NCT06535490

Brief Summary

Large prospective comparative observational study in numerous reference centers in France, comparing infectious complications in patients admitted for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspiration performed with or without antibiotic prophylaxis (ATBp) according to the usual practices. This is a prospective, comparative, observational, multicenter study, with the primary objective of comparing the infection rates in pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspirated under EUS, with and without the administration of ATBp. A sample size of 1702 patients will be needed over a 3-year study period.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,702

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
18mo left

Started Sep 2024

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress53%
Sep 2024Oct 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2024

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2027

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2027

Last Updated

August 2, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

July 28, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

EUS-FNAPancreatic cystic lesionAntibiotic prophylaxis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post EUS-FNA PCL infection rate

    Post-EUS-FNA infection rate of PCL (patients exhibiting clinical and biological signs - fever \>38.5°C, neutrophilic leukocytosis, elevated CRP, pathogen identification in blood cultures - indicative of sepsis requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy). The occurrence of the aforementioned clinical and biological signs, along with imaging evidence (such as cyst wall thickening or presence of intracystic air images) and the absence of another infection source (urinary, pulmonary, venous, etc.) will lead to the diagnosis of post-FNA infection. Centralized validation of infection cases will be conducted by an expert panel based on clinical, biological, and imaging findings.

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Rate of urinary infectious complications

    30 days

  • Rate of post-ATBp allergic reactions

    30 days

  • Duration and extension of hospitalization

    30 days

  • Diameter of the needle used for EUS-FNA

    1 days

  • Associated procedures (confocal endomicroscopy or intracystic biopsy)

    1 days

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

EUS-FNA for PCL with ATBp

Patients undergoing EUS-FNA for pancreatic cystic lesions WITH ATBp

Procedure: EUS-FNADrug: ATBp

EUS-FNA for PCL without ATBp

Patients undergoing EUS-FNA for pancreatic cystic lesions without ATBp

Procedure: EUS-FNA

Interventions

EUS-FNAPROCEDURE

Puncture of pancreatic cystic lesion with a fine needle under EUS guidance

Also known as: EUS fine needle aspiration
EUS-FNA for PCL with ATBpEUS-FNA for PCL without ATBp
ATBpDRUG

Antibiotic prophylaxis consists of a single intravenous administration before or at the beginning of the procedure according to the common practices of each practitioner or unit

Also known as: Antibiotic prophylaxis
EUS-FNA for PCL with ATBp

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with pancreatic cystic lesions for whom an EUS-FNA is indicated

You may qualify if:

  • Patient referred for diagnostic aspiration of a pancreatic cystic lesion
  • Patient aged 18 years or older
  • Patient with ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3 status
  • No participation in another concurrent clinical study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient under 18 years old
  • Patient with ASA 4 or ASA 5 status
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patient with coagulation disorders preventing the performance of an EUS-FNA: PT \< 50%, platelets \< 50,000/mm³, current effective anticoagulation, ongoing clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor treatment
  • Patient unable to personally express non-opposition or legally protected adult

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinique Paris-Bercy

Charenton-le-Pont, 94220, France

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119219. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

  • Facciorusso A, Mohan BP, Tacelli M, Crino SF, Antonini F, Fantin A, Barresi L. Use of antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;14(10):999-1005. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1797486. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

  • Facciorusso A, Arevalo-Mora M, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Ramai D, Gkolfakis P, Loizzi D, Muscatiello N, Ambrosi A, Tartaglia N, Robles-Medranda C, Stasi E, Ofosu A, Crino SF. Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infection Rate after Endoscopic Ultrasound Through-the-Needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Cysts: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 16;12(1):211. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010211.

  • Facciorusso A, Buccino VR, Turco A, Antonino M, Muscatiello N. Antibiotics Do Not Decrease the Rate of Infection After Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cysts. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Aug;64(8):2308-2315. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05655-x. Epub 2019 May 7.

  • Klein A, Qi R, Nagubandi S, Lee E, Kwan V. Single-dose intra-procedural ceftriaxone during endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts is safe and effective: results from a single tertiary center. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(2):237-241. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0118. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

  • Guarner-Argente C, Shah P, Buchner A, Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Ginsberg GG. Use of antimicrobials for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective, comparative analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1244.

  • Lee LS, Saltzman JR, Bounds BC, Poneros JM, Brugge WR, Thompson CC. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Mar;3(3):231-6. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00618-4.

  • Colan-Hernandez J, Sendino O, Loras C, Pardo A, Gornals JB, Concepcion M, Sanchez-Montes C, Murzi M, Andujar X, Velasquez-Rodriguez J, Rodriguez de Miguel C, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Gines A, Guarner-Argente C. Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Not Required for Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions, Based on a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1642-1649.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationAntibiotic Prophylaxis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, NeedleBiopsyCytodiagnosisCytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisImage-Guided BiopsySpecimen HandlingUltrasonography, InterventionalUltrasonographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresInvestigative TechniquesChemopreventionDrug TherapyTherapeuticsPremedication

Study Officials

  • David KARSENTI

    Societe Française d'Endoscopie Digestive

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical doctor, Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2024

First Posted

August 2, 2024

Study Start

September 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2027

Last Updated

August 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations