NCT06549023

Brief Summary

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the leading cause for blindness in working-age adults. The current gold standard treatment for PDR is panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). In current clinical practice, both single-session and multiple-session PRP approaches are widely accepted and utilized. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of single-session and multiple-session PRP.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
57mo left

Started Jan 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress22%
Jan 2025Dec 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 12, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2028

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2030

Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

August 8, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP)Single-session PRPMultiple-session PRPNavigated laserNavilasCentral subfield retinal thickness (CRT)Macular volumeOptical coherence tomography (OCT)Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)Wide-field fundus imagingOCT-angiographyRetinal oximetryElectroretinogram (ERG)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Central subfield retinal thickness (CRT)

    Mean change from baseline in CRT

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Vessel Perfusion Density (VPD)

    Mean change from baseline in VPD

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Vessel Length Density (VLD)

    Mean change from baseline in VLD

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Foveal Avascular Zone (FAZ)

    Mean change from baseline in FAZ

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Lesion size

    Mean change from baseline in lesion size

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Macular volume

    Mean change from baseline in macular volume

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Venular saturation

    Mean change from baseline in venular saturation

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Arteriolar saturation

    Mean change from baseline in arteriolar saturation

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Retinal diameter

    Mean change from baseline in retinal diameter

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Venular diameter

    Mean change from baseline in venular diameter

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Retinal function

    Mean change from baseline in retinal function using full-field electroretinogram (ERG)

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Diabetic macular edema (DME)

    Incidence of diabetic macular edema (DME)

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Subjective experience of pain after treatment

    Study patients' subjective experience of pain after treatment using visual analog scale (VAS)

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Subjective overall experience of the treatment

    Study patients' subjective overall experience of the treatment using verbal scale (VS)

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  • Cost-effectiveness

    We intend to conduct a thorough cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the single-session approach with the traditional multiple-session treatments. This analysis will factor in direct medical costs, including the expenses related to the laser equipment, healthcare professionals' time, and the required clinical facilities. We will also consider indirect costs such as patient travel expenses and time taken off work.

    Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

Study Arms (2)

Single-session panretinal PRP (SS-PRP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Administration of all panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatment in one comprehensive session, typically delivered in a single clinical visit.

Procedure: Single-session panretinal PRP (SS-PRP)

Multiple-session panretinal PRP (MS-PRP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Administration of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatment over two separate visits with at least one week apart.

Procedure: Multiple-session panretinal PRP (MS-PRP)

Interventions

Administration of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatment with navigated laser using Navilas in one comprehensive session, typically delivered in a single clinical visit.

Single-session panretinal PRP (SS-PRP)

Administration of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatment with navigated laser using Navilas over two separate visits with at least one week apart.

Multiple-session panretinal PRP (MS-PRP)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 years.
  • Patients with type 1 or type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with newly diagnosed Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, PDR.
  • Visual acuity ≥ 0.1 Snellen.
  • CRT of less than 300 micrometer measured by OCT without cysts in the neuroretina.
  • Clear media and adequately dilated pupil for PRP.

You may not qualify if:

  • Intraocular surgery within the last 4 months or planned within the next 3 months.
  • Previous or current center-involved diabetic macular edema (Ci-DME).
  • Previous PRP, intravitreal treatment (IVT), or macular laser treatment in study eye.
  • Treatment with medications known to risk macular edema.
  • Media opacity preventing adequate PRP.
  • General medical condition making office laser treatment very difficult or impossible.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ögonmottagning Mölndal/SU

Mölndal, 43130, Sweden

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic RetinopathyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DiseasesEye DiseasesDiabetic AngiopathiesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System DiseasesGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Marita Andersson Grönlund, M.D. Prof

    Göteborg University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Imadeddin Abu Ishkheidem, M.D.

CONTACT

Sofia Töyrä Silfverswärd, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly allocated to either the single-session (SS-PRP) or multiple-sessions (MS-PRP) panretinal photocoagulation groups using a computer-generated sequence. Block randomization will be utilized to ensure balanced group sizes and comparable participant characteristics.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2024

First Posted

August 12, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Locations