Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Regional Anesthesia During S-ICD Implantation Procedure.
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our study consists of a combination of regional blockade ('local' anesthesia) of the anterior and lateral chest wall in the form of a thin needle prick and the supply of local anesthetic drugs to the area of the relevant chest wall structures to exclude all stimuli, including pain from the operative site. A short-acting analgesic and sedative drug will be administered intravenously throughout the procedure - in a dose that allows the required contact between the patient and the anesthetist. If necessary, the dose of the drug may be increased to maintain pain comfort throughout the procedure. The anesthetic team will be with the patient throughout the procedure to ensure comfort and safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 25, 2024
July 1, 2024
1.5 years
July 8, 2024
July 23, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
NRS
numerical pain scale 0-10 points
Checked at regular 15-minute intervals during the procedure and every 6 hours for the first 24 hours after the procedure
VAS
visual analogue scale 0-10 points
Checked at regular 15-minute intervals during the procedure and every 6 hours for the first 24 hours after the procedure
QoR - 15
post-operative quality of life and improvement scale 0-150 points
Administered to the patient before surgery and 24 hours after surgery
RASS
Richmond arousal/sedation scale) (-5 \<-\>+5) points
Checked at regular 15 minute intervals during the procedure
GCS
Glasgow level of consciousness score scales 3-15 points
Checked at regular 15 minute intervals during the procedure
EOA
Effectiveness of Anaesthesia) -scale (-3 do +3) points
Checked immediately after the procedure (last suture)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
SpO2
Monitored every 5 minutes during the procedure
NIBP
Monitored every 5 minutes during the procedure
HR
Monitored every 5 minutes during the procedure
Other Outcomes (2)
BMI
Before performing procedure
bioimpedance
beforeperforming procedure
Study Arms (2)
Group I (PSP+SSAP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup I will include patients undergoing PSP(Pectoserratus plane block)+SSAP(Superficial serratus anterior plane block) (20+40ml) The solution is defined as a combination of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60ml of liquid administered.
Group I (SPIP+SSAP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup II will include patients undergoing SPIP(Superficial parastenal intercostal plane block)+SSAP(Superficial serratus anterior plane block) (20+40ml) The solution is defined as a combination of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60ml of liquid administered.
Interventions
Prior to the procedure, the anaesthetists will receive an envelope from a person not related to the project (a hospital administrative staff member). This envelope will contain a randomly indicated method of anaesthesia based on simple randomisation. This will determine the type of regional block used during the procedure. It is important to note that the patient will not know which study group they have been classified in. Furthermore, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anaesthesia performed. This is to ensure double-blinding. In order to ensure the highest standards of objectivity, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed. This will allow us to assess the extent and quality of anaesthesia after the procedure, We will use a proprietary scale of subjective operator comfort scale.
administration under ultrasound guidance of a mixture of 2 local anaesthetics in a fixed total volume
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged 18-90 years requiring S-ICD implantation for cardiac indications,
- high risk of anesthesia (ASA II or higher), patients giving informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- absolute contraindications to regional anesthesia such as generalized coagulation disorders, inflammation at the site of anesthesia, allergy to the drugs used for regional anesthesia
- lack of consent of the patient for the conducted procedure,
- inability to cooperate with the patient - such as severe mental retardation, unregulated mental illness with motor agitation, advanced neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease/Alzheimer's,
- inability to give informed consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-981, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marek Szamborski, MD
Senior Assistant
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Anesthesiologists administering anesthesia prior to surgery receive an envelope with a randomly indicated method of anesthesia based on simple randomization determines the type of regional blockade used during the procedure). The subject will not know which study group he or she has been classified into. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anesthesia performed -\[randomization by double-blinding\]. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed in order to objectivize the extent and quality of the subject's anesthesia, which he will evaluate after the procedure according to a scale of subjective operator comfort created (EOA scale).
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Assistant, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2024
First Posted
July 25, 2024
Study Start
June 16, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07