Low Flow Anesthesia in Children Undergoing Strabismus Surgery
LFA in child
Effects of Different Fresh Gas Flows on Emergence Agitation and Anesthetic Agent Consumption in Children Undergoing Strabismus Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
150
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Emergence agitation (EA) involves restlessness, disorientation, excitation, non-purposeful movement, inconsolability, thrashing, and incoherence during early recovery from general anesthesia. Sevoflurane and desflurane have increased the incidence of EA in children. A proposed explanation for this is that sevoflurane and desflurane cause differential recovery rates in brain function, due to differences in clearance of inhalational anesthetics from the central nervous system; whereas audition and locomotion recover first, cognitive function recovers later, resulting in EA. Low-flow anaesthesia (LFA) occurs when the fresh gas flow (FGF) is significantly lower than the patient's minute volume. In a low-flow system, the recirculated fraction should amount to at least 50% after carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption.In LFA using minimal FGF (250-500 mL/min), if the vaporizer is turned off 10-15 minutes before the end of the operation and the FGF is not changed, the inhaled anesthetic agent concentration gradually and slowly decreases to zero and the inhaled agent consumption decreases even more. In a study conducted on infants undergoing cleft lip-palate surgery, it was shown that the incidence of postoperative agitation were statistically lower in infants who administered 0.5 L/min FGF. Strabismus surgery is one of the most frequently performed ophthalmologic operations in children and is associated with moderate postoperative pain and a high incidence of EA (40-86%). The incidence of EA after strabismus surgery is high, especially due to visual disturbances; however, the pathogenesis of this condition remains unclear. In our study, the effects of different FGFs administered in children undergoing strabismus surgery on EA and anesthetic agent consumption will be investigated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 4, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 4, 2025
CompletedAugust 26, 2024
August 1, 2024
7 months
August 15, 2024
August 23, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Emergence agitation
Comparison of emergence agitation rates between groups.
At postoperative 5th, 10th, 15th, 30th, 45th min and 2 hour
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Sevoflurane consumption
İntraoperative period
Study Arms (3)
High flow anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALGroup I; After the laryngeal mask is placed, ventilation will be performed with FGF= 4 l/min, Sevoflurane vaporizer setting will be 2.5-3%. When the patients reach 1 MAC Sevoflurane, FGF will be reduced to 2 l/min. In Group I, the Sevoflurane vaporizer will be turned off at the end of the operation and FGF will be increased to 10 l/min.
Low flow anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALGroup II; After the laryngeal mask is placed, ventilation will be performed with FGF= 4 l/min, Sevoflurane vaporizer setting will be 2.5-3% and when the patients reach 1 MAC, FGF= 0.5 l/min will be reduced. In Group II, the Sevoflurane vaporizer will be turned off 10 minutes before the end of the operation and FGF will continue as 0.5 l/min until the end of the operation.
Low flow wash-in period
EXPERIMENTALGroup III; After the laryngeal mask is placed, ventilation will be performed with FGF= 1 l/min, Sevoflurane vaporizer setting will be 8%, inhaled sevoflurane concentration (Fisevo) will be gradually reduced to \< 4%. When the children reach 1 MAC sevoflurane, TGA= 0.5 l/min will be reduced. In Group III, the sevoflurane vaporizer will be turned off 10 minutes before the end of the operation and FGF will continue as 0.5 l/min until the end of the operation.
Interventions
Low-flow anaesthesia is generally adminstered as nitrogen wash-out, a period of higher flow rate in combination with a high vaporizer setting for initial saturation, and subsequent reduction of fresh gas flow and adjustment of the vaporizer to maintain the desired end-tidal anesthetic agent concentration (Etaa).In the initial wash-in phase, the vaporizer setting is adjusted to 6% for desflurane and 2.5-3% for sevoflurane, with FGF=4 L/min, until the Etaa concentration is 1-1.3 MAC. In another method, the vaporizer setting is adjusted to 12-18% for desflurane and 6-8% for sevoflurane, with FGA=1 L/min. Reducing the FGF during the wash-in period prevents unnecessary depth of anesthesia and reduces the consumption of inhalational anesthetics. In LFA using minimal FGF (250-500 mL/min), if the vaporizer is turned off 10-15 min before the end of the operation and the FGF is not changed, the inhaled anesthetic agent concentration gradually and slowly decreases to zero.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old children with strabismus
You may not qualify if:
- Mental retardation
- Cardiovascular disease
- Serebrovasculay disease
- Renal disease
- Hepatic disease
- Pulmonary disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Sripriya R, Ravindran C, Murugesan R. Comparison of recovery characteristics with two different washout techniques of desflurane anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;64(9):756-761. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_623_20. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
PMID: 33162569BACKGROUNDBrattwall M, Warren-Stomberg M, Hesselvik F, Jakobsson J. Brief review: theory and practice of minimal fresh gas flow anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;59(8):785-97. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9736-2. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
PMID: 22653840BACKGROUNDRubsam ML, Kruse P, Dietzler Y, Kropf M, Bette B, Zarbock A, Kim SC, Honemann C. A call for immediate climate action in anesthesiology: routine use of minimal or metabolic fresh gas flow reduces our ecological footprint. Can J Anaesth. 2023 Mar;70(3):301-312. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02393-z. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
PMID: 36814057BACKGROUNDYang Y, Song T, Wang H, Gu K, Ma P, Ma X, Zhao J, Li Y, Zhao J, Yang G, Yan R. Comparison of two different sevoflurane expelling methods on emergence agitation in infants following sevoflurane anesthesia. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):6200-5. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26131225BACKGROUNDAouad MT, Nasr VG. Emergence agitation in children: an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Dec;18(6):614-9. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000188420.84763.35.
PMID: 16534301BACKGROUNDVoepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tait AR. A prospective cohort study of emergence agitation in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1625-1630. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000062522.21048.61.
PMID: 12760985RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Feride Karacaer, Assoc Prof
Cukurova University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2024
First Posted
August 19, 2024
Study Start
November 4, 2024
Primary Completion
June 4, 2025
Study Completion
July 4, 2025
Last Updated
August 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08