NCT06578897

Brief Summary

GMK Revision Knee System is part of the Medacta GMK® (Global Medacta Knee) Total Knee System and is indicated when a higher level of varus/valgus constraint is needed. The external shape of the GMK® Revision femoral component is identical to that of GMK® Primary. The GMK® Revision differs from GMK® Primary by three important design features: i. The addition of a box which allows a stem to be inserted into the femoral canal; ii. The addition of screw lugs so that augments can be placed on the distal and posterior resections, and; iii. The box which also allows various levels of constraint to be added to the polyethylene insert. The tibial component offers the ability to place augments. Indications for Use: The GMK® Total Knee System is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components. This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:

  • Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis
  • Avascular necrosis of femoral condyle
  • Post traumatic loss of joint configuration
  • Primary implantation failure
  • Ligamentous Instability Tibial augments are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement. In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the tibial and on the femoral component. GMK® Revision femoral components are manufactured of Cobalt Chromium Molybdenum (CoCrMo) according to ISO 5832-4:1996, Implants for Surgery- Metallic materials - Part 4: Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Casting Alloy, the same as the GMK® Primary femoral components. They have an asymmetric patellar groove (left and right) with different radii of curvature in coronal plane as well as non-parallel anterior and posterior cuts (wedge shape). The GMK® Revision posterior stabilized femoral components are designed for use without cruciate ligaments when additional stability is required to prevent subluxation of the femur to the tibia in flexion, same as the GMK® Primary femoral components. In case of severe bone loss, the tibial cones and femoral cones may be used to respectively reinforce the proximal tibia cavity and the distal femoral cavity, providing structural support and load redistribution on the remaining bone. Being an integral part of revision TKA for patients with such bone loss, the clinical outcomes for revision TKAs using the cone components are important for the knowledge regarding performance and survivorship of the Revision TKA as a whole.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
118

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 13, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 21, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 13, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 29, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

August 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones

    Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item patient-reported PRO specifically designed and developed to assess function and pain after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery (arthroplasty). The overall score for the OKS is acquired by simply summing the scores received for individual questions. This results in a continuous score ranging from 0 (most severe symptoms/problems) to 48 (least severe).

    1 year

  • To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones

    Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint. The FJS responses "never," "almost never," "seldom," "sometimes," and "mostly" translate into a 5-point Likert-response format translated linearly into a summative range from 0 to 100 scale with high values translating to the patient successfully "forgetting" about their joint during activities of daily living

    1 year

  • To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones

    Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) s a knee-specific instrument, developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of knee injury. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopaedic scales and generic measures.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Evaluate the clinical and radiological performance

    1 year

  • Evaluate safety of the cones

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Evaluate survivorship of revisions using tibial and femoral cones

    1 year

Interventions

* To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones * Evaluate the patient reported functionality of the operated knee * Evaluate the clinical and radiological performance * Evaluate safety of the cones * Evaluate survivorship of revisions using tibial and femoral cones

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The total expected number of subjects to be included in this study is a minimum number of 50. This number has been estimated according to the number of surgeries that have been performed and is considered in-line with observational studies published in literature.

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects underwent revision total knee replacement for any type of etiology (Osteoarthritis, Avascular necrosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Post-traumatic Arthritis, Polyarthritis, Primary implantation failure, Infection, Ligamentous Instability)
  • Subjects must have received a Medacta GMK Revision component using 3D metal tibial and femoral cones
  • Must be at minimum 1 year (12 months) post-treatment
  • No age limit criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device
  • Subjects that were incarcerated at the time of surgery.
  • History of alcoholism
  • On chemotherapy or radiation therapy during the time of interest
  • Habitual use of narcotic pain medications prior to surgery or after surgery for reasons other than knee pain
  • History of a metabolic disorder affecting the skeletal system other than osteoarthritis or osteoporosis
  • History of chronic pain issues for reasons other than knee pain
  • Progressive local or systemic infection during time of interest
  • Muscular loss, neuromuscular disease, or vascular deficiency of the affected limb
  • Obesity or excessive weight of subject

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwestern

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2024

First Posted

August 30, 2024

Study Start

February 13, 2024

Primary Completion

February 13, 2025

Study Completion

February 13, 2025

Last Updated

September 29, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations