Readers' Attention of Shorter Versus Longer Abstracts of Systematic Reviews
1 other identifier
interventional
1,941
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to investigate the perceptions of researchers on systematic review (SR) abstracts. The primary objective will be to compare readers' attention of shorter versus longer abstracts. The secondary objective will be to assess the perception of an abstract based on four indicators of a well-written abstract: (a) Informativeness, (b) Accuracy, (c) Attractiveness, and (d) Conciseness. The study will involve researchers from all over the world who recently published an SR, regardless of their research field. To identify eligible authors, a search of MEDLINE (via PubMed) was conducted on May 5, 2024, for systematic reviews published between January 1, 2024, and March 26, 2024. A total of at least 6200 SRs will be selected from PubMed and assessed for eligibility. The corresponding author information will be extracted from all included SRs and randomized in a 1:1 ratio.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedNovember 8, 2024
November 1, 2024
2 months
July 18, 2024
November 7, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Trial participation
The primary outcome of this RCT will be the trial participation, which is defined as the proportion of participants who read the abstract and then clicked on the "Continue" button. This will be quantified by dividing the number of participants who read the abstract and proceeded to complete the survey by the total number of individuals who clicked on the link in the email. Information will be electronically captured in SoSci survey.
Immediately after reading the abstract
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Indicators of a well-written abstract
Immediately after reading the abstract
Other Outcomes (1)
Time needed to read the abstract
Immediately after reading the abstract
Study Arms (2)
Long Abstract
EXPERIMENTALAbstract length: 771 words
Short Abstract
ACTIVE COMPARATORAbstract length: 277 words
Interventions
The intervention and control group will be provided with a structured abstract of the review by Soderberg et al., entitled "Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones". This review was published once in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and once in the journal BJU International. The length of the abstract differs significantly depending on the journal. The participants assigned to this study arm will be presented with the longer version published in the Cochrane Database, comprising 771 words (PMID: 37955353).
The participants assigned to this study arm will be presented with the shorter version published in BJU International, comprising 277 words (PMID: 37942649).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systematic reviews of all types
You may not qualify if:
- No English abstract
- Other types of evidence syntheses (e.g. scoping reviews, methodological papers)
- Protocols
- Editorials
- Others: e.g. Corrections, retractions, erratums, or summaries of SRs
- No email address available
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
Oldenburg, Germany
Related Publications (5)
Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Abstract and Keywords. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jan 28;18(1):e100159. doi: 10.5812/ijem.100159. eCollection 2020 Jan.
PMID: 32308700BACKGROUNDMunn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4.
PMID: 29316881BACKGROUNDSoderberg L, Ergun O, Ding M, Parker R, Borofsky MS, Pais V, Dahm P. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
PMID: 37955353BACKGROUNDSoderberg L, Ergun O, Ding M, Parker R, Borofsky M, Pais V, Dahm P. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones: a Cochrane Review. BJU Int. 2024 Feb;133(2):132-140. doi: 10.1111/bju.16220. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
PMID: 37942649BACKGROUNDHelbach J, Wandscher K, Pieper D, Hoffmann F. Readers' attention to shorter versus longer abstracts of systematic reviews: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Oct 17:bmjebm-2024-113613. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113613. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41106849DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The participants will be blinded to the intervention. In the cover letter, participants will be informed that the study aims to examine the characteristics of an abstract. However, they will not be informed that the primary focus of this study is the influence of the abstract´s length. Furthermore, the participants will be not aware of the number of different abstracts that were randomly allocated.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2024
First Posted
July 29, 2024
Study Start
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
November 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share