AI-Enhanced Consent for Cataract Surgery
An Artificial-intelligence-powered Intervention to Aid the Informed Consent Process for Cataract Surgery for English Speaking and Bengali Speaking Patient Population Groups: A Mixed-methods Randomised Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This research focuses on enhancing the informed process for patients before undergoing cataract surgery. Currently, this process involves verbal discussions and written materials that may not fully address patients' understanding of the surgery, its risks, and benefits. This study aims to introduce an innovative approach using artificial intelligence (AI) to generate informative videos tailored to patients' needs, accounting for education level, ethnicity, and language barriers. Why is this important? Informed consent is not just a legal requirement; but it's a fundamental patient right. Ensuring patients truly understand their treatment options leads to better satisfaction, both from the patient and clinician's perspective. This study compares the effectiveness of AI-generated videos against traditional information delivery methods (information brochures). Patients scheduled for cataract surgery will experience either the new AI video approach or the standard process. The goal is to see if the videos lead to better understanding of the procedure and overall satisfaction. The investigators will be running the study in two parallel cohorts - with Cohort A involving an English speaking population, and Cohort B a Bengali speaking population with all patient facing materials translated into Bengali. This research is crucial for patients seeking clarity about cataract surgery, for doctors aiming to improve patient care, and for researchers exploring patient education innovations. Funded by the Medical Protection Society (MPS), the investigators hope this intervention has broader effects such as reducing the number of complaints and litigations, improving the efficiency of consenting for surgery and delivering information, and improving theatre utilisation by reducing last minute cancellations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 11, 2026
ExpectedJuly 30, 2024
July 1, 2024
1 year
July 5, 2024
July 25, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Information understanding and retention
Assessed via a 12-question multiple-choice quiz sent via text message one week after the initial appointment.
One week after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Patient Anxiety Level
Baseline; pre-intervention
Patient Anxiety Level
On day of surgery
Time and Motion Study
On day of surgery
Participant-reported engagement time with the information material
One week after intervention
Cancellation rates
Within 7 days of surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
AI-Generated Informative Videos
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive an AI-generated informative video. The video will provide comprehensive information about cataract surgery, including the procedure, risks, benefits, and postoperative care. The content will be generated using the Synthesia platform, which uses artificial intelligence to create realistic, photo-realistic digital avatars to deliver the information. The aim is to improve patient understanding, satisfaction, and reduce preoperative anxiety compared to traditional information delivery methods. The video will be produced in English for Cohort A, and translated into Bengali for Cohort B.
Standard Written Information Brochures
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will receive the standard information provided to patients undergoing cataract surgery, which consists of written information brochures. These brochures include comprehensive details about the cataract surgery procedure, potential risks, benefits, and postoperative care. The brochures are designed to provide all necessary information to help patients make an informed decision regarding their surgery. The leaflet will be supplied in English for Cohort A, and Bengali for Cohort B.
Interventions
Participants in the experimental arm will receive an AI-generated video designed to provide comprehensive information about cataract surgery. The video will cover key aspects of the procedure, including the nature of the surgery, potential risks, benefits, and postoperative care. The video will be produced in English for Cohort A, and translated into Bengali for Cohort B. The video will be delivered to participants via a secure link sent to their mobile devices or email. Patients can watch the video at their convenience, and they are encouraged to view it as many times as necessary to fully understand the information provided. The video link will be provided once after the initial clinic appointment, but patients can access and watch the video multiple times. The videos will be created using the Synthesia platform, which uses artificial intelligence to generate realistic, photo-realistic digital avatars that deliver the information in a personalized and engaging manner.
Participants in the control arm will receive traditional written information brochures about cataract surgery. These brochures are designed to deliver detailed and essential information in a clear and understandable format. The brochures will be handed to participants during their face-to-face clinic appointment. Patients can read the material at their convenience and keep it for future reference. These brochures follow standardized guidelines and recommendations to ensure that all relevant information is included and presented in an accessible manner. The leaflet will be supplied in English for Cohort A, and Bengali for Cohort B.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have capacity to consent
- Listed for first time cataract surgery
- English speakers for Cohort A
- Bengali speakers for Cohort B
You may not qualify if:
- Previously undergone cataract surgery
- Partner who has undergone cataract surgery
- Below the age of 18
- Unable to utilise a device for watching information videos and completing quiz
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Moorfields Eye Hospital Stratford
London, E15 4BQ, United Kingdom
Moorfields Eye Hospital
London, EC1V 2PD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (10)
Ali N, Little BC. Causes of cataract surgery malpractice claims in England 1995-2008. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;95(4):490-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.182774. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
PMID: 20805130BACKGROUNDZhang Y, Ruan X, Tang H, Yang W, Xian Z, Lu M. Video-Assisted Informed Consent for Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:9593631. doi: 10.1155/2017/9593631. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
PMID: 28191349BACKGROUNDShukla AN, Daly MK, Legutko P. Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
PMID: 22062774BACKGROUNDZhang MH, Haq ZU, Braithwaite EM, Simon NC, Riaz KM. A randomized, controlled trial of video supplementation on the cataract surgery informed consent process. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;257(8):1719-1728. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04372-5. Epub 2019 May 30.
PMID: 31144057BACKGROUNDWagner SK, Raja L, Cortina-Borja M, Huemer J, Struyven R, Keane PA, Balaskas K, Sim DA, Thomas PBM, Rahi JS, Solebo AL, Kang S. Determinants of non-attendance at face-to-face and telemedicine ophthalmic consultations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 20;108(4):625-632. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-322389.
PMID: 37217292BACKGROUNDBhan A, Dave D, Vernon SA, Bhan K, Bhargava J, Goodwin H; Medical Defence Union; Medical Protection Society; Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland. Risk management strategies following analysis of cataract negligence claims. Eye (Lond). 2005 Mar;19(3):264-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701493.
PMID: 15286671BACKGROUNDMathew RG, Ferguson V, Hingorani M. Clinical negligence in ophthalmology: fifteen years of national health service litigation authority data. Ophthalmology. 2013 Apr;120(4):859-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
PMID: 22386949BACKGROUNDAli N. A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology. BMC Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec 20;7:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-7-20.
PMID: 18096077BACKGROUNDGill ZS, Caldwell AS, Patnaik JL, Marin AI, Mudie LI, Grove N, Ifantides C, Ertel MK, Puente MA, Seibold LK. Comparison of cataract surgery outcomes in English proficient and limited English proficiency patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Jun 1;49(6):595-601. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001164.
PMID: 36779806BACKGROUNDPatel DN, Wakeam E, Genoff M, Mujawar I, Ashley SW, Diamond LC. Preoperative consent for patients with limited English proficiency. J Surg Res. 2016 Feb;200(2):514-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.033. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
PMID: 26541685BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Swan Kang, MBBS, MBioch (Oxon), FRCOphth
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Care Providers: The clinicians responsible for confirming consent on the day of surgery will be blinded to the group assignments of the patients. They will not know whether a patient received the AI-generated video or the standard written information brochure. Outcomes Assessors: The individuals assessing the outcomes, including patient understanding and satisfaction, as well as preoperative anxiety levels, will also be blinded to the group assignments. This includes the personnel administering and analyzing the multiple-choice questionnaires and anxiety scales. Participants: Participants will not be blinded as they will be aware of the type of information they received (AI-generated video or written brochure).
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2024
First Posted
July 30, 2024
Study Start
September 11, 2024
Primary Completion
September 11, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 11, 2026
Last Updated
July 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers. This decision is based on concerns about participant privacy and confidentiality, as well as the sensitive nature of the data collected in this study such as patient anxiety levels, and complaints and litigations. Instead, we will disseminate aggregated findings through peer-reviewed publications and presentations, ensuring the protection of participant identities while sharing valuable insights with the scientific community.