Rapid Treatment of PTSD With Accelerated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
2 other identifiers
interventional
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will test the clinical efficacy of an accelerated TMS (accel-TMS) protocol that rapidly addresses PTSD symptoms with 1 week (25 sessions over 5 days) of condensed treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2028
May 20, 2026
May 1, 2026
3.6 years
August 6, 2024
May 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-V (CAPS-V) to determine left dl-PFC accel-TMS efficacy
CAPS-V is a 30-item clinical interview used to diagnose PTSD as well as monitor PTSD symptoms. Questions address the traumatic event(s), symptom duration, subjective distress, impact on functioning, dissociation, and symptom improvement since last evaluation. During the Acute Phase, CAPS-V will be used to determine the rapid efficacy of left dl-PFC accel-TMS compared to sham accel-TMS at approximately one-week post-treatment.
Assessment of symptoms during the preceding week.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-V (CAPS-V) to determine dm-PFC accel-TMS efficacy
A 30-item clinical interview used to diagnose PTSD as well as monitor PTSD symptoms. Questions address the traumatic event(s), symptom duration, subjective distress, impact on functioning, dissociation, and symptom improvement since last evaluation. During the Acute Phase, CAPS-V will be used to determine the rapid efficacy of dm-PFC accel-TMS compared to sham accel-TMS at approximately one-week post-treatment
Assessment of symptoms during the preceding week.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-V (CAPS-V) to determine superior symptom reduction
A 30-item clinical interview used to diagnose PTSD as well as monitor PTSD symptoms. Questions address the traumatic event(s), symptom duration, subjective distress, impact on functioning, dissociation, and symptom improvement since last evaluation. During the Extension Phase, CAPS-V will be used to determine whether an additional week of left dl-PFC accel-TMS provides superior reduction of PTSD symptoms compared to one week of left dl-PFC accel-TMS.
Assessment of symptoms during the preceding week.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-V (CAPS-V) to characterize durability of accel-TMS effects
Assessment of symptoms during the preceding week before each follow-up visit.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-V (CAPS-V) to determine superior outcomes between active left dl-PFC and active dm-PFC accel-TMS
Assessment of symptoms during the preceding week.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-V (CAPS-V) to determine added benefit during Extension
Assessment of symptoms during the preceding week.
Study Arms (5)
Arm 1: active left dl-PFC accel-TMS
ACTIVE COMPARATORAcute Phase: Eligible participants will be randomized into one of the three treatment groups: active left dl-PFC accel-TMS vs. active dm-PFC accel-TMS vs. sham dl-PFC/dm-PFC accel TMS
Arm 2:active dm-PFC accel-TMS
ACTIVE COMPARATORAcute Phase: Eligible participants will be randomized into one of the three treatment groups: active left dl-PFC accel-TMS vs. active dm-PFC accel-TMS vs. sham dl-PFC/dm-PFC accel TMS
Arm 3 - sham accel-TMS dl-PFC
SHAM COMPARATORAcute Phase: Eligible participants will be randomized into one of the three treatment groups: active left dl-PFC accel-TMS vs. active dm-PFC accel-TMS vs. sham dl-PFC/dm-PFC accel TMS
Arm 4: sham accel -TMS dm-PFC
SHAM COMPARATORAcute Phase: Eligible participants will be randomized into one of the three treatment groups: active left dl-PFC accel-TMS vs. active dm-PFC accel-TMS vs. sham dl-PFC/dm-PFC accel TMS
Arm 5
ACTIVE COMPARATORExtension phase, all participants will receive active left dl-PFC accel-TMS.
Interventions
One side of the coil is the active and the other is sham. The B70 AP coil will be positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dl-PFC).
One side of the coil is the active and the other is sham. The B70 AP coil will be positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dl-PFC).
One side of the coil is the active and the other is sham. The cool D-B80 AP coil will be positioned over the midline (bilateral) dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) using location 25.8% distance from nasion to inion.
One side of the coil is the active and the other is sham. The cool D-B80 AP coil will be positioned over the midline (bilateral) dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) using location 25.8% distance from nasion to inion.
The treatment will be the same as the left dl-PFC accel-TMS dl-PFC except that the Cool B70 Treatment coil only has an active treatment coil.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults age 18 years to 65 years old.
- Meets DSM-5 criteria for PTSD with a PCL-5 score \> 33
- No changes in psychotropic medication (if taking psychotropic medication) and/or changes in supportive psychotherapy for 1 month prior to initial visit; and clinically appropriate to maintain stable treatment regimen for duration of trial.
- Clinically competent to give informed written consent and ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Medical contraindication for neuromodulation (e.g., ferrous metal in head, seizure disorder, brain tumor, stroke, aneurysm, multiple sclerosis, etc.).
- Active substance use disorder in last 3 months or any current substance use that puts the participant at increased risk or significant impairment.
- Dementia or other cognitive disorder making unable to engage in treatment.
- Any history or diagnosis of Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Delusional Disorder or other psychotic illness that precludes safe participation in trial.
- Suicidal risk that precludes safe participation defined as clinical impression that the participant is at significant risk for suicide.
- OCD cannot be the primary disorder but can have OCD symptoms.
- Inability to stop taking any medication that significantly lowers the seizure threshold (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, clozapine, etc.)
- Current, planned, or suspected pregnancy
- Unstable medical conditions or any current medical condition that could preclude being able to safely participate in TMS treatment (e.g., unstable metabolic abnormality, unstable angina, etc.)
- Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
- We will exclude non-English speakers because of the need for rapid communication during the delivery of treatments.
- Significant ongoing litigation or claims that impact research activities, as determined by the research study team. (Research may especially be impacted when mental health or pain is being evaluated for litigation or claims, such as civil and criminal cases, disability claims and worker's compensation).
- Prior known active TMS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or dorsomedial prefrontal cortex or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Florida State Universitylead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Florida State University
Tallahassee, Florida, 32306, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frank A Kozel, MD
Florida State University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding Procedures The participants, PI, Research Staff involved in TMS treatment, and staff performing the study procedures will be blinded to the participant's dl-PFC protocol assignment throughout the study.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2024
First Posted
August 9, 2024
Study Start
November 6, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2028
Last Updated
May 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share