NCT06573463

Brief Summary

To assess the longevity of prefabricated versus conventional band and loop space maintainers in children with prematurely lost first primary molars. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 16, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 28, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Gingival Health

    By using gingival index of Loe and Silness ,scores gingival inflammation from 0-3 0 = normal gingiva 1. = mild inflammation: slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing 2. = moderate inflammation: redness, edema, glazing, or bleeding on probing 3. = severe inflammation: marked redness and edema, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding

    3 month and 9 month

  • Cement integrity

    Visual inspection of cement solution by using blunt periodontal explorer and mirror, Binary (Yes, No)

    3 month and 9 month

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Space loss between the abutment teeth.

    0 month and 9 month

  • Change in arch dimension:

    0 month and 9 month

Study Arms (2)

Conventional band and loop

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional band and loop is the most widely used space maintainer, and the most effective. It shows high success rate and good patient compliance, but it needs more than one visit to be applied.

Device: Conventional Band and loop

Prefabricated band and loop

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Prefabricated space maintainer requires only one visit as it fits into the patient's mouth at the clinic without needing the dental lab. It comes in a kit with different band sizes.

Device: Prefabricated band and loop

Interventions

Prefabricated space maintainer requires only one visit as it fits into the patient's mouth at the clinic without needing the dental lab. It comes in a kit with different band sizes.

Also known as: Ready-made band and loop, Chairside band and loop
Prefabricated band and loop

Conventional band and loop is the most widely used space maintainer, It shows high success rate and good patient compliance, but needs more than one visit due to the laboratory work.

Conventional band and loop

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 6 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients having mandibular first deciduous molar indicated for extraction due to extensive coronal caries beyond possible repair, root caries and/or failed pulp therapy.
  • Caries free, or restored mandibular second primary molars and deciduous canines on the side of the extraction maintained throughout the entire follow-up period.
  • Children are classified as cooperative or potentially cooperative according to Wright's classification of child behavior.
  • According to space analysis, available space is less than or equal to the needed space
  • /3 to less than 2/3 of the root of the permanent successor is formed to the prematurely lost primary molars
  • Children are mentally capable of communication.
  • Children aged 4-6 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with any parafunctional habits.
  • Children with previous allergies to stainless steel.
  • Permanent successors with 2/3 of its roots formed and space analysis does not indicate the fabrication of space maintainer.
  • Parental refusal of participation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cairo university

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Kamki H, Kalaskar R, Balasubramanian S, Badhe H, Kalaskar A. Clinical Effectiveness of Fiber-reinforced Composite Space Maintainer and Band and Loop Space Maintainer in a Pediatric Patient: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S82-S93. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2044.

    PMID: 35082473BACKGROUND
  • Tahririan D, Safaripour M, Eshghi A, Bonyadian AH. Comparison of the longevity of prefabricated and conventional band and loops in children's primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Nov 12;16(6):428-434. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.

    PMID: 31803390BACKGROUND
  • Padma Kumari B, Retnakumari N. Loss of space and changes in the dental arch after premature loss of the lower primary molar: a longitudinal study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Jun;24(2):90-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.26023.

    PMID: 16823234BACKGROUND
  • Thakur B, Bhardwaj A, Luke AM, Wahjuningrum DA. Effectiveness of traditional band and loop space maintainer vs 3D-printed space maintainer following the loss of primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 18;14(1):14081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61743-7.

    PMID: 38890410BACKGROUND
  • Zhao J, Jin H, Li X, Qin X. Dental arch spatial changes after premature loss of first primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of split-mouth studies. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03111-x.

    PMID: 37380944BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Dina Y El Kharadly, Lecturer

    October 6 University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blinding will not be feasible neither for the operator nor the patient. As there are some differences in the clinical steps, the form of the appliances and number of needed visits. Outcome assessor and Statistician will be blinded from the intervention and control not knowing which group represents which procedure.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A randomized controlled clinical trial, parallel group, allocation ratio 1:1 Framework superiority
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2024

First Posted

August 27, 2024

Study Start

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion

September 1, 2025

Study Completion

October 1, 2025

Last Updated

August 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Locations