NCT06522321

Brief Summary

The present study is a human, prospective, parallel, randomised controlled clinical trial conducted for radiographic assessment of bone dimension around immediate implants with FDBA and I-PRF vs FDBA Alone The trial is in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 15, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 25, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 25, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

July 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Injectable platelet rich fibrinbone dimensionsfreeze dried bone allograft

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Bone fill

    Standard digital radiographs were taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months by paralleling/long-cone technique. Radiographic images at all the time intervals were taken by using a metallic counting grid (IOPA film grid® , BlueDent, Chennai, India). The bone-fill was measured in square millimeters by point-counting the number of squares over newly developing radiopacities at different follow up periods. Squares that were half filled or unclear were not counted.

    At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  • Bone dimensions

    The sites will be assessed vertically and horizontally by CBCT images taken at baseline and 6 months after the implant placement.

    At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  • Bone density

    Bone mineral density is obtained by the CBCT (GENORAY (PAPAYA 3D premium operation software)

    At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  • Marginal bone level

    distance between reference point(the implant shoulder) and the first marginal bone-to-implant contact level using standard digital radiographs

    At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

  • Early wound healing index

    SCORE 1: COMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE NO FIBRIN LINE IN THE INTERPROXIMAL AREA SCORE 2: COMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE FINE FIBRIN LINE IN THEINTERPROXIMAL AREA SCORE 3: COMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE FIBRIN CLOT IN THE INTERPROXIMAL AREA SCORE 4:INCOMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE PARTIAL NECROSIS OF THE INTERPROXIMAL AREA SCORE 5: INCOMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE COMPLETE NECROSIS OF THE INTERPROXIMAL AREA. SCORE 1: COMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE NO FIBRIN LINE IN THE INTERPROXIMAL AREA SCORE 2: COMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE FINE FIBRIN LINE IN THEINTERPROXIMAL AREA SCORE 3: COMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE FIBRIN CLOT IN THE INTERPROXIMAL AREA SCORE 4:INCOMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE PARTIAL NECROSIS OF THE INTERPROXIMAL AREA SCORE 5: INCOMPLETE FLAP CLOSURE COMPLETE NECROSIS OF THE INTERPROXIMAL AREA. Wachet et al wound healing index will be used for obtaining the healing index

    At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • GINGIVAL INDEX

    3 months and 6 months

  • GINIVAL BLEEDING INDEX

    3 months and 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Radiographic Assessment of Bone Dimension Around Immediate with FDBA and i-PRF vs FDBA

EXPERIMENTAL

TEST GROUP: FDBA and I-PRF with immediate implant placement. Local anesthesia is given. Atraumatic extraction is done. I-PRF is prepared by centrifugation procedure. Osteotomy is done at the selected site after radiographic assessment. Immediate implant is placement along with I-PRF and FDBA. Suture is placed at the surgical site.

Biological: i-PRF and FDBA

Radiographic Assessment of Bone Dimensions Around Immediate Implants With FDBA and I-PRF vs FDBA

EXPERIMENTAL

CONTROL GROUP: FDBA alone with immediate implant placement. Local anesthesia is given. Atraumatic extraction is done.Osteotomy is done at the selected site after radiographic assessment. Immediate implant is placement along with FDBA alone. Suture is placed at the surgical site.

Biological: i-PRF and FDBA

Interventions

i-PRF and FDBABIOLOGICAL

A mucoperiosteal flap will be raised and atraumatic extraction will be done. An immediate implant with FDBA and I-PRF (experimental group) will be placed according to the standard protocol. An immediate implant with FDBA( comparative group) will be placed according to the standard protocol . The surgical wound closure will be coapted with sutures

Also known as: platelet rich fibrin and freeze dried bone
Radiographic Assessment of Bone Dimension Around Immediate with FDBA and i-PRF vs FDBARadiographic Assessment of Bone Dimensions Around Immediate Implants With FDBA and I-PRF vs FDBA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients between 18-55 years of age.
  • Presence of non-restorable single rooted teeth (maxillary or mandibular) due to trauma, caries, root resorption, root fracture, endodontic or periodontal failure.
  • Grade I or Grade II extraction socket according to El Chaar et al 2016.
  • Good oral hygiene.
  • Good patient compliance.

You may not qualify if:

  • Systemic complications (uncontrolled diabetes and severe cardiovascular or infectious diseases).
  • Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy.
  • Patients who are psychologically unable to participate.
  • Pregnant patients, patients with bone diseases and patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy, alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Patients with hemorrhagic disorders.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dr. Prabhuji MLV

Bengaluru, Karnataka, 562157, India

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteosclerosis

Interventions

proliferation regulatory factors, human urine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteochondrodysplasiasBone Diseases, DevelopmentalBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Dr Prabhuji MLV, MDS

    PROFESSOR AND HOD

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Purposive Sampling technique will be done. All the patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be screened and then 20 patients will be randomly allotted into either of the two groups. The treatment allocation to the test and control group will be assigned by means of a sealed envelope containing a code derived from a computer-generated randomized list to receive either - 1. TEST GROUP (n =10)- FDBA and PRF(i-prf) with immediate implant placement. 2. CONTROL GROUP (n = 10) - FDBA alone with immediate implant placement.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
HOD OF PERIODONTOLOGY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2024

First Posted

July 26, 2024

Study Start

July 15, 2023

Primary Completion

August 25, 2024

Study Completion

October 25, 2024

Last Updated

July 30, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations