Comparison Of Implant Position Achieved With Fully Guided Versus Partially Guided Implant Placement
Comparative Evaluation Of Accuracy Of Implant Position Achieved With Static Computer Assisted Fully Guided Implant Placement (sCAIP) And Conventional Cast Based Partially Guided Implant Placement (cPGIP)
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Globally implant therapy is currently accepted as a predictable, viable and successful option to replace missing teeth. Ample studies have shown excellent survival and clinical success rates of dental implants for various indications.The correct three-dimensional (3D) positioning of an implant is considered a prerequisite for an optimal outcome.Computer assisted implant surgery maybe beneficial in patients with limited bone and proximity to anatomic structures.Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to investigate the accuracy of implant position achieved with static CAIP(Computer Assisted Implant Placement) and to compare this with the accuracy of conventional cast based partially guided implant placement(cPGIP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 25, 2024
July 1, 2024
1.1 years
July 19, 2024
July 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of implant position
3D deviation of planned implant position to final implant position
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Implant placement by static computer assisted implant placement(fully guided).
EXPERIMENTALThe Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file from the CBCT examination and the Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file from the surface scan will be imported and merged in planning software .The virtual implant planning for all patients will be performed in 3shape software.Surgical guide with embedded sleeve will be designed and 3D printed using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology.Fit and stability of static CAD\\CAM surgical guide for test group will be verified through window areas of guide on top of the teeth.A flapless implant placement protocol will be performed for all implants.
Implant placement by conventional cast based partially guided implant placement(partially guided).
EXPERIMENTALA conventional acrylic stent with radiopaque marker (barium sulphate) will be fabricated which will serve as radiographic template.A CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) examination will be performed with the patient wearing radiographic template.The DICOM file will be then imported in planning software. Virtual implant planning will be performed in 3 shape software.A surgical stent will be produced in a conventional laboratory manner. A flapless implant placement protocol will be performed.
Interventions
Surgical guide is fabricated and fitted onto the patient's arch and implant is placed with guide in place.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients in need of replacement of missing teeth.
- Mouth opening at least 30 mm.
- Age\>18 years.
- Limited vertical or horizontal dimension of the alveolar ridge.
- Unfavorable bone morphology necessitating correct implant position.
- When minimally invasive (e.g. flapless) surgery is intended.
- When immediate implant restoration is planned.
You may not qualify if:
- Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day)
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Metabolic bone disorders
- History of radiotherapy of the head and neck
- Recent chemotherapy
- Use of drugs influencing bone or soft tissue healing (e.g., high doses of antiresorptive medication, steroids or anti-inflammatory drugs)
- Pregnant and/or lactating women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2024
First Posted
July 25, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
August 1, 2025
Study Completion
August 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07