Effect of a New HA Filler in Correcting Nasolabial Fold
New HA Filler Versus Juvederm for Nasolabial Fold Correction
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new HA filler for nasolabial fold correction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 8, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2024
CompletedAugust 28, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.6 years
August 22, 2024
August 27, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
WSRS
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale from 1 (no visible fold) to 5 (extremely deep and long folds)
at 24 weeks after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
GAIS
at 24 weeks after treatment
Adverse events related to the procedure
up to 24 weeks
Study Arms (2)
New HA filler (Curea)
EXPERIMENTALThe left/right assignment was sealed in a nontransparent envelop.
Juvederm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe left/right assignment was sealed in a nontransparent envelop.
Interventions
Hyaluronic acid filler injection were administered into the mid-dermis of the nasolabial fold.
Hyaluronic acid filler injection were administered into the mid-dermis of the nasolabial fold.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who had prominent NLFs with a WSRS score of 3 or 4 on both sides
You may not qualify if:
- patients with active facial skin diseases or history of severe allergies, autoimmune disorders, or hypersensitivity to HA or any of the excipients contained in the investigational filler
- participants who had used a local topical preparation (steroid and retinoid) within 2 weeks before the study
- participants who had undergone chemical peeling, laser procedures, or acne treatments within 4 months before the study
- participants who had been injected with other biomaterials, including HA within 6 months before the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, 13620, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Kim BR, Shin JW, Kim DW, Choung JJ, Jang Y, Lee SH, Seo BS, Huh CH. Efficacy and Safety of New Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Fold Correction: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2026 Feb 1;157(2):249-256. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012320. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
PMID: 40707029DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bo Ri Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2024
First Posted
August 28, 2024
Study Start
October 16, 2021
Primary Completion
May 8, 2023
Study Completion
May 8, 2023
Last Updated
August 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share