NCT06559397

Brief Summary

Background: Cervical proprioception, referring to the awareness of the head's position in space, plays a crucial role in maintaining postural control and preventing musculoskeletal injuries. While previous research has established the importance of cervical proprioception in motor function, its specific impact on body awareness and pain-related aspects remains less explored, particularly in healthy young individuals. Aim: This prospective cross-sectional study aims to investigate the impact of cervical proprioceptive error on body awareness, pressure pain threshold, pressure pain tolerance, conditioned pain modulation, and temporal summation in healthy young individuals. Methods: In asymptomatic participants, cervical proprioception will be assessed using the 'head position error test' in both right and left rotation directions with the CROM device. Participants will be then divided into two groups based on the presence of proprioceptive deviation (\>5°). Body awareness will beassessed using the 'Body Awareness Questionnaire,' while pressure pain threshold, pain tolerance, and temporal summation will be measured bilaterally with an algometer device (2 cm lateral to the C2 and C7 spinal processes, midpoint of the upper part of the trapezius, and over the temporomandibular joint) in both groups. Subsequently, the two groups will be compared using independent samples t-tests.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 14, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 25, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 14, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Cervical proprioceptionJoint position sensePainTemporal summationMechanosensitivityConditioned pain modulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Quantitative sensory testing

    Quantitative sensory testing including pain threshold, tolerance, conditioned pain modulation, and temporal summation will be assessed by pressure algometer. The "pain threshold" is the point at which a person first feels pain, the "pain tolerance" is the last point that a person can tolerate, and the "temporal summation" is the first painful threshold evaluated after 10 repeats of the pain threshold. Conditioned pain modulation is the modulation of pain perception under varying conditions. In the current study, a cold stimulus will be used.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Assessment of body awareness

    Body awareness will be assessed through a questionnaire, consisting of 18 items, divided into 4 subgroups aimed at determining the sensitivity level of normal or abnormal body composition (1. Changes during the body process, 2. Sleep-wake cycle, 3. Estimation of disease onset, 4. Prediction of bodily reactions). Participants are asked to rate each item on a scale of 1 to 7. The overall score is calculated, and a higher score indicates better body awareness. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire are reported to be high.

    Immediately after the intervention

Study Arms (2)

Proprioceptive deficit positive group

This group consists of young participants who exhibit a proprioceptive error in their cervical proprioception test. Proprioceptive error refers to an inaccurate perception of the head's position in space. In this study, participants with a deviation greater than 5 degrees during the test will be classified into this group.

Other: Assessment of cervical proprioception

Proprioceptive deficit negative goup

This group includes young participants who do not show any proprioceptive error in the cervical proprioception test. These participants accurately perceive the position of their head and thus do not have a proprioceptive deficit (less than 5 degrees)

Other: Assessment of cervical proprioception

Interventions

Cervical proprioception will be assessed using the 'head position error test' in both right and left rotation directions with the CROM device. Participants will be then divided into two groups based on the presence of proprioceptive errors (\>5°).

Proprioceptive deficit negative goupProprioceptive deficit positive group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study involves healthy young participants aged between 18 and 25 years. The participants will be divided into two groups based on the presence of cervical proprioceptive deviation (greater than 5°) as measured by the 'head position error test' using a CROM device.

You may qualify if:

  • \* Being between 18-25 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • History of cervical spine injuries or disorders
  • Chronic pain conditions or diagnosed musculoskeletal disorders
  • Previous neck or spine surgeries
  • Neurological or psychiatric conditions affecting proprioception or pain perception
  • Use of medications influencing pain sensitivity or proprioception
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Atılım University

Ankara, Ankara, 06560, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Apr;72(5):288-91.

    PMID: 2009044BACKGROUND
  • Kulkarni V, Chandy MJ, Babu KS. Quantitative study of muscle spindles in suboccipital muscles of human foetuses. Neurol India. 2001 Dec;49(4):355-9.

    PMID: 11799407BACKGROUND
  • Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Liu T, Liu Y. Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain-Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):143-164. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00230-z. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

    PMID: 33464539BACKGROUND
  • Mehling WE, Gopisetty V, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Hecht FM, Stewart A. Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005614. Epub 2009 May 19.

    PMID: 19440300BACKGROUND
  • Yang J, Lee B, Kim C. Changes in proprioception and pain in patients with neck pain after upper thoracic manipulation. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):795-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.795. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

    PMID: 25931733BACKGROUND
  • Law EY, Chiu TT. Measurement of cervical range of motion (CROM) by electronic CROM goniometer: a test of reliability and validity. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):141-8. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00358.

    PMID: 23640315BACKGROUND
  • Walton DM, Macdermid JC, Nielson W, Teasell RW, Chiasson M, Brown L. Reliability, standard error, and minimum detectable change of clinical pressure pain threshold testing in people with and without acute neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;41(9):644-50. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3666. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

    PMID: 21885906BACKGROUND
  • Karaca, S. (2017). Vücut Farkındalığı Anketinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Muğla.

    BACKGROUND
  • Heisler AC, Song J, Dunlop DD, Wohlfahrt A, Bingham CO III, Bolster MB, Clauw DJ, Marder W, Phillips K, Neogi T, Lee YC. Association of Pain Centralization and Patient-Reported Pain in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Aug;72(8):1122-1129. doi: 10.1002/acr.23994. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

    PMID: 31162824BACKGROUND
  • Acet N, Begen S. The proprioceptive puzzle: An observational study investigating the effects of cervical proprioceptive errors on quantitative sensory testing and body awareness in young individuals. PLoS One. 2025 Apr 21;20(4):e0321645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321645. eCollection 2025.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Nagihan Acet

    Atılım University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst. Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2024

First Posted

August 19, 2024

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

January 1, 2025

Study Completion

February 1, 2025

Last Updated

November 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations