static stretching and myofascial release work to improve hamstring muscle tightness and lower limb functional ability among IT professionals?
- Which stretching maneuver is more effective in reducing hamstring muscle tightness and improving the lower limb functional ability among IT professionals? Researchers will compare static stretching to myofascial release to see if both work equally or are superior to each other in reducing hamstring muscle tightness and improving lower limb functional ability among IT professionals. Participants will:
- Both groups received an application of hot packs for 20-25mins at the posterior aspect of the thigh.
- In addition, group 1 performed static stretching of the hamstring muscles for thirty seconds, with a thirty-second gap, repeating the same maneuver three times/day for five days/week for three weeks.
- Group 2 received a myofascial release. This maneuver involves the proper positioning of the practitioner\'s hands on both sides of the hamstrings, pulling them in opposite directions with firm pressure, and holding the stretch for three to five minutes each stretch, completing five to seven stretches per session with a gap of two minutes between each stretch, and continued five sessions per week for three weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
2 months
September 4, 2024
September 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Active knee extension range of motion (AKE-ROM)
Hamstring muscle tightness was assessed by active knee extension ROM using a standard full-circle goniometer. The knee angle should be between 80-90 degrees. If the range is below 80 degrees, then that subject has a tight hamstring.
3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS)
3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
SS Group
EXPERIMENTALSS group received a static stretching on the hamstring muscle
MFR Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe MFR group received a myofascial release on the hamstring muscle
Interventions
The SS group received static stretching, which was applied with gentle and firm pressure while pulling opposite the hamstring muscle contraction.
Myofascial release is applied with cross-handed stretches over hamstring muscle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- IT professionals
- males and females)
- aged between 30 and 45 years
- working in passive roles for at least 6 hours a day, and
- reported symptoms of hamstring muscle tightness such as decreased flexibility and discomfort during prolonged sitting, and found positive active knee extension test.
You may not qualify if:
- History of musculoskeletal injuries or neurological disorders affecting lower limb function, and
- showed non-cooperation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Saud University
Riyadh, Ar-Riyadh, 10219, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AMIR IQBAL, MPT
King Saud University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
January 21, 2020
Primary Completion
March 15, 2020
Study Completion
December 23, 2020
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share