Psychophysiological Effects of Music
1 other identifier
interventional
149
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study employed a repeated measure between-subjects design. Two groups (i.e., depressed group and non-depressed group) of participants were recruited. Each participant experienced four stages: baseline, neutral control, sadness induction, and music intervention. The outcome variables were self-reported emotion and Heart Rate Variability features. Emotions were reported at the end of every stage. Electrocardiogram signals were recorded throughout the experiment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2024
CompletedJuly 24, 2024
July 1, 2024
2 months
July 1, 2024
July 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM)
The SAM scale is a brief and widely used tool for assessing emotional states. The scale is a nonverbal self-report measure of emotion, using a set of cartoon-like manikins. The manikins illustrate nine intensity levels for valence (1 = unpleasant; 9 = pleasant), arousal (1 = calm, 9 = excited), and dominance (1 = controlled; 9 = controlling).
Immediately after the baseline, immediately after the neutral control, immediately after the sadness induction, and immediately after the music intervention.
Revision of Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-R)
The PANAS is another widely used scale to measure mood or emotion. The Chinese version of PANAS is comprised of 18 items, with 9 items measuring positive affect (e.g., joyful, inspired) and 9 items measuring negative affect (e.g., sad, fearful). Because participants were required to report their feelings repeatedly in this study, 18 items would be too long and tiresome. The 18 items plus "calmness" were used as 19 options for participants to choose. They needed to select one of the emotion words to tag their strongest emotion for the stage that they had just experienced. This revision of PANAS allowed us to capture the specific emotion type.
Immediately after the baseline, immediately after the neutral control, immediately after the sadness induction, and immediately after the music intervention.
Mean of Normal-to-Normal Intervals (MeanNN)
MeanNN refers to the average duration between consecutive normal heartbeats, also named inter-beat interval. A higher MeanNN indicates a lower heart rate.
Throughout the whole experiment, an average of 6 minutes for each stage.
Standard Deviation of Normal-to-Normal Intervals (SDNN)
SDNN measures the overall variability of heart rate. Higher SDNN values indicate greater variability.
Throughout the whole experiment, an average of 6 minutes for each stage.
Study Arms (2)
Depressed group
EXPERIMENTALThe participants were categorized into two groups using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). PHQ-9 is a self-report scale. PHQ-9 scores of 5 or higher represent mild and severe depression, while PHQ-9 scores of lower than 5 mean normal condition. HAM-D is a scale administered by a healthcare professional. The cut-off point of the HAM-D scale is 8, which divides normal conditions from depressive conditions. The participants first completed PHQ-9. For those with PHQ-9 scores of 5 or higher, the trained researchers interviewed them and rated their severity of depression on the HAM-D. The participants first completed PHQ-9. For those with PHQ-9 scores ≥ 5, the trained researchers interviewed them and rated their severity of depression on the HAM-D. Those with HAM-D scores \> 8 were classified into the depressed group.
Non-depressed group
EXPERIMENTALThose with PHQ-9 scores \< 5 or HAM-D scores ≤ 8 were classified into the non-depressed group.
Interventions
Participants went through four stages. In the rest stage, they were instructed to relax. In the neutral control stage, they watched an informative video about plastic injection molding. In the sadness induction stage, they viewed sad clips from either Hachi: A Dog's Tale or My Brother and Sister, with the order randomized across participants. In the music intervention stage, they listened to the cheerful Cuckoo Waltz. Each stage lasted for about 6 minutes. The interventions for the two groups were exactly same. PS: On the basis of the PHQ-9, this HAMD interview was conducted to further group the participants. So, following the experimental protocol, participants who scored ≥ 5 on the PHQ-9 measure underwent the HAMD interview, while the remaining individuals were simply interviewed about their feelings during the experiment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-30 years
- Right-handed
- No recent illness or medication use
- No history of neurological or psychiatric disorders
- Normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity (myopic participants wore glasses)
- Normal hearing
You may not qualify if:
- Incapable of giving written informed consent to this study
- Acute high suicide risk at baseline assessment
- Psychosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shulin Chen
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China
Related Publications (5)
Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.
PMID: 7962581BACKGROUNDWatson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
PMID: 3397865BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDHAMILTON M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. No abstract available.
PMID: 14399272BACKGROUNDWang X, Lu T, Zhou B, Chen W, Zheng J, Chen H, Chen S. Psychophysiological effects of music on sadness in participants with and without depressive symptoms. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Feb 26;25(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04824-y.
PMID: 40011873DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2024
First Posted
July 24, 2024
Study Start
April 18, 2023
Primary Completion
June 20, 2023
Study Completion
June 20, 2023
Last Updated
July 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share