Calciying Tendinopathy of the Rotator Cuff: Barbotage Vs Shock Waves
BOTCH
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this block randomized prospective experimental longitudinal analytical clinical trial is to compare the mean differences in Visual analgesic scale (VAS) at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months depending on the treatment received, ultrasound-guided barbotage (US-PICT) or shock waves (ESWT), in patients with calcifying tendinopathies according to the lesion based on the Bianchi Martinolli classification, as well as to know if there are variations in functionality with the Latinen test, joint balance, patient global improvement impression scale (PGI-I), global improvement impression scale (CGI - GI). For this purpose, patients between 30 and 60 years old, with chronic shoulder pain for more than 3 months due only to calcifying tendinopathies who have not received these previous treatments will be selected. The main question to be answered is: Do patients with calcifying tendinopathies of the shoulder, in its different degrees, who have received as treatment barbottage, obtain the same VAS differences at 1 month, 3 month and 6 month as patients who received as treatment shock waves in the population? Patients will be sorted into two arms according to the Bianchi Martinoli classification (I or II/ III) and subsequently included in groups according to the treatment received. The decision to treat with one or the other therapy will be made randomly 1:1, depending on the treatment assigned to the previous patient. An initial consultation and 3 revisions (1 month, 3 months and 6 months) will be performed after the end of therapy. The following variables will be collected VAS, Lattinen test, joint balances (ROM) (flexion, abduction and external and internal rotation), PGI-I, CGI - GI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 23, 2025
CompletedNovember 25, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.9 years
July 19, 2024
November 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual analgesic pain scale (VAS)
The VAS will be measured in the initial consultation and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention and a new variable "VAS Difference" (DifVAS) will be created for each corresponding VAS level in the review consultations.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Latineen test
6 months
Patient Global Patient Improvement Impression Scale (PGI-I)
6 months
Global CGI - GI Impression of Global Improvement Scale (CGI - GI)
6 months
Shoulder joint balances (ROM)
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Type I calcifications
ACTIVE COMPARATORType I calcifications according to the Bianchi Martinoli classification
Type II/III calcifications
ACTIVE COMPARATORType II/III calcifications according to the Bianchi Martinoli classification
Interventions
ESWT, these will be given using a 15 mm transmitter in mode continuous with pressure at 3 bar, frequency 12Hz and 3000 impacts. The number of sessions will be between 4 - 8 depending on the patient's clinic with a break between sessions of 5 to 10 days.
US-PICT will be carried out with 1 session in which the following actions will be carried out: * First, a suprascapular nerve block will be performed with a corticosteroid and anesthetic (3 ml of bupivacaine) in an ultrasound-guided manner. * The calcification will then be infiltrated with 5 ml local lidocaine and preloaded physiological saline solution in an ultrasound-guided manner. * Finally, repeated suctions will be performed with physiological saline solution to extract calcium in an ultrasound-guided way.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 30 - 60 years.
- Omoalgia lasting more than 3 months.
- Radiographic and ultrasound visualization in both planes of calcification.
- Sizes \> 5 millimeters (mm).
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of another obvious cause of pain (joint degeneration, capsulitis, rotator cuff tendon tears...)
- Previously received barbotage or shock waves.
- Contraindication of therapies: infection, allergies to medications, cancer...
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, Córdoba, 14004, Spain
Related Publications (13)
Harvie P, Pollard TC, Carr AJ. Calcific tendinitis: natural history and association with endocrine disorders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;16(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
PMID: 17188907BACKGROUNDEjnisman B, Andreoli CV, Monteiro GC, Pocchini Ade C, Cohen C, Tortato S, Franklin MM, Machado AB, Cohen M. CALCIFYING TENDINOPATHY: A LOCAL OR A SYSTEMIC CONDITION? Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Dec 8;47(4):479-82. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30132-4. eCollection 2012 Jul-Aug.
PMID: 27047854BACKGROUNDChianca V, Albano D, Messina C, Midiri F, Mauri G, Aliprandi A, Catapano M, Pescatori LC, Monaco CG, Gitto S, Pisani Mainini A, Corazza A, Rapisarda S, Pozzi G, Barile A, Masciocchi C, Sconfienza LM. Rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: from diagnosis to treatment. Acta Biomed. 2018 Jan 19;89(1-S):186-196. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i1-S.7022.
PMID: 29350647BACKGROUNDGerdesmeyer L, Wagenpfeil S, Haake M, Maier M, Loew M, Wortler K, Lampe R, Seil R, Handle G, Gassel S, Rompe JD. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic calcifying tendonitis of the rotator cuff: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003 Nov 19;290(19):2573-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.19.2573.
PMID: 14625334BACKGROUNDRamon S, Espanol A, Yebra M, Morillas JM, Unzurrunzaga R, Freitag K, Gomez S, Aranzabal JR. [Current evidences in shockwave treatment. SETOC (Spanish Society of Shockwave Treatment) recommendations]. Rehabilitacion (Madr). 2021 Oct-Dec;55(4):291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.rh.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Mar 17. Spanish.
PMID: 33743978BACKGROUNDSanchez Lite I, Toribio Calvo B, Osorio Aira S, Romera de Blas C, Andres Garcia N. Treatment of calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff with ultrasound-guided puncture and aspiration. Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug 26:S0033-8338(21)00124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2021.07.005. Online ahead of print. English, Spanish.
PMID: 34456048BACKGROUNDGarcía A. Nicolás, Rosales L. Julio, Verdugo P. Marco Antonio. Tendinopatía cálcica: Etiopatogenia y evaluación por imágenes. Rev. chil. radiol. 2020 Jun; 26(2): 52-61.
BACKGROUNDGonzález-Escalada J. R., Camba A., Muriel C., Rodríguez M., Contreras D., Barutell C. de. Validación del índice de Lattinen para la evaluación del paciente con dolor crónico. Rev. Soc. Esp. 2012 Ago; 19(4): 181-188.
BACKGROUNDEstenne M, Yernault JC. The mechanism of CO2 retention in cardiac pulmonary edema. Chest. 1984 Dec;86(6):936-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.86.6.936.
PMID: 6437753BACKGROUNDBianchi S, Martinoli C. Extremidad superior. In: Ecografia Musculoesquelética; Baert A.L, Knauth M, Sartor K, editores; MARBAN; 2011; pp 159-294.
BACKGROUNDBerrigan W, Olufade O, Negron G, Easley K, Sussman WI. Calcific Tendinopathy of the Shoulder: A Retrospective Comparison of Traditional Barbotage Versus Percutaneous Ultrasonic Barbotage. Clin J Sport Med. 2022 Sep 1;32(5):458-466. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001039. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
PMID: 35533134RESULTLouwerens JK, Sierevelt IN, van Noort A, van den Bekerom MP. Evidence for minimally invasive therapies in the management of chronic calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1240-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
PMID: 24774621RESULTKim YS, Lee HJ, Kim YV, Kong CG. Which method is more effective in treatment of calcific tendinitis in the shoulder? Prospective randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided needling and extracorporeal shock wave therapy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Nov;23(11):1640-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
PMID: 25219475RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Javier Muñoz Paz, Medicine
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medicine ( Principal Investigator)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2024
First Posted
July 30, 2024
Study Start
January 8, 2024
Primary Completion
November 23, 2025
Study Completion
November 23, 2025
Last Updated
November 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share