Neurocognitive Exercises for Ankle Instability
Is a Neurocognitively Enriched Exercise Effective in Reducing Re-Injury Risk and Improving Balance and Proprioception in Individuals With Lateral Ankle Instability?
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the general population, 19.0-26.6 per 1000 cases of ankle instability have been reported, while in the athletic population, the rate is 11.3 per 1000. Ankle instability also predisposes individuals to recurrent instability, leading to persistent symptoms. After ankle injuries, temporary increases in afferent activity, along with long-term deficits in somatosensory information from ligaments, may cause central neuroplasticity that affects sensorimotor function. This central neuroplasticity can lead to permanent dysfunctions in the affected limb, thereby increasing the likelihood of developing and maintaining chronic ankle instability (CAI). In addition to the association between impaired balance and reduced proprioception with CAI, it has been reported that the central nervous system may fail to manage joint stress due to its inability to discern load on the ligaments. Impaired neurocognition has been linked to decreased performance and higher rates of re-injury. Deficiencies in neuromuscular control, motor learning, or other neurocognitive components related to an individual's performance and safety may affect the ability to respond appropriately in a dynamic environment. Any deficiencies in these neurocognitive processes can hinder the successful completion of tasks. The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the effects of neurocognitively enriched rehabilitation versus traditional rehabilitation on re-injury risk, balance, and proprioception in individuals with a history of ankle instability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2028
August 11, 2025
August 1, 2025
2 years
August 20, 2024
August 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
It is a 30-point, 9-item scale measuring the severity of functional ankle instability. Lower scores indicate functional ankle instability. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for this valid and reliable scale is 3 points.
change from baseline at 6 months
Surface Electromyography-maximum voluntary isometric contraction
Electrode placements will be performed in accordance with the European Recommendations from Surface EMG for Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM).
change from baseline at 6 months
Surface Electromyography-muscles' normal functional activities
Electrode placements will be performed in accordance with the European Recommendations from Surface EMG for Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM).
change from baseline at 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Ultrasonography
3 times for 24 weeks
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
3 times for 24 weeks
Joint Range of Motion Evaluation
3 times for 24 weeks
Tampa Kinesiophoby Scoring
3 times for 24 weeks
Star Excursion Test
3 times for 24 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Neurocognitive Enriched Exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals with a diagnosis of lateral ankle instability who underwent supervised neurocognitive enriched exercise under the guidance of a physiotherapist for 8 weeks, 2 days a week.
Multimodal Exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals with a diagnosis of lateral ankle instability who underwent supervised routine exercise under the guidance of a physiotherapist for 8 weeks, 2 days a week.
Interventions
An intervention planned, progressed, and conducted under the supervision of a physiotherapist, which enriches strengthening, balance, range of motion, stretching, and mobilization exercises with neurocognitive elements.
Supervised and progressively advanced interventions that include strengthening, balance, range of motion, stretching, and mobilization exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The documented unilateral ankle instability confirmed through clinical examinations (drawer test, talar tilt test) and MRI in cases requiring differential diagnosis.
- A history of an initial ankle sprain occurring at least 6 months ago.
- The presence of a recurrent sense of giving way that started at least 6 months ago and has been intermittently persistent.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of a history of previous surgery in the lower extremity.
- Identification of organic and non-organic lesions such as cartilage injuries, periarticular tendon tears, and impingement syndromes.
- The existence of a fracture accompanying instability in the foot-ankle.
- Presence of congenital deformities in the foot-ankle.
- Diagnosis of talus osteochondral lesion.
- Diagnosis of ankle arthritis.
- Presence of medial ligament lesion.
- Existence of peripheral neuropathy.
- Presence of additional rheumatological diseases.
- Regular moderate-level exercise for at least 3 days a week in the last 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasalead
- Bezmialem Vakif Universitycollaborator
- Acıbadem Atunizade Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University
Istanbul, 34752, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
Gribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, Docherty CL, Fourchet F, Fong DT, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, Verhagen EA, Vicenzino BT, Wikstrom EA, Delahunt E. Evidence review for the 2016 International Ankle Consortium consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;50(24):1496-1505. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096189. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
PMID: 27259753BACKGROUNDOwoeye OBA, Palacios-Derflingher LM, Emery CA. Prevention of Ankle Sprain Injuries in Youth Soccer and Basketball: Effectiveness of a Neuromuscular Training Program and Examining Risk Factors. Clin J Sport Med. 2018 Jul;28(4):325-331. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000462.
PMID: 29864071BACKGROUNDvan Dijk CN, Vuurberg G. There is no such thing as a simple ankle sprain: clinical commentary on the 2016 International Ankle Consortium position statement. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;51(6):485-486. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096733. Epub 2016 Oct 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 27797735BACKGROUNDXue X, Ma T, Li Q, Song Y, Hua Y. Chronic ankle instability is associated with proprioception deficits: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Mar;10(2):182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
PMID: 33017672BACKGROUNDSuttmiller AMB, McCann RS. Neural excitability of lower extremity musculature in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020 Aug;53:102436. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102436. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
PMID: 32505988BACKGROUNDNeedle AR, Lepley AS, Grooms DR. Central Nervous System Adaptation After Ligamentous Injury: a Summary of Theories, Evidence, and Clinical Interpretation. Sports Med. 2017 Jul;47(7):1271-1288. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0666-y.
PMID: 28005191BACKGROUNDWilke J, Groneberg DA. Neurocognitive function and musculoskeletal injury risk in sports:A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2022 Jan;25(1):41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
PMID: 34303619BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayşenur Erekdağ, MSc
Bezmialem Vakif University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The assessor will not know which participant received which intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2024
First Posted
August 23, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Last Updated
August 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08