NCT06532721

Brief Summary

The aims of the study include (1) identifying genes associated with child development and developmental delay in Taiwan (2) comparing the differences and similarities between genetic biomarkers of development and developmental delay for children in Taiwan and children from other countries (3) employing precision medicine as the method for genetic screening or test and (4) tracking children's biological, psychological and social adjustment, especially for those who have early-onset developmental delay.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
525

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2022

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 30, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 1, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 29, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

July 30, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 27, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence

    Assess participant's intelligence. Verbal Comprehension Index: * Minimum Value :50 * Maximum Value : 150 * Interpretation : Higher score indicate better verbal reasoning, concept formation, and verbal comprehension abilities. Visual Spatial Index: * Minimum Value :50 * Maximum Value : 150 * Interpretation : Higher score indicate better visual-spatial reasoning and problem solving skills. Fluid Reasoning Index: * Minimum Value :50 * Maximum Value : 150 * Interpretation : Higher score indicate stronger abilities in abstract reasoning and problem solving skills. Working Memory Index: * Minimum Value :50 * Maximum Value : 150 * Interpretation : Higher score indicate better working memory, whic

    initial assessment

  • Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-Fourth Edition

    assess participant's intelligence.

    initial assessment

  • Cantab

    Assess participant's cognitive function Motor Screening Task: * Assess basic motor control and response to visual stimuli. * Measurement: Reaction time and movement time. * Faster response times indicate better motor function. Slower time suggest motor impairments or difficulties in visual processing. Paired Associates Learning: * Tests visual memory and new learning. * Measurement: Number of errors made during the task. * Higher error rated indicate poorer memory performance. Lower error rates suggest better visual memory and associative learning. Spatial Working Memory: * Assess the ability to retain and manipulate spatial information * Measurement: Number of errors and strategy scores. * Fewer errors and better strategy scores indicate better spatial working memory. Rapid Visual Information Processing: * Evaluates sustained attention and vigilance. * Measurements: Detection targets sequences within rapidly presented digits. * Higher hit rates and lower false

    initial assessment

  • Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised

    Assess participant's language function.

    initial assessment

  • Clancy Behavior Scale

    Help identifying autism symptoms. The scale covers multiple behavioral domains such as aggression, anxiety, social skills, attention and hyperactivity. The scale is administered as a questionnaire where parents, or caregivers rate the frequency and intensity of specific behaviors shown by the children. Responses are given on a Likert scale of 3. Minimum value: The scale's scoring system ranges from 0 (indicating no problematic behavior) to higher value of 2, depending on the number of items and the severity of the behavior assessed. Maximum value: The upper end of the scale is determined by the total number of items and the scoring format. Higher scores typically indicate more frequent or severe behavioral issues, while lower scores suggest fewer or less sever issues.

    initial assessment

  • Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, version IV

    screen ADHD symptoms.

    initial assessment

  • The Berry-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration

    Assess participant's motor function.

    initial assessment

  • Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers

    Assess participant's general development.

    initial assessment

  • Functional Independence Measure for Children

    Assess functional abilities of children and adolescents The WeeFIM includes three primary domains: * Self-care: Assesses the ability to perform basic self-care tasks independently. * Mobility: Measures the ability to move from one place to another and perform transfer. * Cognition: Evaluates cognitive abilities related to communication, social skills, and problem-solving. Rating scale: Each of the 18 items is rated on a 7-point scale based on the level of independence. Minimum Score: 18 (indicating complete dependence across all items) Maximum Score: 126 (indicating complete independence across all items) Higher score indicate greater functional independence, meaning the child requires less assistance to perform daily activities. Lower score indicate greater dependence, suggesting the child requires more assistance or is unable to perform certain tasks independently.

    initial assessment

  • Assessment of Preschool Children's Participation

    Assess participant's participation in every day tasks.

    initial assessment

  • Children Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and Preferences for Activity of Children

    Assess participant's participation in every day tasks. The CAPE and PAC are designed for children and adolescents aged 6 to 21 years. Both tools are typically administered through structured questionnaires or interviews, either in paper form or electronically. CAPE: Helps identify areas where a child may be under-participating, guiding interventions to encourage greater engagement in a wider variety of activities. PAC: Provides insight into activities the child is interested in but may not currently participate in, helping to tailor activities to their preferences. Scoring: CAPE: Higher diversity and intensity scores indicate more varied and frequent participation. Higher enjoyment scores indicate greater pleasure derived from activities. PAC: Higher scores indicate a stronger preference for specific activities.

    initial assessment

  • PedsQL TM

    Assess participant's quality of life. Core Scales: * Physical Functioning: Assesses difficulties with physical activities, such as walking, running, and participating in sports. * Emotional Functioning: Evaluates feelings of sadness, worry, and anger, as well as overall emotional well-being. * Social Functioning: Measures interactions with peers, the ability to make friends, and feelings or being excluded or bullied. * School Functioning: Assesses difficulties in paying attention in class, missing school due to illness, and keeping up with schoolwork. The PedsQl uses a 5-point likert scale for responses. Higher score indicate better health-related quality of life.

    initial assessment

Study Arms (2)

developmental disabilities group

this group recruited children with developmental disabilities

typical developmental group

This regoup recruited children with typical development

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

475 participants with developmental disabilities and 50 healthy participants

You may qualify if:

  • Consent signing
  • years old
  • Typical development or developmental disabilities

You may not qualify if:

  • Central Nervous disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Congenital disease
  • Sensory disorder such as blindness or hearing impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Taoyuan District, 241, Taiwan

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Developmental Disabilities

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • ChiaLing Chen

    Chang Gung University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Chia-Ling Chen, MDPhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2024

First Posted

August 1, 2024

Study Start

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion

November 30, 2025

Study Completion

November 30, 2025

Last Updated

August 29, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations