Need to be Needed (N2BN) Intervention
N2BN RCT
Randomized, Controlled Trial of Need to be Needed (N2BN) Intervention to Improve Social Connection, Reduce Social Isolation and Loneliness
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed study is a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) that will examine the effectiveness of an intervention designed to reduce social isolation and loneliness of adults with serious mental illness (SMI). The intervention will focus on improving their sense of mattering by using acts of kindness and experiencing gratitude through volunteering. 120 participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group or the attention control group. Over the course of the 6-month intervention, participants in the intervention arm, will receive weekly support from the interventionist. The interventionist and the participant will collaboratively set goals and develop an initial intervention plan, which is informed by the participants interests, values and goals. The attention control group will receive non-directive listening support through research assistants. Data collection for all participants will occur at baseline, at the mid-point of the intervention at 3 months, and at the end of the 6-month intervention. Participants will be asked questions about quality of experience, social context and satisfaction, mattering components, kindness, gratitude, and loneliness. We will gather data on demographic background, life transitions, social network characteristics, internalized stigma, neighborhood climate, depression, and trait measures of mattering and loneliness during intake and exit interviews. Additionally, participants of the intervention arm will be asked to provide feedback about the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 7, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2035
January 21, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.8 years
July 14, 2024
January 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Change of Demographic Background
Standard personal characteristics will be assessed via intake interview. Demographic items will include 11 items identifying employment, income, marital status
baseline, after 3-months, after 6-months
Change of Neighborhood Social Climate Scale from Housing Environment Survey
Neighborhood Social Climate Scale from Housing Environment Survey (HES) (Kloos \& Shah, 2009): This 12-item subscale from the HES includes questions related to housing type (independent, familial, group), social context (alone, partnered, with others), stability (the length lived at their current residence), and satisfaction with one's housing and neighborhood
baseline, after 3-months, after 6-months
Change of Social Network
Social Network Generator (Pescosolido \& Wright, 2004): This instrument identifies important people connected with the respondent. Network size, composition, contact, closeness, reciprocity, changes will be quantified.
baseline, after 3-months, after 6-months
Change of sense of mattering
Interpersonal Mattering Scale (Moschella \& Baynard, 2021; Elliott et al., 2004): This 12-item scale examines three dimensions of mattering, including awareness (a=.87), importance (a=.89), and reliance (a=86).
baseline, after 3-months, after 6-months
Change of sense of loneliness
3-Item UCLA Loneliness Scale (Hughes, Waite, Hawkley, \& Cacioppo, 2004). This brief measure of loneliness has shown satisfactory reliability and validity in the measurement of overall loneliness. (this instrument is repeated from intake interview)
baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of sense of loneliness
6-item DeJong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (De Jong Gierveld \& van Tilburg, 2006) This 6-item measure is used to create a unidimensional overall loneliness measure as well as provide information about the emotional and/or social loneliness situation of respondents. Social loneliness reflects dissatisfaction with social relationships, whereas emotional loneliness represents dissatisfaction with a close discussion partner. (this instrument is repeated from intake interview)
baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of depressive symptoms
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977): This is a 20-item scale of depressive symptoms covering the prior week. a= .85-.90
baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of sense of emptiness
The Psychological Emptiness Scale (PES) Herron et al., (2024) This instrument is a 19-item scale to measure the subjective experience of the sense of emptiness over the past month.
baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of community participation
Temple University Community Participation Measure (TUCP). This measure records self-reports of community participation in 26 different areas including going to a supermarket, participating in a community social group (like a book club or recreational sports team), going to a movie, or working for pay. Participants are asked to indicate the number of days in the past 30 days that they participated in each of the 26 areas, whether each participation area was important to them, and whether they felt they participated in each area enough, not enough, or too much. Recent research has found the measure to be reliable and valid.
Baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of health outcome
PROMIS® Scale v1.2 - Global Health- Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health v1.2 short form is a 10-item instrument representing multiple domains. Scores are assigned for both Global Physical Health component and Global Mental Health component.
Baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of perceived stigma
Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness scale (ISMI-10) (Hammer \& Toland, 2017): Internalized stigma will be assessed via this 10-item measure that has demonstrated adequate internal consistency, reliability and external validity. The ISMI-10 was found to have a good internal consistency reliability of 0.75.
Baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of perceived acts of kindess
Kindness Measure (Young, et al., 2021): Created as a 20-item measure to assess the amount and variety of kindness a person exhibits. Contains subscales of a) affective-socially prescribed, b) anthropophobia, c) affective-proactive, d) principle-socially prescribed, and e) principle-proactive (subscale internal consistency .68-.95).
Baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of perceived gratitude
Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6) (McCullough et al., 2002)- The Gratitude Questionnaire-Six-Item Form (GQ-6) is a six-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess individual differences in dispositional gratitude in daily life. Respondents endorse each item on a 7-point Likert-type scale (where 1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree), with two items negatively worded. It demonstrates good internal reliability with alphas between .82 and .87.
Baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of overall well being
Overall Well Being PERMA Profile (Butler \& Kern, 2016) This instrument is a brief 23-item measure of overall well-being and examines positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning and accomplishment, as well as negative emotion and perceived health. The instrument has demonstrated good psychometric properties in large-scale studies with adults. This measure will support identification of important relationships; however, additional domains can be examined in relation to engagement and purpose in life.
Baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of recovery assessment
Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-20): assesses self-determination and hope as it relates to recovery. It is frequently used as an outcome measure for program evaluations. It is a 20-item self-report measure. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale and range from strongly agree to strongly disagree
Baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Change of social support
The MOS Social Support survey: a 19-item measure with 4 support scales (Emotional/Informational, Tangible, Affectionate, and Positive Social Interaction) and an overall functional social support index that has been shown to have good reliability and validity.
Baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Need to be Needed Intervention
EXPERIMENTALInterventionists will meet with participants to discuss supported volunteering concepts and develop an initial plan. This plan will be flexible as it is likely that participants will need multiple opportunities to identify and explore options for voluntarism. Once the plan is developed, interventionist will make weekly contact to support participants in achieving goals. These weekly contacts (3x per month) are expected to be brief (30-40 minutes) and focused on information sharing and supported problem solving. Interventionists will also schedule monthly plan reviews (1x per month) with participants to review and revise supported volunteering individualized plans. Both clients who are achieving goals as well as those falling short of their goals may want to revise or change their plan.
Active control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants assigned to the attention control condition will receive printed information on the importance and opportunities for volunteering and will be encouraged to review resources from the TU Collaborative website. They will receive weekly 10-minute non-directive supportive listening sessions via telephone/videoconferencing with a Research assistant. Research assistants are full-time staff members with an undergraduate degree in psychology. Undergraduate students are not involved in performing the weekly check-ins with the control group. The control group will not receive weekly 1:1 support through a trained clinician.
Interventions
Interventionist-supported volunteering intervention that targets opportunities creating social connections that matter through focus on kindness and gratitude throughout the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A research diagnosis of Major Depression, Bipolar I, II, or Schizophrenia Spectrum disorder.
- Participants will be screened by research staff using sections of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI; Sheehan et al., 1998) that will identify research diagnoses of: Major Depression, Bipolar I, II, or Schizophrenia Spectrum disorder.
- Ages 18 years old and older
- Living in the community
- Able to communicate in written and oral English
- UCLA-Loneliness Scale score of 6 or higher
You may not qualify if:
- Having a legal guardian
- Unable to give informed consent.
- Living situation which restricts their ability to move freely
- Potential participants failing to meet screening criteria will be informed at the time that we are not able to enroll them in the study at this time. Any interview notes, or information recorded on the MINI will be destroyed or securely deleted.
- The study will not enroll any vulnerable populations.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hall Mercer
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
Related Publications (6)
Hare-Duke L, Dening T, Oliveira D, Dewa R, Slade M. Social connectedness in adults with mental disorders: ecological validation of a conceptual framework for novel complex interventions. J Ment Health. 2021 Jun;30(3):333-340. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1875409. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
PMID: 33522341BACKGROUNDPrilleltensky I. Mattering at the Intersection of Psychology, Philosophy, and Politics. Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Mar;65(1-2):16-34. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12368. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
PMID: 31407358BACKGROUNDSnethen G, McCormick BP, Van Puymbroeck M. Community involvement, planning and coping skills: pilot outcomes of a recreational-therapy intervention for adults with schizophrenia. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(18):1575-84. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.650315. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
PMID: 22303816BACKGROUNDKim J, Morgul K. Long-term consequences of youth volunteering: Voluntary versus involuntary service. Soc Sci Res. 2017 Sep;67:160-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 13.
PMID: 28888284BACKGROUNDWong YJ, Owen J, Gabana NT, Brown JW, McInnis S, Toth P, Gilman L. Does gratitude writing improve the mental health of psychotherapy clients? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Res. 2018 Mar;28(2):192-202. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1169332. Epub 2016 May 3.
PMID: 27139595BACKGROUNDO'Connell BH, O'Shea D, Gallagher S. Feeling Thanks and Saying Thanks: A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining If and How Socially Oriented Gratitude Journals Work. J Clin Psychol. 2017 Oct;73(10):1280-1300. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22469. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
PMID: 28263399BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Investigator and research assistant completing baseline, mid-point and end-point interview are blind to treatment allocation. Data analyst will be blind to participant condition.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2024
First Posted
July 19, 2024
Study Start
October 7, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2035
Last Updated
January 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
All participants in the study will be required to complete informed consent forms which will include a clause about data preservation and sharing. Subjects will be assured that their identity will be protected and that no personally identifiable information (PII) will be disclosed as part of any data sharing. All data will be stored on Temple University's password protected, HIPAA-approved secure data server. However, because not all investigators who will need access to the data are at Temple, deidentified, anonymized data may be shared with other investigators via a secure file transfer system. All data in the study transferred between Temple University and collaborating institutions will be transferred through TUSafeSend using data encryption by way of a secure socket transfer protocol. TUSafeSend provides a secure method for transferring files containing confidential or other sensitive information, including HIPAA authorized data with PHI or PII.