Effectiveness of Different Types of Toothbrushes on Periodontal Health in Orthodontic Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of different toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances who have gingival inflammation. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Is a single-tufted toothbrush as effective as orthodontic or conventional toothbrushes?
- 2.What are the effects of these toothbrushes on dental biofilm removal and gingival inflammation? Researchers will compare conventional toothbrushes, orthodontic toothbrushes, and single-tufted toothbrushes after professional mechanical debridement and oral hygiene instruction.
- 3.Receive nonsurgical periodontal therapy
- 4.According to the group they are involved, they will receive an oral hygiene kit (toothbrush and toothpaste) and instruction
- 5.They will participate in the recalls in the first week, sixth week, and third month.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2024
CompletedJuly 19, 2024
July 1, 2024
9 months
July 8, 2024
July 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Gingival inflammation
Löe \& Silnesss Gingival index
at the baseline, first week, sixth week and third month
bleeding on probing
bleeding on probing
at the baseline, first week, sixth week and third month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Dental biofilm
at the baseline, first week, sixth week and third month
Other Outcomes (1)
Pocket depth
at the baseline, first week, sixth week and third month
Study Arms (3)
Conventional toothbrush group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are instructed with the modified Bass technique. In this technique, the toothbrush bristles are positioned 45° to the long axis of the tooth towards the base of the tooth at the gum line with a gentle back-and-forth rolling motion, then swept towards the occlusal surface of the teeth. To adapt to orthodontic braces, the same movement is repeated with the bristles positioned just occlusal to the brackets.
Orthodontic toothbrush group
EXPERIMENTALThe patients in this group are instructed to brush with the Bass technique. In this technique, the toothbrush is placed on the gingival margin with its bristles at 45° to the long axis of the tooth. It is demonstrated by making back-and-forth movements and vibrating the brush at short intervals without lifting the bristles.
Single-tufted toothbrush group
EXPERIMENTALIn this group, a single-tooth circular brushing technique first developed by Jiri Sedelmayer was explained, and dental plaque removal is demonstrated with circular movements around the brackets and following the gingival margin of each tooth.
Interventions
Patients brush their teeth using the technique instructed to them using the toothbrush provided.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients who had at least 22 teeth with brackets (excluding third molars)
- had a diagnosis of dental plaque biofilm-induced gingivitis defined as ≥10% of --sites with bleeding on probing (BoP) and mean probing depth (PD) ≤3 mm
- were systemically healthy, non-smokers, or smoked \<10 cigarettes per day for at least five years
- had not used antibiotics for the last three months
- were not pregnant.
You may not qualify if:
- patients who smoked ≥ 10 cigarettes per day for at least five years
- who had less than 26 teeth with brackets
- were younger than 18 years of age or older than 35 years of age
- were periodontally healthy or had periodontitis
- who had systemic disease
- had used antibiotics in the last three months were pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Okan Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Okan University Dental Hospital
Istanbul, Tuzla, 34947, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Lee DW, Moon IS. The plaque-removing efficacy of a single-tufted brush on the lingual and buccal surfaces of the molars. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011 Jun;41(3):131-4. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.3.131. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
PMID: 21811688RESULTRafe Z, Vardimon A, Ashkenazi M. Comparative study of 3 types of toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jul;130(1):92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.018.
PMID: 16849078RESULTElShehaby M, Mofti B, Montasser MA, Bearn D. Powered vs manual tooth brushing in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Nov;158(5):639-649. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
PMID: 32951930RESULTEricsson I, Thilander B, Lindhe J. Periodontal conditions after orthodontic tooth movements in the dog. Angle Orthod. 1978 Jul;48(3):210-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1978)0482.0.CO;2. No abstract available.
PMID: 280130RESULTAxelsson P, Nystrom B, Lindhe J. The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Sep;31(9):749-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00563.x.
PMID: 15312097RESULTDiamanti-Kipioti A, Gusberti FA, Lang NP. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances. J Clin Periodontol. 1987 Jul;14(6):326-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1987.tb00979.x.
PMID: 3509967RESULTZachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1972 Jan;42(1):26-34. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1972)0422.0.CO;2. No abstract available.
PMID: 4500561RESULTAykol-Sahin G, Ay-Kocabas B, Mert B, Usta H. Effectiveness of different types of toothbrushes on periodontal health in orthodontic patients with gingivitis: A randomized controlled study. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):1289. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05084-x.
PMID: 39455996DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The researcher performing the clinical examination will not know the group in which the patients are included.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2024
First Posted
July 19, 2024
Study Start
August 1, 2023
Primary Completion
April 30, 2024
Study Completion
April 30, 2024
Last Updated
July 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07