Observation on the Efficacy of Improving Ankle Dorsiflexion Limitation in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to design a randomized controlled trial to treat plantar fasciitis by combining conventional rehabilitation with the improvement of ankle dorsiflexion function, and to explore its clinical efficacy by combining various evaluation indicators. Compared with conventional plantar fasciitis, ankle dorsiflexion function rehabilitation training focuses more on the improvement of patients\' foot and ankle function. Conventional PF rehabilitation training focuses on loosening the plantar fascia and gastrocnemius muscle, which can restore the elasticity of the plantar fascia and promote pain relief, but has limited improvement in ankle dorsiflexion function, resulting in patients\' daily life such as walking, squatting, and going upstairs. Ankle dorsiflexion function rehabilitation training is an intervention directly targeting the function of the foot and ankle joint. By restoring the ankle dorsiflexion function of patients, it helps patients correct the force line in daily life movements, reduce the probability of sports injury risk, and improve sports performance and daily life satisfaction. Conventional rehabilitation for plantar fasciitis mainly focuses on relaxing the plantar fascia, gastrocnemius muscle, and plantar flexor muscle strength and strengthening the small muscle group exercises of the plantar foot. The experimental group directly intervened and conducted rehabilitation training for the limited ankle dorsiflexion function. It mainly includes subtalar joint loosening (increasing joint activity space), plantar flexor muscle group relaxation (releasing antagonist muscle tension), ankle dorsiflexor muscle strengthening (enhancing agonist muscle strength), and integrated exercises (integrating ankle dorsiflexion function into gait training). This experiment lasted for a total of eight weeks, and patients were required to complete five home rehabilitation training sessions per week.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2025
CompletedAugust 7, 2024
May 1, 2024
10 months
August 4, 2024
August 4, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Vicon 3D gait test
The subjects wore sports shorts, fully exposing the waist and the area below the mid-thigh. After the reflective markers were fixed, the subjects first familiarized themselves with the requirements and process of collecting movements according to the test procedures. The subjects stood in the center of the test room, with their feet shoulder-width apart and their upper limbs naturally placed on both sides of the body. They kept the subtalar joint in a neutral position and conducted three static tests to collect static data for defining the coordinate system of the bone segments. Afterwards, the subjects performed walking and jogging tests at the speed they felt most comfortable. The interval between the two tests was based on the patient not feeling tired. 5 valid data were collected for each action, and the average value of the 5 tests was used for analysis.
40min
Plantar fascia thickness measurement
The Japanese KONICA MINOLTA musculoskeletal ultrasound was used for testing, with a probe frequency of 3 to 18 Hz. Experienced clinicians were selected to perform the measurements. The patients were placed in a prone position with their ankle joints in a neutral position. The calcaneus and plantar fascia junction were measured. The doctor measured the plantar fascia thickness on the affected side of the patient, and the average value of three ultrasound measurement images was selected each time.
20min
Ankle dorsiflexion angle measurement
Ankle dorsiflexion angle in supine straight knee position and in lunge with bent knee position
10min
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Ankle and hindfoot function rating scale
10min
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain
20min
Plantar pressure test
20min
Study Arms (2)
Plantar Fasciitis Test Group
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group received intervention and rehabilitation training directly for the limited ankle dorsiflexion function, which mainly included subtalar joint loosening (increasing the joint activity space), plantar flexor muscle group relaxation (releasing the tension of antagonist muscles), ankle dorsiflexor muscle strengthening (enhancing the strength of agonist muscles), and integrated exercises (integrating ankle dorsiflexion function into gait training).
Plantar fasciitis conventional rehabilitation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional rehabilitation for plantar fasciitis mainly focuses on relaxing the plantar fascia, gastrocnemius and plantar flexor muscles and strengthening the small muscle groups of the plantar foot.
Interventions
The experimental group received intervention and rehabilitation training directly for the limited ankle dorsiflexion function, which mainly included subtalar joint loosening (increasing the joint activity space), plantar flexor muscle group relaxation (releasing the tension of antagonist muscles), ankle dorsiflexor muscle strengthening (enhancing the strength of agonist muscles), and integrated exercises (integrating ankle dorsiflexion function into gait training).
The experimental group received intervention and rehabilitation training directly for the limited ankle dorsiflexion function, which mainly included subtalar joint loosening (increasing the joint activity space), plantar flexor muscle group relaxation (releasing the tension of antagonist muscles), ankle dorsiflexor muscle strengthening (enhancing the strength of agonist muscles), and integrated exercises (integrating ankle dorsiflexion function into gait training).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age range: 30-60 years old; disease course \> 3 months; pain cannot be relieved by conservative treatment such as rest, oral nonsteroidal drugs, and physical therapy; VAS score is less than 6 points.
- According to the clinical practice guidelines of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Heel Pain/Plantar Fasciitis: 2014 Revision \[16\], patients meet the clinical diagnostic criteria for PF, mainly including pain on the medial side of the plantar, heel pain caused by recent weight-bearing activities, pain on palpation of the proximal attachment of the plantar fascia, and positive Windlass test;
- Supine straight knee ankle dorsiflexion angle \<10°; lunge knee flexion \<40° \[50, 51\]; left and right foot dorsiflexion difference does not exceed 1°.
- BMI between 18.5-23.9 (Chinese standard)
You may not qualify if:
- \- (1) Those who have received local injections of steroids in the past 3 months; (2) Those with other foot, ankle and lower leg diseases: history of surgery, fracture, trauma, plantar skin ulcers, rheumatism or rheumatoid arthritis, etc.; (3) Those with serious medical diseases: such as blood diseases, coagulopathy, severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular dysfunction, tumor diseases, etc.
- (4) Those with peripheral neuropathy (idiopathic, diabetic, nutritional); L5/S1 neural foramen impingement or lumbar spinal stenosis (5) Congenital structural flat feet, equinus deformity or other foot and ankle joint diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2024
First Posted
August 7, 2024
Study Start
May 20, 2024
Primary Completion
March 2, 2025
Study Completion
March 2, 2025
Last Updated
August 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share