NCT06568770

Brief Summary

To compare the immediate and postoperative analgesic efficacy of S-FICB and PENG block will be the objective. The use of ultrasonography in anesthesia has helped the anesthetist to see the nerve, needle and the distribution of the drug, thereby enhancing the chances of a favorable outcome of the nerve block. Grade A recommendation for an ultrasound guided approach to the peripheral nerve blocks is supported by level Ib evidence for a shortened time for the onset of sensory block, decreased performance time and lower drug doses10. Although individually both the blocks have been studied, there are only a handful of studies comparing both techniques under ultrasound guidance for making patient positioning for spinal anesthesia easy. And no local data is available comparing these blocks. So, we want to compare the analgesic efficacy of USG PENG block with USG S-FICB block in patients with fracture femur in reducing pain associated with positioning (sitting) for subarachnoid block, duration of analgesia, opioid sparing effect and complications. So that procedure with better analgesic efficacy and less complications will be included in our local guidelines as a part of multimodal analgesia.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 10, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 13, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 23, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 10, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 10, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

August 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

PENG,S-FICB,ASA,EOSP

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Ease Of Spinal Positioning

    The ease of spinal positioning (EOSP) will be assessed on the scale of 0-3 0 = unable to position 1. = patient had abnormal posturing due to pain and required support for positioning 2. = mild discomfort but does not require support for positioning 3. = optimal condition where the patient was able to position himself without pain

    20 minutes till Performance of spinal anaesthesia

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Post op Analgesia

    from performance of block to first rescue analgesia(in hours)

  • opioid sparing effect

    24 hrs

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Post op Nausea Vomiting

    24 hrs

Study Arms (2)

GROUP S-FICB

OTHER

Suprainguinal Facia iliaca Block

Drug: USG GUIDED SUPRA-INGUINAL FASCIA ILIACA BLOCK

GROUP-PENG

OTHER

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block

Drug: PERICAPSULAR NERVE BLOCK

Interventions

With the patient in the proper position, the skin will be disinfected and the transducer positioned to identify the femoral artery and the iliopsoas muscle and fascia iliaca. The transducer will be moved laterally until the sartorius muscle is identified. As the needle will eventually pierce the fascia, maybe a "pop" will be felt. After negative aspiration, 1-2 mL of local anesthetic will be injected to confirm the proper injection plane between the fascia and the ilio-psoas muscle. A proper injection will result in the separation of the fascia iliaca by the local anesthetic in the medial-lateral direction from the point of injection as described. After the spread of the drug will be seen, the rest of the drug volume will be injected

Also known as: S-FICB
GROUP S-FICB

an ultrasound probe will be placed over the line joining anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and pubic tubercle (PT) keeping lateral margin at ASIS and adjusted the probe to get a sonoanatomic view for PENG block. The needle entry point will be selected on the skin in such a manner that perpendicular needle entry will guide needle near target point iliopectineal eminence (IPE). The needle entry point will be anaesthetized with 2 ml 1% lidocaine and 22G 80mm stimuplex needle will be inserted "out-of- plane" to reach the bony rim near IPE avoiding injury to femoral nerve (visible just lateral to femoral artery). On bony contact, 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected slowly with repeated aspiration to avoid intravascular injection. The correct needle position will be confirmed by drug spread under ilio-psoas muscle and then the rest of the drug volume will be injected.

Also known as: PENG
GROUP-PENG

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Both Genders (Male /Female). 2. Age between 20 years to 70 years. 3. Radiologically confirmed femur fracture. 4. ASA Class I, II, III.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal
  • Other distracting painful pathology
  • Any contraindication to Spinal Anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks
  • Coagulopathic disorders
  • H/O ischemic heart disease
  • Patients on opioids for chronic pain
  • Patients with significant cognitive impairment
  • Patients with no pain while sitting by themselves without any support.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sahiwal Medical College

Sahiwal, Punjab Province, 57000, Pakistan

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeBradycardiaHypotensionFemoral Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesLeg Injuries

Study Officials

  • Adeel Riaz, MD

    Sahiwal medical college sahiwal

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Dr Shajeea Asghar, MBBS

CONTACT

Dr Muhammad Shahid, FCPS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Group 1 will receive S-FICB and Group 2 will receive PENG
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident Anaesthetist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2024

First Posted

August 23, 2024

Study Start

July 10, 2024

Primary Completion

November 10, 2025

Study Completion

January 10, 2026

Last Updated

October 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data will be available on request after completion of study i.e. March 2025.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
March 2025
Access Criteria
On Demand

Locations