Conventional CPAP Airsense 10 VS Portable Air-Mini CPAP For Obstructive Sleep Apnea (CASPAM)
CASPAM
Comparing A Conventional CPAP Airsense 10 VS Portable Air-Mini CPAP For Obstructive Sleep Apnea From Users' Perspective; A Cross - Over Study
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been one of the topmost global health problems. It is an underdiagnosed disease which have a huge burden on healthcare if left untreated. Almost 80-90% of adults are underdiagnosed of OSA Obesity primarily is one of the supreme risk factors for developing OSA. Globally, obesity cases have risen affecting almost two billion people. According to National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2019, 1 in 2 adults in Malaysia were overweight or obese. Report from World Obesity Atlas 2023 predicts that adult obesity will rise 4.7% annually from 2020 - 2035, while child obesity will increase by 5.3% per year over similar timeline. Overweight individuals will have a significant economic impact on Malaysia's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2035 by 2.8% which is estimated to be about RM 3.2 trillion. Sequalae of OSA is divided into two (cardiovascular-metabolic effect and neurocognitive effect). This group of patients are at high risk of developing hypertension, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia which then leads to pulmonary hypertension and heart failure. More importantly, from the neurocognitive point of view, persistent sleep deprivation will lead to poor concentration, impaired memory, personality changes affecting overall self-performance which can lead to depression and compromising safety as they have higher risk of work-related accidents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
October 8, 2025
October 1, 2025
2.2 years
August 19, 2024
October 5, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To compare the overall satisfaction using Visual Analogue Score 100mm among moderate to severe OSA participants receiving conventional CPAP Airsense 10 (0 mm - Not Satisfied at all, 100mm - Very Satisfied)
Participants with moderate to severe OSA who underwent CPAP trial using CPAP Airsence 10
7 days after first usage of CPAP Airsense 10
To compare the overall satisfaction using Visual Analogue Score 100mm among moderate to severe OSA participants receiving CPAP Air-Mini. (0 mm - Not Satisfied at all, 100mm - Very Satisfied)
Participants with moderate to severe OSA who underwent CPAP trial using CPAP Air Mini
7 days after first usage of CPAP Air-Mini
Secondary Outcomes (12)
To evaluate the efficacy of CPAP machine Airsense 10 in terms of percentage AHI reduction (Optimal titration=AHI <5, Good titration=AHI ≤10 or by 50%, Adequate titration= AHI reduction by 75% from baseline)
7 days after first usage of CPAP Airsense 10
To evaluate the efficacy of CPAP machine Air-Mini 10 in terms of percentage AHI reduction (Optimal titration=AHI <5, Good titration=AHI ≤10 or by 50%, Adequate titration= AHI reduction by 75% from baseline)
7 days after first usage of CPAP Air-Mini
To determine the average 95th centile pressure required using conventional CPAP Airsense 10
7 days after first usage of CPAP Airsence 10
To determine the average 95th centile pressure required using CPAP Air-Mini
7 days after first usage of CPAP Air-Mini
To compare the satisfaction using Visual Analogue Score 100mm among moderate to severe OSA participants receiving conventional CPAP Airsense 10 (0 mm - Not Satisfied at all, 100mm - Very Satisfied), in terms of air leak
7 days after first usage of CPAP Airsence 10
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CPAP Airsense 10
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in CPAP Airsense 10
CPAP AIr-Mini
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in CPAP AIr-Mini
Interventions
Patients' satisfaction and CPAP efficacy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged ≥ 18 years.
- Patients diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA (based on AHI classification from sleep study performed).
- Patients who are able to understand and answer the questionnaire given.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are unable to give consent to the study.
- Patients who have been diagnosed with OSA and already on CPAP machine.
- Patients who had underlying Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS).
- Patients who had underlying co-morbidities that worsen apnea symptoms, such as congestive cardiac failure, active malignancy, narcolepsy, active alcohol or drug abuse, treatment-refractory dementia, psychotic illness and active use of drugs that disturb the sleep architecture (i.e hypnotics or stimulants of central nervous system).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National University of Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
Related Publications (3)
Abbasi A, Gupta SS, Sabharwal N, Meghrajani V, Sharma S, Kamholz S, Kupfer Y. A comprehensive review of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Sci. 2021 Apr-Jun;14(2):142-154. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20200056.
PMID: 34381578RESULTRyan S, Taylor CT, McNicholas WT. Systemic inflammation: a key factor in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular complications in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome? Thorax. 2009 Jul;64(7):631-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.105577.
PMID: 19561283RESULTRotenberg BW, Vicini C, Pang EB, Pang KP. Reconsidering first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review of the literature. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Apr 6;45:23. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0136-4.
PMID: 27048606RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Faisal Abdul Hamid, MBBS(IIUM)
National University of Malaysia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2024
First Posted
August 21, 2024
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
October 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share