NCT06517589

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to test the relative efficacy of Process-based Therapy compared to traditional CBT delivered in routine practice (r-CBT) for difficult-to-treat anxiety disorders and depression.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 29, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 11, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

July 11, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)

    Emotional distress, minimum value=0, maximum value=63, higher scores mean worse outcome

    Assessed at inclusion, at pre-treatment, at post-treatment (week 32) and at 6 month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Euroqol-5D (EQ-5D)

    Assessed at inclusion, at pre-treatment, at post-treatment (week 32) and at 6 month follow-up

  • Positive-Mental Health Scale (PMH)

    Assessed at inclusion, at pre-treatment, at post-treatment (week 32) and at 6 month follow-up

  • Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS)

    Assessed at inclusion, at pre-treatment, at post-treatment (week 32) and at 6 month follow-up

  • Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-10)

    Assessed at inclusion, at pre-treatment, at post-treatment (week 32) and at 6 month follow-up

  • Acceptance and Action Questionnaire Version 2 (AAQ-2)

    Assessed at inclusion, at pre-treatment, at post-treatment (week 32) and at 6 month follow-up

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Process-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

In PBT (20 sessions), treatment is initiated by a collaborative interpretation of the dynamic network model using smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment collected during the baseline. Based on the outcome of the dynamic network model, interventions are selected on the basis of empirical evidence for mechanisms of change matching to the central node of the individual patient, besides feedback loops and self-loops, as the key process maintaining the maladaptive pattern. Interventions are conceptualized in the evolutionary framework as variation, selection and retention of an adaptive mode of the central node related to the specific context of the problem. The change of this variable is monitored using daily judgements on the basis of EMA. Further treatment planning focuses on additional targets to establish the adaptive modes of the dimensions as defined in the positive network model. Concomitant medication is allowed and will be controlled in statistical analyses.

Other: Process-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (PBT)

Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In r-CBT (20 sessions) a naturalistic setting is retained for treatment decisions. Treatment planning follows traditional theories about the effects of the interventions on factors maintaining the disorder, e.g. avoidance and exposure in anxiety disorder or reduced reinforcement of activities and behavioral activation in depression. Interventions are selected on the basis of common treatment manuals related to diagnoses, e.g. CBT for depression. Individual data from the behavioral analysis are used to taylor the techniques to the problem behaviors or dysfunctional thoughts of patients. Treatment process focuses mainly on the implementation of the manualized interventions adapted to the individual patient as recommended in the National guidelines for treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. Concomitant medication is allowed and will be controlled in statistical analyses.

Other: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

Interventions

PBT (20 sessions), intervention planning based on the use of EMA data, feedback of dynamic network analysis and matching of interventions to central nodes of the network.

Process-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

CBT (20 sessions), intervention planning as usual based on manual.

Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A primary DSM-5 diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorder
  • At least two unsuccessful attempts of pharmacological or psychological treatment according to the German guidelines for the treatment of depression or anxiety disorders (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF)
  • Age 18-65 years
  • Sufficient knowledge of the German language
  • Participating patients are not required to discontinue medication, but to keep medication constant over the treatment period

You may not qualify if:

  • Increased suicidality
  • Substance abuse or dependency
  • Borderline personality disorder
  • Pervasive developmental disorder
  • Psychotic disorder
  • Eating disorder
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Severe physical illness

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

JWGUniversity

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60486, Germany

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Stangier U, Kohl V, Gorg N, Sendig L, Hufschmidt B, Bonarius D, Nemani A, Ebert M, Hofmann SG. Process-based therapy vs. routine-CBT for difficult-to-treat mood and anxiety disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08689-3.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionAnxiety Disorders

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of the Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy and Center for Psychotherapy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2024

First Posted

July 24, 2024

Study Start

January 29, 2024

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

July 30, 2025

Last Updated

July 30, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the main publication of outcomes, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared. Further Study Protocol, Analysis Plan, Informed Consent Form and Analytic Code will be shared to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication. Data are available for 5 years at a third party website (Link to be included).
Access Criteria
Proposals should be directed to stangier@psych.uni-frankfurt.de. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Locations