Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Breast Cancer Treatment
Pilot Testing of Metacognitive Strategy Training to Address Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this proposed project is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effect of metacognitive strategy training to improve activity performance, cognition, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). The other goal of this proposed project is to examine the effects of CO-OP on resting (rsFC)- and task-state functional connectivity as compared to an inactive control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 31, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
February 19, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.7 years
August 5, 2024
February 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Feasibility measures
Recruitment rate, retention rate
After study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Performance
Self-report measure of activity performance. Minimum = 1, Maximum = 10. Higher scores mean better performance.
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Satisfaction
Self-report measure of activity performance. Minimum = 1, Maximum = 10. Higher scores mean better performance.
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX)
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA)
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
The Activity Card Sort (ACS)
Pre-intervention (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Metacognitive strategy training (MCST)
EXPERIMENTALEach MCST session will be follow the procedures of Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) intervention. There will be 10, 45-minute, weekly sessions. All sessions will be delivered in-person with a trained occupational therapist.
Inactive Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive a weekly phone call from study staff to maintain contact and monitor changes in activity.
Interventions
The MCST group will follow procedures for the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance intervention. First, five functional, everyday life goals are identified collaboratively by the participant and interventionist. In the second meeting, the therapist introduces the approach to the subject and teach a global cognitive strategy (i.e., GOAL-PLAN-DO-CHECK). In all subsequent sessions, this strategy is used as the main problem-solving framework to facilitate skill acquisition. The subject identifies a GOAL, and then is guided by the therapist to discover a PLAN to potentially achieve the goal. The subject is then asked to DO the plan (if feasible during the therapy session otherwise asked to complete at home prior to the next treatment session), and subsequently to CHECK to see if the plan worked, i.e. the goal was achieved. This process is repeated until satisfactory performance is met for each established goal.
Weekly contact will be made via telephone call to (1) maintain study engagement, (2) introduce weekly social contact with researchers, mimicking some of the potential incidental effects of the experimental group, and (3) ascertain what, if any, additional steps participants have taken to reduce cognitive symptoms. The content of each of these meetings will be tracked in intervention notes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- self-reported CRCI (Global Rating of Cognition dysfunction as "Moderately" "Strongly "or "Extremely" AND a Cognitive Failures Questionnaire1 (CFQ) score \>30)
- completed treatment for active cancer diagnosis (invasive ductal or lobular BrCA Stages I, II, or III) at least 6 months but not greater than 3 years prior to participation
- able to read, write, and speak English fluently
- able to provide valid informed consent
- have a life expectancy of greater than 6 months at time of enrollment
- on stable doses (i.e., no changes in past 90 days) of medications that are known to impact cognitive function (i.e., anti-depressants)
You may not qualify if:
- prior cancer diagnoses of other sites with evidence of active disease within the past year
- active diagnoses of any acute or chronic brain-related neurological conditions that can alter normal brain anatomy or function (e.g., Parkinson's disease, dementia, cerebral infarcts) dementia symptoms as indicated by a score of \<23 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
- severe depressive symptoms (Personal Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥21)
- history of severe traumatic brain injury, prolonged loss of consciousness (e.g., coma)
- conditions contraindicated for MRI (e.g., electrical implants, pumps, claustrophobia)
- blue-yellow colorblindness
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Missouri-Columbialead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65211, United States
Related Publications (11)
Hutchinson AD, Hosking JR, Kichenadasse G, Mattiske JK, Wilson C. Objective and subjective cognitive impairment following chemotherapy for cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Nov;38(7):926-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
PMID: 22658913BACKGROUNDO'Farrell E, MacKenzie J, Collins B. Clearing the air: a review of our current understanding of "chemo fog". Curr Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;15(3):260-9. doi: 10.1007/s11912-013-0307-7.
PMID: 23483375BACKGROUNDSchagen SB, Wefel JS. Chemotherapy-related changes in cognitive functioning. EJC Suppl. 2013 Sep;11(2):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2013.07.007. No abstract available.
PMID: 26217131BACKGROUNDMyers JS. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Aug;13(4):413-21. doi: 10.1188/09.CJON.413-421.
PMID: 19648097BACKGROUNDJanelsins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG, Usuki K, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: current status. Semin Oncol. 2011 Jun;38(3):431-8. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.014.
PMID: 21600374BACKGROUNDWefel JS, Schagen SB. Chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012 Jun;12(3):267-75. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0264-9.
PMID: 22453825BACKGROUNDJanelsins MC, Kesler SR, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. Prevalence, mechanisms, and management of cancer-related cognitive impairment. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;26(1):102-13. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.864260.
PMID: 24716504BACKGROUNDCicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Felicetti T, Giacino JT, Harley JP, Harrington DE, Herzog J, Kneipp S, Laatsch L, Morse PA. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12):1596-615. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.19240.
PMID: 11128897BACKGROUNDCicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, Azulay J, Cantor J, Ashman T. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015.
PMID: 21440699BACKGROUNDHaskins E. Cognitive Rehabilitation Manual: Translating Evidence-Based Recommendations into Practice. vol 1. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2012.
BACKGROUNDWolf TJ, Doherty M, Kallogjeri D, Coalson RS, Nicklaus J, Ma CX, Schlaggar BL, Piccirillo J. The Feasibility of Using Metacognitive Strategy Training to Improve Cognitive Performance and Neural Connectivity in Women with Chemotherapy-Induced Cognitive Impairment. Oncology. 2016;91(3):143-52. doi: 10.1159/000447744. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
PMID: 27449501BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna E Boone, PhD, OTR/L
University of Missouri Occupational Therapy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All outcomes assessors will be blinded to participant study group assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2024
First Posted
August 9, 2024
Study Start
October 31, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
February 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02