NCT06541236

Brief Summary

According to the scientific literature, the loss of any tooth can be accompanied by a pronounced resorption of the alveolar ridge in the corresponding area, which leads to the formation of various defects. In the post-extraction period, bone tissue resorption 4 months after tooth extraction is up to 45% horizontally and 43% vertically.Despite the considerable amount of research on this problem, the improvement of pre-implantation preparation of patients with adentia after tooth extraction continues to be an extremely urgent task. The solution to this problem requires a comprehensive approach based on a unified assessment of the success of dental implantation in the post-extraction zone. The aim of our study is to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of osteoplastic materials after preservation of the extraction wells of extracted teeth. The null hypothesis is that the ADM technique can be used in patients and the newly formed bone regenerate will be sufficient for implant placement.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2019

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2021

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 2, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2024

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

August 2, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 2, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Level of bone persorption after Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autologous Dentin Matrix

    3 and 6 months after surgery

Study Arms (1)

Use of different bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge preservation of the socket

EXPERIMENTAL

All patients (n=80) were divided into 4 equal groups depending on the used preservative material. A total of 151 teeth were extracted. In the 1st group, the preservation was carried out using the Cerabone xenograft (Botiss, Germany). In the 2nd group, Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) was used, obtained from the patient's venous blood 20-30 minutes before the tooth extraction (BTI Endoret, Spain). The third group consisted of patients who underwent preservation of the extracted tooth socket with crushed autologous dentin matrix (ADM) obtained from their own tooth using Smart Dentin Grinder (KometaBio Inc., USA). In the 4th group, a material based on hydroxyapatite "Kollapan-L" with lincomycin (Intermedapatit, Russia) was used as a preservation graft

Procedure: Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autologous Dentin Matrix

Interventions

Incorporation of various bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge preservation

Use of different bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge preservation of the socket

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • To be included in the study, the treatment plan was discussed with each patient before surgery and an informed release form approved by the ethics committee was signed. Moreover, they met the following criteria: 1) Age from 18-70 years, 2) The presence of indications for tooth extraction: periapical periodontitis, fracture of the root or crown of the tooth without the possibility of rehabilitation, chronic periodontitis, 3) satisfactory oral hygiene.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients under 18 years of age, pregnant women, and patients with severe comor-bidity in the stage of decompensation were not included in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Moscow State Univerciry of medicine and dentistry

Moscow, 123022, Russia

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Nikolai Redko, PhD

CONTACT

Alexei Drobyshev

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: . The study included 80 patients in need of extraction of tooth and further dental im-plantation following proposed inclusion criteria. After selection, complex oral rehabil-itation was carried out to restore chewing function. All patients (n=80) were divided into 4 equal groups depending on the used preservative material.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Department of maxillo-facial and plastic sutgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2024

First Posted

August 7, 2024

Study Start

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion

July 1, 2021

Study Completion

September 1, 2024

Last Updated

August 7, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations