Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions After 10 Years of Function
Cantilevers
1 other identifier
observational
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A retrospective examination was performed on patients who had received treatment with dental implants supporting a prosthesis with a cantilever extension for at least 10 years of function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2024
CompletedAugust 7, 2024
August 1, 2024
3 months
July 30, 2024
August 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean bone loss
Mean bone loss measured from the difference of the bone levels at time of implant placement compared to the time of examination
10 years at least
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Mean Probing Depth
10 years at least
Biologic complications
10 years at least
Technical complications
10 years at least
Interventions
A retrospective study on the radiographic and clinical findings of implant-supported dental prostheses with cantilever extensions in place and function for at least 10 years
Eligibility Criteria
The patient sample of this study is part of a retrospective evaluation of patients who received treatment with dental implants in a private periodontal practice environment between 2000 and 2013, with at least 10 years of functional loading of their prosthetic work. Patients who received Fixed Dental Prostheses with Cantilever Extension were included in this study sample
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years and over
- Systemic health or controlled medical conditions
- Periodontal health, either no periodontal disease, or previously treated periodontal disease and under a supportive periodontal maintenance (SPT) program
- Smokers were included but encouraged to enter a smoking cessation program
- Patients with bruxism or parafunctional habits were included.
You may not qualify if:
- Uncontrolled medical conditions
- Active uncontrolled periodontal disease
- Inability to present for the reevaluation appointment
- Immediate implant placement
- Cantilever units that were part of full-arch restorations
- Cantilever units that were connected to a single implant
- Non-existent opposing dentition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Dentistry
Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece
Related Publications (20)
Wennstrom J, Zurdo J, Karlsson S, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Lindhe J. Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1077-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00603.x.
PMID: 15560808RESULTSchmid E, Morandini M, Roccuzzo A, Ramseier CA, Sculean A, Salvi GE. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension. A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of at least 10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Dec;31(12):1243-1252. doi: 10.1111/clr.13672. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
PMID: 32991763RESULTAglietta M, Iorio Siciliano V, Blasi A, Sculean A, Bragger U, Lang NP, Salvi GE. Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):550-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02391.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
PMID: 22250868RESULTAraujo MG, Lindhe J. Peri-implant health. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S249-S256. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0424.
PMID: 29926949RESULTBaumer A, Toekan S, Saure D, Korner G. Survival and success of implants in a private periodontal practice: a 10 year retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01064-z.
PMID: 32228667RESULTBerglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
PMID: 29926491RESULTChappuis V, Buser R, Bragger U, Bornstein MM, Salvi GE, Buser D. Long-term outcomes of dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface: a 20-year prospective case series study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Dec;15(6):780-90. doi: 10.1111/cid.12056. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
PMID: 23506385RESULTDerks J, Schaller D, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan;95(1):43-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034515608832.
PMID: 26701919RESULTFrisch E, Wild V, Ratka-Kruger P, Vach K, Sennhenn-Kirchner S. Long-term results of implants and implant-supported prostheses under systematic supportive implant therapy: A retrospective 25-year study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):689-696. doi: 10.1111/cid.12944. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
PMID: 32969180RESULTGracis S, Michalakis K, Vigolo P, Vult von Steyern P, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:202-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x.
PMID: 23062143RESULTHalg GA, Schmid J, Hammerle CH. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):983-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01556.x.
PMID: 18828813RESULTHammerle CHF, Cordaro L, Alccayhuaman KAA, Botticelli D, Esposito M, Colomina LE, Gil A, Gulje FL, Ioannidis A, Meijer H, Papageorgiou S, Raghoebar G, Romeo E, Renouard F, Storelli S, Torsello F, Wachtel H. Biomechanical aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 4. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:326-331. doi: 10.1111/clr.13284.
PMID: 30306690RESULTKaroussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Bragger U, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Jun;14(3):329-39. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.000.00934.x.
PMID: 12755783RESULTLekholm U, Grondahl K, Jemt T. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(4):178-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00019.x.
PMID: 17100743RESULTMombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987 Dec;2(4):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 3507627RESULTPjetursson BE, Zarauz C, Strasding M, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the clinical outcomes of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:160-183. doi: 10.1111/clr.13362.
PMID: 30306682RESULTRenvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: Case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S304-S312. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0588.
PMID: 29926953RESULTRoccuzzo M, Bonino L, Dalmasso P, Aglietta M. Long-term results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients: 10-year data around sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Oct;25(10):1105-12. doi: 10.1111/clr.12227. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
PMID: 23865554RESULTRomeo E, Tomasi C, Finini I, Casentini P, Lops D. Implant-supported fixed cantilever prosthesis in partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Nov;20(11):1278-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01766.x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
PMID: 19709064RESULTStorelli S, Del Fabbro M, Scanferla M, Palandrani G, Romeo E. Implant-supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in fully edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Part II. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:275-294. doi: 10.1111/clr.13310.
PMID: 30306687RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ioannis Vouros, DDS, PhD
Professor of Periodontology
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2024
First Posted
August 2, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 30, 2024
Study Completion
July 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08