The Study Aims to Improve the Accuracy of Detecting Spina Bifida During Early Ultrasound Scans. to Achieve This, an AI Model Has Been Developed to Provide Feedback About the Presence of Spina Bifida. a RCT Has Been Designed to Compare the Effectiveness of AI Feedback with No AI Feedback.
Evaluation of XAI-assisted Spina Bifida Diagnosis
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to improve the accuracy of detecting spina bifida during early ultrasound scans. To achieve this, an AI model has been developed to provide feedback about the presence of spina bifida. A RCT has been designed to compare the effectiveness of AI feedback with no AI feedback.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2024
CompletedDecember 4, 2024
December 1, 2024
4 months
May 22, 2024
December 2, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of XAI-assisted spina bifida diagnosis
The study aims to evaluate whether AI feedback improve the accuracy of diagnosing spina bifida by comparing the number of correct and incorrect responses in a task involving 20 images.
One month after the survey is distributed.
Study Arms (2)
AI feedback
EXPERIMENTALThe participant will receive AI feedback upon completing the task of analyzing 20 images. The AI feedback will include a prediction (Normal/Spina Bifida) along with a confidence score ranging from 0.0 to 1.0, where 0.0 indicates the lowest confidence and 1.0 indicates the highest confidence.
No AI feedback
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe participants will complete the task of analyzing 20 images without any AI feedback.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Obstetricians
You may not qualify if:
- Fetal medicine specialists
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2024
First Posted
August 22, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 30, 2024
Study Completion
October 30, 2024
Last Updated
December 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12