Cataract Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) Feasibility Pilot Study
CaTNAPS-1
Comparing Two Normal Approaches to Procedural Sedation for Cataract Surgery: A Prospective, Feasibility Pilot Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot clinical trial comparing two different sedation approaches for cataract surgery is to assess the feasibility, completeness, and distribution of data in measuring patient satisfaction, the quality of recovery, and surgical outcomes for the purpose of planning a larger clinical trial. Participants will be asked to respond to several surveys throughout the study on their experience and to assess outcomes of interest.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 6, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 9, 2026
CompletedJuly 9, 2026
June 1, 2026
11 months
June 25, 2024
April 14, 2026
June 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With High Satisfaction (ISAS Score ≥ 2)
The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) is an 11-item validated questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with anesthesia care. Each item is scored from -3 to +3, and the total score is calculated as the mean of all items, resulting in a total score range of -3 to +3. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. For this analysis, high satisfaction is defined as an ISAS score ≥ 2.
30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of Participants Meeting Eligibility Criteria at Screening
At screening (prior to enrollment)
Number of Participants Completing All Study Surveys at Each Timepoint
30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
Number of Participants Who Completed All Required Study Procedures
From enrollment through final study follow-up (POD7)
Number of Participants With Sedation-Related Complications During 30-Day Postoperative Follow-up
From enrollment through 30 days after surgery
Number of Participants Achieving Recovery on the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS)
30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALOral sedation will be administered to patients prior to the procedure.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORAn oral placebo pill will be administered to patients prior to the procedure.
Interventions
Oral medication for anxiolysis administered in the preoperative setting
A placebo pill with no active ingredients administered in the preoperative setting
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 60 years old
- Capable of providing informed consent and completing the study procedures in English
- Able to provide consent for oneself
- Able to follow directions
- Able to climb one flight of stairs without stopping to rest
- Have a new diagnosis of cataract disease
- Plan on having cataract surgery on their eye within the next 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- History of prior cataract surgery
- Admission to the hospital within the past 30 days
- Difficulty being sedated during other minor outpatient procedures or imaging studies
- Allergy or resistance to local anesthetic agents
- Cannot lay flat on your back without having symptoms (i.e., difficulty breathing, severe back pain, etc.)
- History of severe anxiety requiring routine use of benzodiazepines
- Severe valve disease (e.g., critical aortic stenosis)
- Cardiac conditions requiring an implanted cardiac device such as a pacemaker, defibrillator, or left ventricular assist device (for arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, etc.)
- Untreated chest pain or angina
- Patients with movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's Disease)
- History of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), or seizures
- Require home oxygen (O2) at rest or with exertion
- End-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis
- Morbid obesity (BMI\>35)
- Patient undergoing cataract surgery in combination with any other ophthalmologic procedure
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- University of California, San Franciscolead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Related Publications (51)
Chen CL, Lin GA, Bardach NS, Clay TH, Boscardin WJ, Gelb AW, Maze M, Gropper MA, Dudley RA. Preoperative medical testing in Medicare patients undergoing cataract surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 16;372(16):1530-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410846.
PMID: 25875258BACKGROUNDChen CL, Clay TH, McLeod S, Chang HP, Gelb AW, Dudley RA. A Revised Estimate of Costs Associated With Routine Preoperative Testing in Medicare Cataract Patients With a Procedure-Specific Indicator. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):231-238. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6372.
PMID: 29346472BACKGROUNDLiu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS. Cataracts. Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):600-612. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30544-5. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
PMID: 28242111BACKGROUNDNorregaard, J. C. Results from the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 85, 5-32, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00937.x (2007).
BACKGROUNDKent, C. Cataract Surgery: Is an anesthesiologist necessary?, <https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/cataract-surgery-is-an-anesthesiologist-necessary> (2009).
BACKGROUNDAndrews, M. Anthem Calls On Eye Surgeons To Monitor Anesthesia During Cataract Surgery, <https://khn.org/news/anthem-calls-on-eye-surgeons-to-monitor-anesthesia-during-cataract-surgery/> (2018).
BACKGROUNDIanchulev T, Litoff D, Ellinger D, Stiverson K, Packer M. Office-Based Cataract Surgery: Population Health Outcomes Study of More than 21 000 Cases in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
PMID: 26804760BACKGROUNDZakrzewski PA, Friel T, Fox G, Braga-Mele R. Monitored anesthesia care provided by registered respiratory care practitioners during cataract surgery: a report of 1957 cases. Ophthalmology. 2005 Feb;112(2):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.08.016.
PMID: 15691563BACKGROUNDKent-Smith BT, Wallace GM. Routine cataract surgery without the presence of an anaesthetist. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;35(6):589. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01553.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 17760646BACKGROUNDMurray P, Adams K, Haddad P, Murray N, O'Rourke M. The routine requirement for anaesthetists in local anaesthetic cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;35(2):195-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01441.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 17362468BACKGROUNDZakrzewski PA, Banashkevich AV, Friel T, Braga-Mele R. Monitored anesthesia care by registered respiratory therapists during cataract surgery: an update. Ophthalmology. 2010 May;117(5):897-902. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.005. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
PMID: 20079927BACKGROUNDBasta B, Gioia L, Gemma M, Dedola E, Bianchi I, Fasce F, Beretta L. Systemic adverse events during 2005 phacoemulsifications under monitored anesthesia care: a prospective evaluation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Sep;77(9):877-83.
PMID: 21878869BACKGROUNDKoolwijk J, Fick M, Selles C, Turgut G, Noordergraaf JI, Tukkers FS, Noordergraaf GJ. Outpatient cataract surgery: incident and procedural risk analysis do not support current clinical ophthalmology guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
PMID: 25444350BACKGROUNDKatz J, Feldman MA, Bass EB, Lubomski LH, Tielsch JM, Petty BG, Fleisher LA, Schein OD. Injectable versus topical anesthesia for cataract surgery: patient perceptions of pain and side effects. The Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery study team. Ophthalmology. 2000 Nov;107(11):2054-60. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00359-6.
PMID: 11054331BACKGROUNDKatz J, Feldman MA, Bass EB, Lubomski LH, Tielsch JM, Petty BG, Fleisher LA, Schein OD; Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery Study Team. Adverse intraoperative medical events and their association with anesthesia management strategies in cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001 Oct;108(10):1721-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00704-7.
PMID: 11581040BACKGROUNDFukuoka H, Afshari NA. The impact of age-related cataract on measures of frailty in an aging global population. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;28(1):93-97. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000338.
PMID: 27820747BACKGROUNDAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Calls on Anthem to Rescind Its New Policy on Anesthesia for Cataract Surgery, <https://www.asahq.org/advocacy-and-asapac/fda-and-washington-alerts/washington-alerts/2018/02/asa-calls-on-anthem-to-rescind-its-new-policy-on-anesthesia-for-cataract-surgery?&ct=fd2b35b6cdb74e0b126f4539b73b56360091233e85002bc197d8049fa56b7a4253b022b37557ad25186cfc15475fa96cd09811e97c66fe62b04a1ec1298f82ef> (2018).
BACKGROUNDAmerican Academy of Ophthalmology. Pressure on Anthem Grows; Academy Keeps Pushing for Cataract-Surgery Anesthesia Coverage, 2018).
BACKGROUNDPartridge JS, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing. 2012 Mar;41(2):142-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr182.
PMID: 22345294BACKGROUNDHubbard RE, Story DA. Patient frailty: the elephant in the operating room. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan;69 Suppl 1:26-34. doi: 10.1111/anae.12490.
PMID: 24303858BACKGROUNDMcIsaac DI, MacDonald DB, Aucoin SD. Frailty for Perioperative Clinicians: A Narrative Review. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1450-1460. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004602.
PMID: 32384334BACKGROUNDKim DH, Patorno E, Pawar A, Lee H, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ. Measuring Frailty in Administrative Claims Data: Comparative Performance of Four Claims-Based Frailty Measures in the U.S. Medicare Data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 May 22;75(6):1120-1125. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz224.
PMID: 31566201BACKGROUNDKim DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Lipsitz LA, Rockwood K, Avorn J. Measuring Frailty in Medicare Data: Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(7):980-987. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx229.
PMID: 29244057BACKGROUNDHodge W, Horsley T, Albiani D, Baryla J, Belliveau M, Buhrmann R, O'Connor M, Blair J, Lowcock E. The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2007 Apr 24;176(9):1285-90. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060962.
PMID: 17452662BACKGROUNDIroku-Malize T, Kirsch S. Eye Conditions in Older Adults: Cataracts. FP Essent. 2016 Jun;445:17-23.
PMID: 27348528BACKGROUNDOwsley C, McGwin G Jr, Sloane M, Wells J, Stalvey BT, Gauthreaux S. Impact of cataract surgery on motor vehicle crash involvement by older adults. JAMA. 2002 Aug 21;288(7):841-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.7.841.
PMID: 12186601BACKGROUNDHillman, L. Phaco turns 50, <https://www.eyeworld.org/phaco-turns-50> (2017).
BACKGROUNDEke T, Thompson JR. Serious complications of local anaesthesia for cataract surgery: a 1 year national survey in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;91(4):470-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.106005. Epub 2006 Nov 23.
PMID: 17124243BACKGROUNDJefferis JM, Clarke MP, Taylor JP, Brittain KR. Challenges for the cataract surgeon treating people with dementia: a qualitative study exploring anesthetic choices. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep 26;8:1993-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S69388. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25328382BACKGROUNDNorregaard JC, Bernth-Petersen P, Bellan L, Alonso J, Black C, Dunn E, Andersen TF, Espallargues M, Anderson GF. Intraoperative clinical practice and risk of early complications after cataract extraction in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain. Ophthalmology. 1999 Jan;106(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90004-0.
PMID: 9917779BACKGROUNDSharwood PL, Thomas D, Roberts TV. Adverse medical events associated with cataract surgery performed under topical anaesthesia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;36(9):842-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.01924.x.
PMID: 19278479BACKGROUNDStein JD, Grossman DS, Mundy KM, Sugar A, Sloan FA. Severe adverse events after cataract surgery among medicare beneficiaries. Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1716-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
PMID: 21640382BACKGROUNDRocha G, Turner C. Safety of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with oral sedation without anesthetic monitoring. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;42(2):288-94.
PMID: 17392854BACKGROUNDCalifornia Medical Association. CMA calls for investigation into Anthem restricting use of sedation during cataract surgery, <https://www.cmadocs.org/newsroom/news/view/ArticleID/21466/t/CMA-calls-for-investigation-into-Anthem-policy-restricting-use-of-sedation-during-cataract-surgery> (2018).
BACKGROUNDRosenfeld, S. Monitored Anesthesia Care in Cataract Surgery, <https://www.aao.org/eyenet/article/monitored-anesthesia-care-in-cataract-surgery> (2018).
BACKGROUNDDent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PMID: 27039014BACKGROUNDRockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
PMID: 16129869BACKGROUNDFried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PMID: 11253156BACKGROUNDWhitlock EL, Whittington RA. The Frailty Syndrome: Anesthesiologists Must Understand More and Fear Less. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1445-1448. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004789. No abstract available.
PMID: 32384332BACKGROUNDFleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, Davila-Roman VG, Gerhard-Herman MD, Holly TA, Kane GC, Marine JE, Nelson MT, Spencer CC, Thompson A, Ting HH, Uretsky BF, Wijeysundera DN. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Vascular Medicine Endorsed by the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Feb;22(1):162-215. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0025-z. No abstract available.
PMID: 25523415BACKGROUNDAarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):4-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
PMID: 21197565BACKGROUNDGlisson C, Landsverk J, Schoenwald S, Kelleher K, Hoagwood KE, Mayberg S, Green P; Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Assessing the organizational social context (OSC) of mental health services: implications for research and practice. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Mar;35(1-2):98-113. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
PMID: 18085434BACKGROUNDHays, D. G. & Singh, A. A. Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. (Guilford Press, 2012).
BACKGROUNDSaunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
PMID: 29937585BACKGROUNDFrancis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45. doi: 10.1080/08870440903194015.
PMID: 20204937BACKGROUNDNilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
PMID: 25895742BACKGROUNDDamschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
PMID: 19664226BACKGROUNDGuest, G., MacQueen, K. M. & Namey, E., E. Applied Thematic Analysis. (Sage Publications, 2011).
BACKGROUNDMacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K. & Milstein, B. Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis. CAM Journal 10, 31-36, doi:10.1177/1525822x980100020301 (2016).
BACKGROUNDHays, D. G. & Singh, A. A. in Qualitative Inquiry in Clinical and Educational Settings Ch. 10, 292-336 (Guilford Press, 2011).
BACKGROUNDWeiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
PMID: 28851459BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This pilot study was limited by a small sample size and was not powered to detect statistically significant differences between study arms. Recruitment was extended due to external factors and a limited number of participating surgeons with restricted operating days, which constrained enrollment. The study was conducted at a single academic center, limiting generalizability, and some enrolled participants were not randomized due to day-of-surgery external factors, further reducing the sample.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Catherine Chen
- Organization
- University of California, San Francisco
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catherine L Chen, M.D.
University of California, San Francisco
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients, clinicians (operating room nurses, ophthalmologists, and anesthesia staff), and research staff responsible for data collection and analysis will be blinded to the treatment group in order to minimize bias and maximize the validity of results.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2024
First Posted
July 17, 2024
Study Start
June 12, 2024
Primary Completion
May 6, 2025
Study Completion
May 29, 2025
Last Updated
July 9, 2026
Results First Posted
July 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This is a small single center pilot study so we do not plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.