Antibiotic Prophylaxis for EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
PrePaCyst
Prevention of Infection After EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A French Multicenter Prospective Comparative Observational Study
1 other identifier
observational
1,702
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Large prospective comparative observational study in numerous reference centers in France, comparing infectious complications in patients admitted for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspiration performed with or without antibiotic prophylaxis (ATBp) according to the usual practices. This is a prospective, comparative, observational, multicenter study, with the primary objective of comparing the infection rates in pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspirated under EUS, with and without the administration of ATBp. A sample size of 1702 patients will be needed over a 3-year study period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2024
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2027
August 2, 2024
August 1, 2024
3 years
July 28, 2024
August 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post EUS-FNA PCL infection rate
Post-EUS-FNA infection rate of PCL (patients exhibiting clinical and biological signs - fever \>38.5°C, neutrophilic leukocytosis, elevated CRP, pathogen identification in blood cultures - indicative of sepsis requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy). The occurrence of the aforementioned clinical and biological signs, along with imaging evidence (such as cyst wall thickening or presence of intracystic air images) and the absence of another infection source (urinary, pulmonary, venous, etc.) will lead to the diagnosis of post-FNA infection. Centralized validation of infection cases will be conducted by an expert panel based on clinical, biological, and imaging findings.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Rate of urinary infectious complications
30 days
Rate of post-ATBp allergic reactions
30 days
Duration and extension of hospitalization
30 days
Diameter of the needle used for EUS-FNA
1 days
Associated procedures (confocal endomicroscopy or intracystic biopsy)
1 days
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EUS-FNA for PCL with ATBp
Patients undergoing EUS-FNA for pancreatic cystic lesions WITH ATBp
EUS-FNA for PCL without ATBp
Patients undergoing EUS-FNA for pancreatic cystic lesions without ATBp
Interventions
Puncture of pancreatic cystic lesion with a fine needle under EUS guidance
Antibiotic prophylaxis consists of a single intravenous administration before or at the beginning of the procedure according to the common practices of each practitioner or unit
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with pancreatic cystic lesions for whom an EUS-FNA is indicated
You may qualify if:
- Patient referred for diagnostic aspiration of a pancreatic cystic lesion
- Patient aged 18 years or older
- Patient with ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3 status
- No participation in another concurrent clinical study
You may not qualify if:
- Patient under 18 years old
- Patient with ASA 4 or ASA 5 status
- Pregnant woman
- Patient with coagulation disorders preventing the performance of an EUS-FNA: PT \< 50%, platelets \< 50,000/mm³, current effective anticoagulation, ongoing clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor treatment
- Patient unable to personally express non-opposition or legally protected adult
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinique Paris-Bercy
Charenton-le-Pont, 94220, France
Related Publications (8)
Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119219. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
PMID: 28898917RESULTFacciorusso A, Mohan BP, Tacelli M, Crino SF, Antonini F, Fantin A, Barresi L. Use of antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;14(10):999-1005. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1797486. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
PMID: 32674699RESULTFacciorusso A, Arevalo-Mora M, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Ramai D, Gkolfakis P, Loizzi D, Muscatiello N, Ambrosi A, Tartaglia N, Robles-Medranda C, Stasi E, Ofosu A, Crino SF. Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infection Rate after Endoscopic Ultrasound Through-the-Needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Cysts: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 16;12(1):211. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010211.
PMID: 35054378RESULTFacciorusso A, Buccino VR, Turco A, Antonino M, Muscatiello N. Antibiotics Do Not Decrease the Rate of Infection After Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cysts. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Aug;64(8):2308-2315. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05655-x. Epub 2019 May 7.
PMID: 31065897RESULTKlein A, Qi R, Nagubandi S, Lee E, Kwan V. Single-dose intra-procedural ceftriaxone during endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts is safe and effective: results from a single tertiary center. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(2):237-241. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0118. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
PMID: 28243046RESULTGuarner-Argente C, Shah P, Buchner A, Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Ginsberg GG. Use of antimicrobials for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective, comparative analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1244.
PMID: 21704808RESULTLee LS, Saltzman JR, Bounds BC, Poneros JM, Brugge WR, Thompson CC. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Mar;3(3):231-6. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00618-4.
PMID: 15765442RESULTColan-Hernandez J, Sendino O, Loras C, Pardo A, Gornals JB, Concepcion M, Sanchez-Montes C, Murzi M, Andujar X, Velasquez-Rodriguez J, Rodriguez de Miguel C, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Gines A, Guarner-Argente C. Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Not Required for Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions, Based on a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1642-1649.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
PMID: 31972236RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
David KARSENTI
Societe Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical doctor, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2024
First Posted
August 2, 2024
Study Start
September 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 15, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 15, 2027
Last Updated
August 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share