NCT06555185

Brief Summary

This study aims to determine if the performance of female football players is affected after exposure to a potentiation protocol. It is hypothesized that performance in the selected physical tests will improve significantly and meaningfully after performing the chosen potentiation protocol compared to the control group's warm-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
17

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 12, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 15, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

August 12, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

performance enhancementwarm-upsprintchange of directionwomen's football

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Agility T-test

    Used to determine speed with directional changes such as forward sprinting, left and right side shuffling.

    First moment: beginning of the first training session; Second moment: at the end of the third week, after the fourth protocol session had been completed.

  • 40-m sprint test

    After a 5 s countdown, the participants ran forward following the route marked by cones, one at 0m indicating the start place and the other at 40m indicating the finish place. Participants started the test from a standing start position with the front foot approximately 2 cm behind the first cone.

    First moment: beginning of the first training session; Second moment: at the end of the third week, after the fourth protocol session had been completed.

Study Arms (2)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

Potentiation warm-up protocol with jumps combined with sprints with change of direction.

Other: Potentiation warm-up protocol

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual warm-up exercises as previously used by the whole team.

Other: Usual warm-up protocol

Interventions

The intervention protocol consisted of i) 1st set - six hurdle jumps, with a distance of 70 cm between each, followed by a 15-m sprint with COD; (ii) 2nd set - six lateral hurdle jumps (three to the left and three to the right) followed by a 10-m sprint with COD; (iii) 3rd set - six bouncy strides, followed by a 15-m sprint with COD; (iv) 4th set - six broad jumps followed by a 10-m sprint with COD. All COD circuits had different configurations, changing the sprint distance and the angle of the COD curve. All repetitions and sets were separated by 90-second recovery intervals, and each set was performed three times.

Experimental group

The usual warm-up consisted of (i) The first phase included dynamic stretching and drills to increase body temperature. This phase lasted 5-min and included slow jogging, light skipping, and dynamic stretches for hip flexors, glutes, quads, hamstrings, abductors, gastrocnemius and lower limb joints. (ii) The second phase was composed of exercises that intended to mimic specific movements of the football match, both with and without ball possession. This phase lasted 15 minutes and included exercises with and without possession of the ball, such as acceleration, COD, jumping over hurdles, and playful games with ball possession. In this group, the players only rested in a slow jog when they moved from the first to the second phase.

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • players from any playing position (except goalkeepers) able to train without limitations.

You may not qualify if:

  • players with any existing medical conditions that could compromise participation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Futebol Clube de Famalicão

Famalicão, Portugal

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Zylberberg T, Martins R, Pettersen SA, Afonso J, Matias Vale Baptista IA. Acute responses to a potentiation warm-up protocol on sprint and change of direction in female football players: a randomized controlled study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov 12;16(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-01015-z.

Study Officials

  • Ivan Baptista, PhD

    Faculty of Science and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2024

First Posted

August 15, 2024

Study Start

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion

April 30, 2023

Study Completion

April 30, 2023

Last Updated

August 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Raw data used for the study will be available in a public repository.

Time Frame
Raw data is already uploaded into a public repository and is intended to stay available without a date limit.
Access Criteria
No access criteria will be established.
More information

Available IPD Datasets

Individual Participant Data Set (10.17632/2cwcz2vx4v.1)Access

Locations