NCT06508879

Brief Summary

Wound healing disorders are a major problem in cardiac surgery. They prolong the inpatient stay and are associated with a high health and, above all, psychological burden for patients. They also represent a major organizational, medical and financial challenge for the treatment team. There is therefore still a great need for effective prevention of wound healing disorders. It goes without saying that wound management plays a major role in the development of wound healing disorders. Nowadays, there are a large number of products from various manufacturers and studies for efficient wound healing disorder prophylaxis. One point of criticism is that most of the existing studies are financed by the manufacturer. Due to the otherwise broad range of applications for all wounds in various specialist areas, it remains to be clarified whether such products can achieve a reduction in the rate of wound healing disorders, especially in cardiac surgery. After extensive literature research, we are of the opinion that the Aquacel Surgical Ag dressing, a new silver-coated hydrocolloid dressing, can be offered to cardiac surgery patients at our clinic as an effective prophylaxis against wound healing disorders.The study is a randomized prospective clinical trial. It is being conducted at the Clinic for Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery and has already been approved by the Rhineland-Palatinate Ethics Committee. The study should include 440 heart patients and last for 12 months. It will compare the Aquacel Surgical Ag bandage against our conventional methods. This study is being conducted independently of the industry. We want to prove that an intelligent investment in the prophylaxis of wound healing disorders is worthwhile for both patients and the clinic. If the outcome of the study is positive, this dressing will be be used regularly in our cardiac surgery clinic.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
352

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2019

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 12, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 18, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 18, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

July 12, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • SSI rate

    overall rate of incidence of any kind of SSI

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • dressing changes

    7 days

  • severity of SSI

    30 days

  • need for treatment

    30 days

Study Arms (2)

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

a standard wound dressing composed of sterile gauze and adhesive tape was applied under sterile conditions. In the absence of bleeding, excessive wound secretion, or detachment, the dressing was left on the wound until the second postoperative day (POD 2), otherwise, it was changed immediately. Starting at POD 2, the dressing was changed daily under aseptic conditions until the wound remained dry (between POD 3-5). In the absence of bleeding, excessive wound secretion, or detachment, the wound was then left uncovered. This practice corresponded to the standard treatment of cardiothoracic patients in our department at the time of initiating this study.

Other: Standard Care (sterile gauze and adhesive tape)

Test Group

EXPERIMENTAL

directly after closing the wound, an occlusive hydrocolloid silver-containing wound dressing (Aquacel Ag Surgical®, ConvaTec, Oklahoma City, OK, USA) was applied under sterile conditions and, in the absence of bleeding; excessive wound secretion, or detachment, was maintained on the wound until POD 5, at which time the dressing was removed. In case of bleeding, excessive wound secretion, or detachment, the dressing was removed, the wound was cleaned, and a new sterile hydrocolloid wound dressing applied under aseptic conditions.

Combination Product: Aquacel Ag Surgical®

Interventions

Aquacel Ag Surgical®COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Presurgical preparation was identical in both groups and no further intervention in patient treatment was made. See descpription of arms.

Test Group

Presurgical preparation was identical in both groups and no further intervention in patient treatment was made. See descpription of arms.

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Coronary artery bypass surgery
  • Elective and primary surgery (no reoperations)
  • Complete median sternotomy
  • Age under 90 years
  • Weight in the range of 50-140kg
  • No known allergy to silver or other wound dressings
  • No immunosuppressive therapy or hormonal substitution therapy, except for thyroid hormone
  • Capacity to consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Failure of medical personnel to adhere to study protocol, e.g., not applying the right wound dressing according to study protocol
  • Patients own decision
  • Lack of harvesting of at least one internal thoracic artery
  • Peri- and post-operative ventilation for \>48h
  • Re-thoracotomy for reasons other than SSI, e.g., bleeding
  • Mortality within the first 30 days

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Surgical Wound Infection

Interventions

Standard of Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wound InfectionInfectionsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
The patients were blinded until the time of the intervention (application of the bandage after surgery). Due to the nature of this study, it was not possible to conceal the treatment after the procedure, as patients could see their bandages and find out their allocation. Using methods to conceal the dressings (covering with neutral dressing) would have changed the nature of the dressings and affected the treatment. The study team could also see the bandages and was therefore not blinded.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study was designed as a single-center randomized controlled trial. Primary endpoint was overall rate of incidence of any kind of SSI. Secondary endpoints were number of dressing changes, severity of SSI and need for treatment. Wounds were monitored daily until the 7th and on the 30th postoperative day.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Cardiac surgery specialist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2024

First Posted

July 18, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion

August 31, 2019

Study Completion

August 31, 2019

Last Updated

July 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations