NCT06565910

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to study the analgesic effect of liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine for Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block in postoperative pain management following hip replacement surgery. It will also assess the safety of liposomal bupivacaine for this purpose. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.Is liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine superior to ropivacaine in terms of analgesic efficacy, duration of pain relief, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction?
  2. 2.What medical problems do participants encounter when using liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine for PENG block in postoperative pain management following hip replacement surgery?
  3. 3.Receive liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine or ropivacaine as a regional anesthetic for PENG block under ultrasound guidance.
  4. 4.Undergo hip replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia.
  5. 5.Have pain relief, opioid analgesic consumption, and incidence of complications assessed at multiple time points within 72 hours after surgery.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
2mo left

Started Dec 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress91%
Dec 2024Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 9, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 4, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 13, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

August 9, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 11, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Bupivacaine LiposomePENG blockHip ArthroplastyRandomized Controlled Trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Overall Opioid Consumption

    This primary outcome entails tracking and assessing the total opioid consumption by participants following hip replacement surgery. The evaluation includes quantifying the amount of opioids prescribed and consumed by participants for pain management post-surgery. Opioid medications administered will be converted to morphine equivalents based on established conversion ratios. By analyzing overall opioid consumption, the study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the interventions in managing postoperative pain.

    this outcome will be monitored and recorded within 72 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain intensity

    at multiple time points within 72 hours post-surgery.

  • Time to First Rescue Analgesic

    72 hours after surgery.

  • Incidence of Complications or Adverse Events

    90 days after the surgical procedure

  • Duration of Hospital Stay

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Liposomal Bupivacaine plus Bupivacaine Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will receive liposomal bupivacaine(LB) plus bupivacaine(B) as a local anesthetic for PENG block under ultrasound guidance. Liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine is being investigated for its analgesic effect in postoperative pain management following hip replacement surgery. This arm aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, duration of pain relief, and safety profile of liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine compared to the standard local anesthetic, ropivacaine. Participants in this arm will undergo hip replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia and will be assessed for pain relief, opioid analgesic consumption, and any associated complications at multiple time points within 72 hours after surgery.

Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine

Ropivacaine Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this arm will receive ropivacaine (R) as a local anesthetic for the PENG block under ultrasound guidance. Ropivacaine, a routinely used local anesthetic in clinical practice, is being compared to liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine to assess its analgesic effect in postoperative pain management following hip replacement surgery. This arm aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, duration of pain relief, and safety profile of ropivacaine in comparison to the investigational intervention, liposomal bupivacaine. Participants in this arm will undergo hip replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia and will be assessed for pain relief, opioid analgesic consumption, and any associated complications at multiple time points within 72 hours after surgery.

Drug: Ropivacaine

Interventions

Liposomal bupivacaine is a prolonged-release formulation of the local anesthetic bupivacaine. This intervention involves the administration of liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine as a local anesthetic for the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block under ultrasound guidance. Liposomal bupivacaine is being investigated for its analgesic effect in postoperative pain management following hip replacement surgery. This formulation is designed to provide extended pain relief as compared to conventional bupivacaine formulations.

Also known as: LB+B
Liposomal Bupivacaine plus Bupivacaine Intervention

Ropivacaine is a commonly used local anesthetic in clinical practice, and it serves as the active comparator intervention in this study. Participants in the comparator arm will receive ropivacaine as a local anesthetic for the PENG block under ultrasound guidance.

Also known as: R
Ropivacaine Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) I\~II
  • Normal coagulation
  • Clinical diagnosis of hip fracture

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of severe systemic diseases or ASA grade III or higher
  • Allergy to amide local anesthetics

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, HUST

Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, Bordeianou L, Weiss E, Lee L, Boutros M, McClane J, Feldman LS, Steele SR. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Aug;60(8):761-784. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000883. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28682962BACKGROUND
  • Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M, Semple JL, Schrag C, Barreto M, Blondeel P, Hamming J, Dayan J, Ljungqvist O; ERAS Society. Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1056e-1071e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003242.

    PMID: 28445352BACKGROUND
  • Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, Glaser G, Altman A, Meyer LA, Taylor JS, Iniesta M, Lasala J, Mena G, Scott M, Gillis C, Elias K, Wijk L, Huang J, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May;29(4):651-668. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

    PMID: 30877144BACKGROUND
  • Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Brunelli A, Cerfolio RJ, Gonzalez M, Ljungqvist O, Petersen RH, Popescu WM, Slinger PD, Naidu B. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;55(1):91-115. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301.

    PMID: 30304509BACKGROUND
  • Giron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.

    PMID: 30063657BACKGROUND
  • McCann ME. Liposomal Bupivacaine. Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):139-142. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003658. No abstract available.

    PMID: 33433621BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck FracturesFemur Head NecrosisHip Fractures

Interventions

BupivacaineRopivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesHip InjuriesLeg InjuriesOsteonecrosisBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesNecrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Officials

  • Wei Mei, MD

    Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, HUST

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Given the distinct visual appearance of the liposomal bupivacaine (milky white) and ropivacaine (transparent), a double-blind study design is not feasible. Consequently, this study employs a single-blind approach where neither participants nor outcome assessors will be aware of treatment allocation. Healthcare providers administering the study drug will be aware of the treatment group assignment. Rigorous procedures will be implemented to minimize potential bias, including standardized outcome assessment tools, blinded data entry, and independent data analysis.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study utilizes a parallel interventional design, where participants undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery will be allocated into two separate groups. One group will receive liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine as a regional anesthetic for Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block, while the other group will receive ropivacaine for the same purpose. Both interventions will be administered under ultrasound guidance. The study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy, duration of pain relief, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction between the two groups, with assessments conducted at multiple time points within 72 hours post-surgery. The parallel design allows for the direct comparison of the two interventions and their respective outcomes in managing postoperative pain following hip arthroplasty.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2024

First Posted

August 22, 2024

Study Start

December 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

individual participant data sets to be shared will include all collected individual participant data that underlie the results reported in any publications resulting from the trial. This would typically include data related to pain relief, opioid analgesic consumption, incidence of complications, and any other relevant outcomes assessed at multiple time points within 72 hours after surgery.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
starting 6 months after publication.
Access Criteria
The IPD and any additional supporting information will be shared with qualified researchers upon request. Access will be granted for the purpose of conducting further analyses related to the outcomes of the clinical trial, such as but not limited to, pain relief, opioid analgesic consumption, and complications. Requests for access will be reviewed by the principal investigators and designated research personnel to ensure that the proposed analyses align with the objectives of the study and maintain participant confidentiality. Access to the data will be provided through a secure mechanism that safeguards the privacy and integrity of the individual participant data.

Locations