Prospective Validation of Intraoperative Blood Pressure Monitors
PROMISES
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This observational study aims to identify the incidence and importance of discrepancies between measurements of intraoperative invasive and noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgeries under general anesthesia . The main questions it aims to answer are :
- The importance of the differences, in mmHg, between the non-invasive and invasive blood pressure measurements (NIBP-IBP) on systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure.
- Identify the predictive factors associated with these differences.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 25, 2024
July 1, 2024
1 year
July 9, 2024
July 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Difference between non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements
Describe the difference, in mm of Hg, between intraoperative monitoring of noninvasive and invasive blood (NIBP-IBP) on systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures
Time Frame: from arrival in preoperative unit patient's departure from PACU and/or removal of IBP device, expected duration approximately between 2 and 8 hours
Predictive factors associated with the between non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurement differences
Identify predictive factors (such as patient, surgery, and anesthesia characteristics) statistically associated with the appearance of NIBP-IBP measurement differences
Time Frame: From patient file analysis at time of recruitment until patient's departure from PACU and/or removal of IBP device, expected duration approximately a year.
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Comparison of preoperative NIBP and pre-induction NIBP
From installation of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) device in preop until installation of arterial line, pre-induction. Expected duration approximately between 1 and 2 hours.
Compare the discrepancies between non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements to the accuracy standards of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
From installation of patient's arterial line until removal of patient's arterial line, expected duration approximately between 1 and 8 hours.
Impact of patient comorbidities (age, weight, height, BMI, heart condition, vascular condition) on occurrences of discrepancies between non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements
From patient file analysis at time of recruitment until the end of statistical analysis. Expected duration: up to a year.
Statistical correlation between radial artery ultrasound measurements on the occurrence of discrepancies between non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements
From measurement of patient's radial artery via ultrasonography before induction until the end of statistical analysis. Expected duration: up to a year.
Statistical correlation between administration of vasoactive drugs and fluids on the occurrence of discrepancies between non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements
From administration of first fluid or vasoactive drug until patient's departure from PACU and/or removal of arterial line. Expected duration between 2 and 8 hours.
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients undergoing non-cardiac elective surgery expected to last at least 60 minutes, under general anesthesia, and to require an arterial line.
You may qualify if:
- Fully consented, adult patients above 18 years old;
- Undergoing surgery of duration time expected at least 60 minutes using general anesthesia;
- Supine positioning during the surgery;
- Surgery requiring an arterial line;
- Both arms available for instrumentation during the surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Atrial fibrillation, multifocal atrial tachycardia, or any other irregular hear rythm;
- Gradient of mean arterial pressure between the two arms greater than 5 mm Hg, as measured during the recruitment process.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital - CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Montreal East, Quebec, H1T2M4, Canada
Related Publications (22)
Meng L, Yu W, Wang T, Zhang L, Heerdt PM, Gelb AW. Blood Pressure Targets in Perioperative Care. Hypertension. 2018 Oct;72(4):806-817. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11688. No abstract available.
PMID: 30354725BACKGROUNDMascha EJ, Yang D, Weiss S, Sessler DI. Intraoperative Mean Arterial Pressure Variability and 30-day Mortality in Patients Having Noncardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):79-91. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000686.
PMID: 25929547BACKGROUNDTassoudis V, Vretzakis G, Petsiti A, Stamatiou G, Bouzia K, Melekos M, Tzovaras G. Impact of intraoperative hypotension on hospital stay in major abdominal surgery. J Anesth. 2011 Aug;25(4):492-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1152-1. Epub 2011 May 6.
PMID: 21547554BACKGROUNDSalmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Singh A, Sessler DI, Kurz A. Relationship between Intraoperative Hypotension, Defined by Either Reduction from Baseline or Absolute Thresholds, and Acute Kidney and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):47-65. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001432.
PMID: 27792044BACKGROUNDSun LY, Wijeysundera DN, Tait GA, Beattie WS. Association of intraoperative hypotension with acute kidney injury after elective noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):515-23. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000765.
PMID: 26181335BACKGROUNDWalsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, Kurz A, Turan A, Rodseth RN, Cywinski J, Thabane L, Sessler DI. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):507-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26.
PMID: 23835589BACKGROUNDvan Waes JA, van Klei WA, Wijeysundera DN, van Wolfswinkel L, Lindsay TF, Beattie WS. Association between Intraoperative Hypotension and Myocardial Injury after Vascular Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):35-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000922.
PMID: 26540148BACKGROUNDBotto F, Alonso-Coello P, Chan MT, Villar JC, Xavier D, Srinathan S, Guyatt G, Cruz P, Graham M, Wang CY, Berwanger O, Pearse RM, Biccard BM, Abraham V, Malaga G, Hillis GS, Rodseth RN, Cook D, Polanczyk CA, Szczeklik W, Sessler DI, Sheth T, Ackland GL, Leuwer M, Garg AX, Lemanach Y, Pettit S, Heels-Ansdell D, Luratibuse G, Walsh M, Sapsford R, Schunemann HJ, Kurz A, Thomas S, Mrkobrada M, Thabane L, Gerstein H, Paniagua P, Nagele P, Raina P, Yusuf S, Devereaux PJ, Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI, Walsh M, Guyatt G, McQueen MJ, Bhandari M, Cook D, Bosch J, Buckley N, Yusuf S, Chow CK, Hillis GS, Halliwell R, Li S, Lee VW, Mooney J, Polanczyk CA, Furtado MV, Berwanger O, Suzumura E, Santucci E, Leite K, Santo JA, Jardim CA, Cavalcanti AB, Guimaraes HP, Jacka MJ, Graham M, McAlister F, McMurtry S, Townsend D, Pannu N, Bagshaw S, Bessissow A, Bhandari M, Duceppe E, Eikelboom J, Ganame J, Hankinson J, Hill S, Jolly S, Lamy A, Ling E, Magloire P, Pare G, Reddy D, Szalay D, Tittley J, Weitz J, Whitlock R, Darvish-Kazim S, Debeer J, Kavsak P, Kearon C, Mizera R, O'Donnell M, McQueen M, Pinthus J, Ribas S, Simunovic M, Tandon V, Vanhelder T, Winemaker M, Gerstein H, McDonald S, O'Bryne P, Patel A, Paul J, Punthakee Z, Raymer K, Salehian O, Spencer F, Walter S, Worster A, Adili A, Clase C, Cook D, Crowther M, Douketis J, Gangji A, Jackson P, Lim W, Lovrics P, Mazzadi S, Orovan W, Rudkowski J, Soth M, Tiboni M, Acedillo R, Garg A, Hildebrand A, Lam N, Macneil D, Mrkobrada M, Roshanov PS, Srinathan SK, Ramsey C, John PS, Thorlacius L, Siddiqui FS, Grocott HP, McKay A, Lee TW, Amadeo R, Funk D, McDonald H, Zacharias J, Villar JC, Cortes OL, Chaparro MS, Vasquez S, Castaneda A, Ferreira S, Coriat P, Monneret D, Goarin JP, Esteve CI, Royer C, Daas G, Chan MT, Choi GY, Gin T, Lit LC, Xavier D, Sigamani A, Faruqui A, Dhanpal R, Almeida S, Cherian J, Furruqh S, Abraham V, Afzal L, George P, Mala S, Schunemann H, Muti P, Vizza E, Wang CY, Ong GS, Mansor M, Tan AS, Shariffuddin II, Vasanthan V, Hashim NH, Undok AW, Ki U, Lai HY, Ahmad WA, Razack AH, Malaga G, Valderrama-Victoria V, Loza-Herrera JD, De Los Angeles Lazo M, Rotta-Rotta A, Szczeklik W, Sokolowska B, Musial J, Gorka J, Iwaszczuk P, Kozka M, Chwala M, Raczek M, Mrowiecki T, Kaczmarek B, Biccard B, Cassimjee H, Gopalan D, Kisten T, Mugabi A, Naidoo P, Naidoo R, Rodseth R, Skinner D, Torborg A, Paniagua P, Urrutia G, Maestre ML, Santalo M, Gonzalez R, Font A, Martinez C, Pelaez X, De Antonio M, Villamor JM, Garcia JA, Ferre MJ, Popova E, Alonso-Coello P, Garutti I, Cruz P, Fernandez C, Palencia M, Diaz S, Del Castillo T, Varela A, de Miguel A, Munoz M, Pineiro P, Cusati G, Del Barrio M, Membrillo MJ, Orozco D, Reyes F, Sapsford RJ, Barth J, Scott J, Hall A, Howell S, Lobley M, Woods J, Howard S, Fletcher J, Dewhirst N, Williams C, Rushton A, Welters I, Leuwer M, Pearse R, Ackland G, Khan A, Niebrzegowska E, Benton S, Wragg A, Archbold A, Smith A, McAlees E, Ramballi C, Macdonald N, Januszewska M, Stephens R, Reyes A, Paredes LG, Sultan P, Cain D, Whittle J, Del Arroyo AG, Sessler DI, Kurz A, Sun Z, Finnegan PS, Egan C, Honar H, Shahinyan A, Panjasawatwong K, Fu AY, Wang S, Reineks E, Nagele P, Blood J, Kalin M, Gibson D, Wildes T; Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN (VISION) Writing Group, on behalf of The Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN (VISION) Investigators; Appendix 1. The Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN (VISION) Study Investigators Writing Group; Appendix 2. The Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN Operations Committee; Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN VISION Study Investigators. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2014 Mar;120(3):564-78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000113.
PMID: 24534856BACKGROUNDWijnberge M, Schenk J, Bulle E, Vlaar AP, Maheshwari K, Hollmann MW, Binnekade JM, Geerts BF, Veelo DP. Association of intraoperative hypotension with postoperative morbidity and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1):zraa018. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa018.
PMID: 33609377BACKGROUNDRoach JK, Thiele RH. Perioperative blood pressure monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jun;33(2):127-138. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 7.
PMID: 31582093BACKGROUNDRomagnoli S, Ricci Z, Quattrone D, Tofani L, Tujjar O, Villa G, Romano SM, De Gaudio AR. Accuracy of invasive arterial pressure monitoring in cardiovascular patients: an observational study. Crit Care. 2014 Nov 30;18(6):644. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0644-4.
PMID: 25433536BACKGROUNDTruijen J, van Lieshout JJ, Wesselink WA, Westerhof BE. Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Aug;26(4):267-78. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9375-8. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
PMID: 22695821BACKGROUNDNaylor AJ, Sessler DI, Maheshwari K, Khanna AK, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Suleiman I, Reville EM, Cote D, Hutcherson MT, Nguyen BM, Elsharkawy H, Kurz A. Arterial Catheters for Early Detection and Treatment of Hypotension During Major Noncardiac Surgery: A Randomized Trial. Anesth Analg. 2020 Nov;131(5):1540-1550. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004370.
PMID: 33079877BACKGROUNDWax DB, Lin HM, Leibowitz AB. Invasive and concomitant noninvasive intraoperative blood pressure monitoring: observed differences in measurements and associated therapeutic interventions. Anesthesiology. 2011 Nov;115(5):973-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182330286.
PMID: 21952254BACKGROUNDMeidert AS, Dolch ME, Muhlbauer K, Zwissler B, Klein M, Briegel J, Czerner S. Oscillometric versus invasive blood pressure measurement in patients with shock: a prospective observational study in the emergency department. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Apr;35(2):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00482-2. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
PMID: 32056094BACKGROUNDRutten AJ, Ilsley AH, Skowronski GA, Runciman WB. A comparative study of the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure using automatic oscillometers, arterial cannulation and auscultation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1986 Feb;14(1):58-65. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8601400113.
PMID: 3954015BACKGROUNDGabriel A, Lindblad LE, Angleryd C. Non-invasive vs. invasive beat-to-beat monitoring of blood pressure. Clin Physiol. 1992 Mar;12(2):229-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1992.tb00309.x.
PMID: 1582140BACKGROUNDFrancke A, Wachsmuth H. [How accurate is invasive blood pressure determination with fluid-filled pressure line systems?]. Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2000;25(2):46-54. German.
PMID: 10816897BACKGROUNDMireles SA, Jaffe RA, Drover DR, Brock-Utne JG. A poor correlation exists between oscillometric and radial arterial blood pressure as measured by the Philips MP90 monitor. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009 Jun;23(3):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s10877-009-9178-8. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
PMID: 19396553BACKGROUNDRibezzo S, Spina E, Di Bartolomeo S, Sanson G. Noninvasive techniques for blood pressure measurement are not a reliable alternative to direct measurement: a randomized crossover trial in ICU. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 30;2014:353628. doi: 10.1155/2014/353628. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24616624BACKGROUNDVelasco A, Ono C, Nugent K, Tarwater P, Kumar A. Ultrasonic evaluation of the radial artery diameter in a local population from Texas. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Jul;24(7):339-41.
PMID: 22781473BACKGROUNDPancholy SB, Shah S, Patel TM. Radial Artery Access, Hemostasis, and Radial Artery Occlusion. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2015 Apr;4(2):121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PMID: 28582044BACKGROUND
Related Links
- Guidelines to Anesthesia \| Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.
- Coronary Interventions Handbook ; An Interventional Council Review
- Bickley, Lynn S. Bates' Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams \& Wilkins, 2020.
- 26\. Schroeder, Becky, et al. "Chapter 36 - Cardiovascular Monitoring." Miller's Anesthesia, Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , 2020, pp. 1145-1193. From Gropper, Michael A., and Ronald D. Miller. Miller's Anesthesia. Elsevier, 2020.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pascal Laferrière-Langlois
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, MSc, FRQS, Assistant Professor, Principal Investigator, Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2024
First Posted
July 25, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share