Study Stopped
Early terminated due to protocol design issues with inability to correct at this stage.
PICO Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU) Reimbursement Study
A Pragmatic, Multi-centre, Prospective, Randomized, Superiority Study to Compare the Performance of the Single-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System PICO Versus Standard of Care in the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers
2 other identifiers
interventional
142
1 country
44
Brief Summary
This study intends to demonstrate the superiority of PICO treatment when applied up to 12 weeks, versus Standard of Care (SOC) in the treatment of hard to heal Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU) by community-based practitioners. The primary endpoint is the incidence of confirmed healed VLUs at 12 weeks or before, in the PICO treatment group versus the SOC group. The study hypothesis is based on the Kirsner study (Kirsner R, Dove C, Reyzelman A, Vayser D, Jaimes H. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system, compared to traditional negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic ulcers of the lower extremities. Wound Repair Regen. 2019 Sep;27(5):519-529)), which compared PICO treatment to traditional NPWT (t-NPWT); the ITT analysis in the subgroup of patients with VLU showed 45.1% wound closure (confirmed wound healing) at 12 weeks in the PICO group as compared to 28% in the t-NPWT group, yielding a difference of 17.1%, 95% Confidence Interval = (-1.9%;+35.4%). For our study, the Sponsor made the assumptions that the t-NPWT healing proportion (28%) can be used as conservative estimate for the control group proportion and that the PICO group should provide at least a 17% improvement over standard of care. Adaptative design is chosen to adjust the sample size using the re-assessment size method to preserve alpha risk (α) level.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
44 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 24, 2025
CompletedJanuary 8, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.8 years
July 15, 2024
January 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) confirmed healed by or at 12 weeks
The primary endpoint is the incidence of confirmed healed Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) at 12 weeks or before in PICO versus SOC group. A confirmed healed VLU is defined as a wound with complete closure (100% epithelialization) according to PI's judgement during two visits that are two weeks apart (±3 days) AND confirmed by a blind assessment board based on blinded photograph examination.
Up to 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Time to Achieve Wound Healing
Up to 12 Weeks
Relative Wound Area Reduction (RWAR)
Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (up to 14 weeks ±3days)
Time to achieve 100% healthy granulation tissue
Day 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (up to 14 weeks ±3 days)
Changes in quality of life using the generic EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L )
Day 0 to Week 12 (up to 14 weeks ±3 days)
Changes in quality of life using the disease specific VEINES-Qol (Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study on Quality of Life) questionnaire
Day 0 to Week 12 (up to 14 weeks ±3 days)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of VLU-Treatment in Community Setting
Day 0 to Week 12 (up to 14 weeks ±3 days)
Study Arms (2)
PICO Treatment Arm
EXPERIMENTALThe maximum duration for treatment with PICO will be 12 weeks. PICO treatment will be discontinued if the wound does not respond to treatment after 2 weeks according to predefined criteria, if the wound gets worse at any time, if the wound is 100% epithelialized, or if the wound presents advanced healing, which will be assessed using predefined criteria. In the latter case where the VLU is determined sufficiently healed according to the pre-specified criteria in the protocol, subjects will be switched to Standard of Care (SOC). Wound care treatment at home will be done by home care nurses. Compression therapy will be maintained throughout the entire patient's follow-up.
Standard of Care Treatment Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORWounds are treated with appropriate traditional dressings throughout the study based on wound condition and healing trajectory. Wound care treatment at home will be done by home care nurses. Compression therapy will be maintained throughout the entire patient's follow-up.
Interventions
Application of an appropriate wound primary dressing according to its intended purpose and chosen appropriately according to wound healing stage: 1. Dressing choice should take wound condition into consideration but may also consider subject's comfort (including pain) and HCP's preference. 2. Sequential treatment: * Debridement stage: alginate, hydrogel, absorbent, or hydro-detersive dressings * Granulation stage: wound contact layer, foam, petrolatum, or hydrofiber dressings * Epithelialization stage: wound contact layer, hydrocolloids * Other: dressings for specific clinical situations (e.g. fragile skin, infection; hemorrhagic wound, malodorous wound) 3. Application of appropriate venous compression therapy based on Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) value.
PICO 7 is a single-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System consisting of a small portable pump, 2 AA batteries, 1 or 2 dressings, and fixation strips. The dressing is changed when the dressing is saturated or after 7 days of treatment. PICO Treatment will be given in addition to compression therapy. If the wound is healed and until the wound healing confirmation visit, Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) allocated to the PICO group may be covered using a protective dressing. If the wound meets the wound improvement criteria as assessed by the PI during the monthly visits, PICO treatment may be stopped.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject signed informed consent
- Both gender adult ≥ 18 years old
- Venous leg ulcer (VLU) diagnosed by:
- ABPI ≥ 0.7 and \< 1.3 within the last 3 months
- If ABPI \< 1.3, one of the following measures should be available:
- Toe Brachial Pressure Index (TBPI) \> 0.7
- Toe pressure (TP) \> 50 mmHg
- Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) \> 30 mmHg
- VLU duration ≥ 6 weeks
- VLU surface area:
- Isolated leg ulcer: ≤ 100 cm\^2
- Non-isolated leg ulcers: pooled surface area ≤ 100 cm\^2 that can be covered by a single dressing
- Exuding VLU according to clinical judgement
- The subject is in acceptable state of health and nutrition according to clinical judgement
- The subject is able to follow the protocol instruction and willing to comply with compression therapy
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical evidence of VLU infection \[i.e. presence of at least 3 overt signs of local infection (e.g., erythema, warmth, swelling, pain, odor) or signs of spreading or systemic infection)
- Wound with necrotic tissue after debridement
- Sloughy wound (100% of slough) after debridement
- Exposed arteries, veins, nerves or organs
- Current therapy with chronic oral corticosteroids (\>10 days)
- Previous therapy with negative pressure wound therapy device or hyperbaric oxygen within 7 days prior to enrolment
- Arterial insufficiency non-revascularized
- Wound actively bleeding
- Malignant wound
- Person belonging to a population referred to in articles 64 (incapacitated subjects), 65 (minors), 66 (pregnant or breastfeeding women), 67 (persons performing mandatory military service, persons deprived of liberty, persons who, due to a judicial decision cannot take part in clinical investigations) and 68 (patients in emergency situation) of the Medical Device Regulation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.lead
- T.J. Smith and Nephew, Limitedcollaborator
- CEN Biotechcollaborator
Study Sites (44)
Clinique de L'Atlantique
Puilboreau, France, France
Cabinet Médical
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, France
Synartis
Aire-sur-la-Lys, France
Polyclinique de Picardie
Amiens, France
Cabinet Privé
Antibes, France
Clinique d'Argonay
Argonay, France
Cabinet de Médecine Vasculaire - Angiologie
Arignac, France
Clinique Rhône Durance
Avignon, France
Cabinet Médical
Béziers, France
Cabinet de Médecine Vasculaire
Bourg-en-Bresse, France
Cabinet Médical
Cahors, France
GCS Pôle Santé de Cahors
Cahors, France
Cicadom
Challes-les-Eaux, France
Sui'vui Santé
Château-Renault, France
Cabinet Médical Gambetta Paymal (CMPG)
Clichy, France
CICA+
Dardilly, France
Maison de Santé d'Etauliers
Étauliers, France
Cicadom
Guilherand-Granges, France
Cabinet Privé
Idron, France
Clinique St. Charles
La Roche-sur-Yon, France
Cabinet Médical
Langon, France
Cicadom
Le Coteau, France
Clinique des Augustines
Malestroit, France
Pôle Santé
Montélimar, France
Cabinet Médical
Paris, France
One Clinic
Plaisir, France
Cabinet d'angiologie de Pont-l'Abbé
Pont-l'Abbé, France
Cabinet privé
Pontcharra, France
Cabinet Privé
Rambouillet, France
Centre de Médecine Vasculaire
Rodez, France
Cabinet Médical
Saint-Alban, France
Clinique Megival
Saint-Aubin-sur-Scie, France
Clinique Mégival
Saint-Aubin-sur-Scie, France
Cabinet Privé
Saint-Gély-du-Fesc, France
Cicadom
Saint-Nazaire, France
Cabinet d'Angiologie et de Médecine Vasculaire
Saint-Priest, France
Polyclinique de Picardie
Sainte-Maxime, France
Cabinet Privé
Sarreguemines, France
Centre Privé de Consultations Médico-Chirurgicales
Saumur, France
Cabinet Privé Soyaux
Soyaux, France
Cabinet Médical
Thionville, France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, France
Centre Léon Blum
Villeurbanne, France
Cabinet Médical
Wattignies, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fleur Derdeyn
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The primary endpoint (i.e., 100% epithelialization) includes a blind assessment to reduce bias. The Blind Assessment Board will assess the primary endpoint using subject-series of wound photos, being unaware of treatment allocation of subjects.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2024
First Posted
July 19, 2024
Study Start
December 29, 2023
Primary Completion
October 24, 2025
Study Completion
October 24, 2025
Last Updated
January 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share