PICC-ports Versus Chest - Ports for Long Term Chemotherapy Deliverance in Oncology Patients
PICCHEST
1 other identifier
interventional
852
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Central venous access devices are extensively used in oncology patients. The current standard is represented by devices inserted by direct ultrasound guided cannulation of deep veins of supra/infraclavicular area with a reservoir placed in a subcutaneous pocket of the upper chest wall ("chest-ports"). More recently, PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters)-ports have been proposed as an alternative to chest-ports. Aim of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of PICC ports compared to thoracic ports in terms of efficacy and safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2026
CompletedNovember 19, 2024
July 1, 2024
1.2 years
August 2, 2024
November 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of device failures
Number of unscheduled removal of the device due to complications
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of adverse events associated to device
6 months
Study Arms (2)
PICC-port arm
EXPERIMENTALImplantation of a PICC-port device
Chest-port arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORImplantation of a Chest-port device
Interventions
Implantation of a PICC-port device by a dedicated PICC team member following predefined evidence-based international guidelines and protocols
Implantation of a Chest-port device by expert physicians or certified expert nurses, following predefined evidence-based international guidelines and protocols
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 Age ≤ 75 yrs
- Histologic diagnosis of a solid tumour
- Need for intravenous , long term (\> 3 months), intermittent chemotherapy (either adjuvant or palliative)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status: 0-2
You may not qualify if:
- Active infections
- Coagulopathy, defined as platelet count \< 50,000/μL and/or Prothrombin time (PT)/International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.5
- Chronic severe renal failure, stage 3b-4-5 or imminent need for a dialysis fistula
- Any conditions contraindicating chemotherapy treatments, as valued by treating oncologist
- Life expectancy \< 6 months, as valued by treating oncologist
- Inability to give an informed consent and/or history of psychiatric or addictive disorder or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the trial requirements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
CRO (Centro di Riferimento Oncologico)
Aviano, 33081, Italy
Ospedale Careggi
Florence, 50134, Italy
European Institute of Oncology
Milan, 20141, Italy
Related Publications (10)
Gallieni M, Pittiruti M, Biffi R. Vascular access in oncology patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Nov-Dec;58(6):323-46. doi: 10.3322/CA.2008.0015. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
PMID: 18971486BACKGROUNDBiffi R, Pozzi S, Bonomo G, Della Vigna P, Monfardini L, Radice D, Rotmensz N, Zampino MG, Fazio N, Orsi F. Cost effectiveness of different central venous approaches for port placement and use in adult oncology patients: evidence from a randomized three-arm trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3725-31. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3784-5. Epub 2014 May 20.
PMID: 24841352BACKGROUNDBiffi R, Toro A, Pozzi S, Di Carlo I. Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved? Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jun;22(6):1705-14. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2208-1.
PMID: 24659216BACKGROUNDBertoglio S, Cafiero F, Meszaros P, Varaldo E, Blondeaux E, Molinelli C, Minuto M. PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Vasc Access. 2020 Jul;21(4):460-466. doi: 10.1177/1129729819884482. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
PMID: 31674857BACKGROUNDBertoglio S, Annetta MG, Brescia F, Emoli A, Fabiani F, Fino M, Merlicco D, Musaro A, Orlandi M, Parisella L, Pinelli F, Reina S, Selmi V, Solari N, Tricarico F, Pittiruti M. A multicenter retrospective study on 4480 implanted PICC-ports: A GAVeCeLT project. J Vasc Access. 2022 Jan 17:11297298211067683. doi: 10.1177/11297298211067683. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 35034480BACKGROUNDNickel B, Gorski L, Kleidon T, Kyes A, DeVries M, Keogh S, Meyer B, Sarver MJ, Crickman R, Ong J, Clare S, Hagle ME. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 9th Edition. J Infus Nurs. 2024 Jan-Feb 01;47(1S Suppl 1):S1-S285. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000532. No abstract available.
PMID: 38211609BACKGROUNDLi G, Zhang Y, Ma H, Zheng J. Arm port vs chest port: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jul 3;11:6099-6112. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S205988. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31308748BACKGROUNDLiu Y, Li LL, Xu L, Feng DD, Cao Y, Mao XY, Zheng J, Jin F, Chen B. Comparison between Arm Port and Chest Port for Optimal Vascular Access Port in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 13;2020:9082924. doi: 10.1155/2020/9082924. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32104708BACKGROUNDAnnetta MG, Bertoglio S, Biffi R, Brescia F, Giarretta I, Greca A, Panocchia N, Passaro G, Perna F, Pinelli F, Pittiruti M, Prisco D, Sanna T, Scoppettuolo G. Management of antithrombotic treatment and bleeding disorders in patients requiring venous access devices: A systematic review and a GAVeCeLT consensus statement. J Vasc Access. 2022 Jul;23(4):660-671. doi: 10.1177/11297298211072407. Epub 2022 May 9.
PMID: 35533088BACKGROUNDBiffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Pace U, Bonomo G, Monfardini L, Della Vigna P, Rotmensz N, Radice D, Zampino MG, Fazio N, de Braud F, Andreoni B, Goldhirsch A. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 2009 May;20(5):935-40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn701. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
PMID: 19179550BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roberto Biffi, MD
European Istitute of Oncology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2024
First Posted
August 7, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion
February 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07