Restrictive Versus Liberal Thresholds for RBC Transfusion in ECMO
TREC
5 other identifiers
interventional
526
3 countries
12
Brief Summary
Rationale: In patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is very common. This is possibly due to the application of liberal thresholds and the lack of evidence-based guidelines. Although RBC transfusion can be lifesaving, it is also a risk-bearing intervention with substantial risk for morbidity and mortality in this critically ill population. Also, with increasing scarcity, RBC transfusions are becoming more expensive. Furthermore, in the past decades it has been shown in several critically ill patient populations - not on ECMO - that maintaining a restrictive hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for RBC transfusion is non-inferior, including in cardiothoracic surgery, acute myocardial infarction and septic shock. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a restrictive transfusion threshold for RBC is safe to apply in patients on ECMO in comparison with a liberal transfusion threshold. Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to study in a prospective randomized comparison whether a restrictive RBC transfusions strategy is non-inferior compared to a liberal strategy in patients on ECMO with respect to 90-day mortality. Study design: Prospective multi-center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Study population: Patients, 18 years or older, receiving ECMO. Intervention: Restrictive RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 7.0 g/dL (4.3 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. The aimed Hb target range of the restrictive/intervention group will be 7.1 - 9.0 g/dL (4.3 - 5.6 mmol/L). Liberal RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 9.0 g/dL (5.6 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. Target range of the liberal group is defined as Hb 9.1 - 11.0 g/dL Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome parameter is 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: 1) proportion of patients on ECMO exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion; 2) RBC volume infused per patient during ECMO; 3) reasons for RBC transfusion other than Hb triggers; 4) transfusion reactions; 5) time on ECMO; 6) length of hospital- and ICU-stay; 7) in-ICU morbidity; 8) quality of life (QoL), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; 9) costs related to a) transfusion, b) hospital admission and c) transfusion-related sequelae.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2029
April 8, 2025
April 1, 2025
3.8 years
August 13, 2024
April 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
90-day all-cause mortality
The primary outcome measure is all-cause mortality within 90 days, i.e. the proportion of patients who die from any cause during this 90-day period following ECMO support.
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
In-hospital mortality
30 days
Duration
30 days
Red blood cell transfusion exposure
30 days
Adherence
30 days
EQ-5D-5L
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
In-ICU morbidity
30 days
Transfusion reasons
30 days
Exposure to other transfusion products
30 days
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Restrictive strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe restrictive strategy will consist of a transfusion Hb threshold of 7.0 g/dL, with a target Hb range of 7.1 - 9.0 g/dL. These thresholds are based on previous non-inferior trials in the patient populations in which VV ECMO (comparable to sepsis) and VA ECMO (cardiac surgery, acute myocardial infarction) are often applied.
Liberal strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe liberal strategy will consist of a transfusion Hb threshold of 9.0 g/dL, with a target Hb range of 9.1 - 11.0 g/dL. These Hb thresholds are based on thresholds that are currently used in ECMO.
Interventions
When the appropriate Hb threshold is reached, patients in each group will have one unit of RBC administered at a time. Within 3 hours after the transfusion, a repeat Hb concentration will be measured. Each group will only be transfused when their Hb level falls below the transfusion threshold. In case of a outlier measurement, clinicians are advised to repeat the measurement. The RBC transfusion must take place within 4 hours when the Hb trigger was measured.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is aged 18 years or older;
- Is receiving ECMO;
- (Deferred) informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Not expected to survive for 24 hours when assessed;
- Inability to receive blood products;
- (Known) decline to blood transfusions (e.g., Jehovah's Witnesses);
- Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) using low blood flow devices or pumpless devices (i.e., MINILUNG ®, PrismaLung+);
- Received ECMO over 48h before screening for eligibility.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Hôpital Erasme Brussels
Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1070, Belgium
KU Leuven, medical IC
Leuven, Flemish Brabant, 3000, Belgium
KU Leuven, surgical IC
Leuven, Flemish Brabant, 3000, Belgium
CHU Charleroi
Charleroi, Hainaut, 6000, Belgium
Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST)
Enschede, Drenthe, 7512 KZ, Netherlands
Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+ (MUMC+)
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen (UMCG)
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 GD, Netherlands
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, 3435 CM, Netherlands
Karolinska Universtiy Hospital
Stockholm, Stockholm County, 171 76, Sweden
Related Publications (23)
Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Langer T. Clinical review: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):243. doi: 10.1186/cc10490. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
PMID: 22188792BACKGROUNDMakdisi G, Wang IW. Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) review of a lifesaving technology. J Thorac Dis. 2015 Jul;7(7):E166-76. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.07.17.
PMID: 26380745BACKGROUNDVlaar AP, Oczkowski S, de Bruin S, Wijnberge M, Antonelli M, Aubron C, Aries P, Duranteau J, Juffermans NP, Meier J, Murphy GJ, Abbasciano R, Muller M, Shah A, Perner A, Rygaard S, Walsh TS, Guyatt G, Dionne JC, Cecconi M. Transfusion strategies in non-bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):673-696. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05884-8. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
PMID: 31912207BACKGROUNDde Bruin S, Scheeren TWL, Bakker J, van Bruggen R, Vlaar APJ; Cardiovascular Dynamics Section and Transfusion Guideline Task Force of the ESICM. Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey-the TRACE survey. Crit Care. 2019 Sep 11;23(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2591-6.
PMID: 31511083BACKGROUNDMartucci G, Grasselli G, Tanaka K, Tuzzolino F, Panarello G, Schmidt M, Bellani G, Arcadipane A. Hemoglobin trigger and approach to red blood cell transfusions during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the international TRAIN-ECMO survey. Perfusion. 2019 Apr;34(1_suppl):39-48. doi: 10.1177/0267659119830526.
PMID: 30966906BACKGROUNDAubron C, DePuydt J, Belon F, Bailey M, Schmidt M, Sheldrake J, Murphy D, Scheinkestel C, Cooper DJ, Capellier G, Pellegrino V, Pilcher D, McQuilten Z. Predictive factors of bleeding events in adults undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0196-7. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
PMID: 27714705BACKGROUNDRaasveld SJ, Karami M, van den Bergh WM, Oude Lansink-Hartgring A, van der Velde F, Maas JJ, van de Berg P, de Haan M, Lorusso R, Delnoij TSR, Dos Reis Miranda D, Mandigers L, Scholten E, Overmars M, Silvio Taccone F, Brasseur A, Dauwe DF, De Troy E, Hermans G, Meersseman P, Pappalardo F, Fominskiy E, Ivancan V, Bojcic R, de Metz J, van den Bogaard B, Donker DW, Meuwese CL, de Bakker M, Reddi B, de Bruin S, Lagrand WK, Henriques JPS, Broman LM, Vlaar APJ. RBC Transfusion in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb 1;50(2):224-234. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005398.
PMID: 35100195BACKGROUNDVincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, Gattinoni L, Thijs L, Webb A, Meier-Hellmann A, Nollet G, Peres-Bota D; ABC (Anemia and Blood Transfusion in Critical Care) Investigators. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002 Sep 25;288(12):1499-507. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.12.1499.
PMID: 12243637BACKGROUNDBosboom JJ, Klanderman RB, Zijp M, Hollmann MW, Veelo DP, Binnekade JM, Geerts BF, Vlaar APJ. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of transfusion-associated circulatory overload in a mixed intensive care unit population: a nested case-control study. Transfusion. 2018 Feb;58(2):498-506. doi: 10.1111/trf.14432. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
PMID: 29238981BACKGROUNDHebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, Marshall J, Martin C, Pagliarello G, Tweeddale M, Schweitzer I, Yetisir E. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):409-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400601.
PMID: 9971864BACKGROUNDMazer CD, Whitlock RP, Fergusson DA, Hall J, Belley-Cote E, Connolly K, Khanykin B, Gregory AJ, de Medicis E, McGuinness S, Royse A, Carrier FM, Young PJ, Villar JC, Grocott HP, Seeberger MD, Fremes S, Lellouche F, Syed S, Byrne K, Bagshaw SM, Hwang NC, Mehta C, Painter TW, Royse C, Verma S, Hare GMT, Cohen A, Thorpe KE, Juni P, Shehata N; TRICS Investigators and Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group. Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 30;377(22):2133-2144. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711818. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
PMID: 29130845BACKGROUNDMurphy GJ, Pike K, Rogers CA, Wordsworth S, Stokes EA, Angelini GD, Reeves BC; TITRe2 Investigators. Liberal or restrictive transfusion after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):997-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403612.
PMID: 25760354BACKGROUNDDucrocq G, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Puymirat E, Lemesle G, Cachanado M, Durand-Zaleski I, Arnaiz JA, Martinez-Selles M, Silvain J, Ariza-Sole A, Ferrari E, Calvo G, Danchin N, Avendano-Sola C, Frenkiel J, Rousseau A, Vicaut E, Simon T, Steg PG; REALITY Investigators. Effect of a Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy on Major Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: The REALITY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):552-560. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0135.
PMID: 33560322BACKGROUNDKracalik I, Mowla S, Basavaraju SV, Sapiano MRP. Transfusion-related adverse reactions: Data from the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module - United States, 2013-2018. Transfusion. 2021 May;61(5):1424-1434. doi: 10.1111/trf.16362. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PMID: 33880771BACKGROUNDHolst LB, Haase N, Wetterslev J, Wernerman J, Aneman A, Guttormsen AB, Johansson PI, Karlsson S, Klemenzson G, Winding R, Nebrich L, Albeck C, Vang ML, Bulow HH, Elkjaer JM, Nielsen JS, Kirkegaard P, Nibro H, Lindhardt A, Strange D, Thormar K, Poulsen LM, Berezowicz P, Badstolokken PM, Strand K, Cronhjort M, Haunstrup E, Rian O, Oldner A, Bendtsen A, Iversen S, Langva JA, Johansen RB, Nielsen N, Pettila V, Reinikainen M, Keld D, Leivdal S, Breider JM, Tjader I, Reiter N, Gottrup U, White J, Wiis J, Andersen LH, Steensen M, Perner A. Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013 May 23;14:150. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-150.
PMID: 23702006BACKGROUNDHayden SJ, Albert TJ, Watkins TR, Swenson ER. Anemia in critical illness: insights into etiology, consequences, and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 May 15;185(10):1049-57. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201110-1915CI. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
PMID: 22281832BACKGROUNDCarson JL, Stanworth SJ, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 12;10(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub4.
PMID: 27731885BACKGROUNDDocherty AB, Turgeon AF, Walsh TS. Best practice in critical care: anaemia in acute and critical illness. Transfus Med. 2018 Apr;28(2):181-189. doi: 10.1111/tme.12505. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
PMID: 29369437BACKGROUNDSpinelli E, Bartlett RH. Anemia and Transfusion in Critical Care: Physiology and Management. J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;31(5):295-306. doi: 10.1177/0885066615571901. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
PMID: 25693602BACKGROUNDGong MN, Thompson BT, Williams P, Pothier L, Boyce PD, Christiani DC. Clinical predictors of and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome: potential role of red cell transfusion. Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun;33(6):1191-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000165566.82925.14.
PMID: 15942330BACKGROUNDCorwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, Fink MP, Levy MM, Abraham E, MacIntyre NR, Shabot MM, Duh MS, Shapiro MJ. The CRIT Study: Anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill--current clinical practice in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104112.34142.79.
PMID: 14707558BACKGROUNDVlaar APJ, Toy P, Fung M, Looney MR, Juffermans NP, Bux J, Bolton-Maggs P, Peters AL, Silliman CC, Kor DJ, Kleinman S. A consensus redefinition of transfusion-related acute lung injury. Transfusion. 2019 Jul;59(7):2465-2476. doi: 10.1111/trf.15311. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
PMID: 30993745BACKGROUNDWiersum-Osselton JC, Whitaker B, Grey S, Land K, Perez G, Rajbhandary S, Andrzejewski C Jr, Bolton-Maggs P, Lucero H, Renaudier P, Robillard P, Santos M, Schipperus M. Revised international surveillance case definition of transfusion-associated circulatory overload: a classification agreement validation study. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Jul;6(7):e350-e358. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30080-8. Epub 2019 May 9.
PMID: 31080132BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexander P.J. Vlaar, PhD
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2024
First Posted
August 19, 2024
Study Start
November 26, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2029
Last Updated
April 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- The protocol will be available after publication, expected within 1 year after the start of all participating centers.
- Access Criteria
- Open access.
The study protocol will be submitted for publication in a prominent journal.