NCT06535984

Brief Summary

Eye examinations for vision screening in infants cause pain and stress. Aim: To evaluate the effect of white noise and swaddling on pain, heart rate, and oxygen saturation in term infants undergoing post-discharge eye examinations. This study was conducted with term infants born 30-36 days postpartum who visited the ophthalmologic outpatient clinic for eye screening. A total of 120 term infants were included in the sample, divided into three intervention groups: the white noise group (n=30), the swaddling group (n=30), and the white noise + swaddling group (n=30), along with a control group (n=30). Data were collected by the clinic nurse before the eye examination, 30 seconds into the examination, and at the end of the examination. The Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scale and pulse oximetry were used for data collection.There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores, heart rates, or oxygen saturation (SpO2) between the intervention and control groups (p\>0.05). In all groups, pain scores and heart rates were higher, and SpO2 values were lower after the ophthalmologic examination than before the examination (p\<0.001).Swaddling + white noise, white noise, and swaddling during the eye examination procedure did not affect reducing infants' pain or improving heart rate and oxygen saturation values.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 24, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2023

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 15, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 5, 2024

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 2, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

July 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 31, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Eye examinationİnfantPainNonpharmacologic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The Premature Infant Pain Profile total pain score

    The Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP); The scale assesses seven items: gestational age, behavioral status, highest heart rate, lowest oxygen saturation value, forehead wrinkling, squinting, and widening of the wings of the nose. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 (from good to bad), with higher scores indicating greater pain. The total PIPP score ranges from 0 to 21, where 0-6 points indicate mild pain, 7-12 points indicate moderate pain, and 13-21 points indicate severe pain

    Eye examination beginning and end (approximately 1-1.5 minutes)

  • heart rate value

    Eye examination beginning and end (approximately 1-1.5 minutes)

  • oxygen saturation value

    Eye examination beginning and end (approximately 1-1.5 minutes)

Study Arms (4)

white noise

EXPERIMENTAL

In the research, white noise was provided to the experimental group

Other: White Noise

swaddling

EXPERIMENTAL

In the research, swaddling was provided to the experimental group

Other: Swaddling

White Noise + Swaddling group

EXPERIMENTAL

In the research, White Noise + Swaddling group were provided to the experimental group

Other: White Noise+Swaddling

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

The control group received routine care

Interventions

White Noise Group (n=30) The third researcher turned on white noise (rain sound; link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZeM-HZeneo) before the start of the eye examination and played it to the infants until the end of the examination.

white noise

Swaddling group (n=30) The third researcher swaddled each infant with its thin blanket. The swaddling involved bringing the infant's left hand close to the left buttock and wrapping it with the upper right end of the blanket. Similarly, she wrapped the baby's right hand with the upper left end of the blanket by bringing it closer to the right hip. She wrapped the baby's legs with the lower part of the blanket, ensuring that the baby's head could move freely.

swaddling

White Noise + Swaddling Group (n=30) The third researcher swaddled the infants in this group as described in the swaddling group and turned on the white noise (rain sound; link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZeM-HZeneo) before the examination started and played it to the infants until the examination was over.

White Noise + Swaddling group

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Days - 36 Days
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • infants with a gestational age of \>37 6/7 weeks,
  • birth weight ≥2000 g,
  • th minute Apgar score ≥7,
  • aged 30-36 days postpartum,
  • undergoing their first eye examination

You may not qualify if:

  • a history of hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit,
  • postnatal resuscitation,
  • presence or suspicion of a congenital and/or genetic disease,
  • hearing problems, surgical operation for any reason,
  • systemic analgesic administration within the last six hours.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sultan Güner Başara

Tokat Province, Erbaa, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Sultan Güner Başara, Dr

    Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University Erbaa Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Child Health and Diseases, Tokat, Türkiye

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Hüsniye Çalışır, Prof. Dr.

    Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Nursing Child Health and Diseases Nursing , Aydın, Turkey

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Emel Bahadır Arsu, Nurse

    Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Özdemir Özdemir, Prof. Dr.

    Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
In the data collection process, the person collecting data was not blinded.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were divided into four groups: three intervention groups and one control group. Infants were assigned to these groups using simple random sampling to ensure homogeneity and prevent selection bias. The sample size was calculated using the G-Power 3.0.10 program. With a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, α = 0.05, effect size = 0.159, and power (1 - β) = 0.80, a total sample size of 108 was calculated for the four groups, with at least 27 infants in each group. The study included 120 infants divided into the swaddling group (n=30), white noise group (n=30), white noise + swaddling group (n=30), and control group (n=30)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Erbaa Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2024

First Posted

August 2, 2024

Study Start

October 24, 2022

Primary Completion

April 30, 2023

Study Completion

May 15, 2023

Last Updated

August 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no web address with additional information about the IPD sharing plan

Locations