NCT06505161

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the reduction of pain of two different treatments in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients were divided in two groups. The control group will receive DN treatment, and the experimental group will receive PE, both in the lumbar multifidus muscles.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 17, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 17, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 10, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

chronic low back painDry needlingPercutaneous electrolysis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity. Visual analogue scale.

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Scale (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) assesses the intensity of pain

    At baseline, at 1 week after the last intervention, and 6-month follow-up period

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Idex

    At baseline, at 1 week after the last intervention, and 6-month follow-up period

  • Fear of Movement. Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia (TSK-11SV)

    At baseline, at 1 week after the last intervention, and 6-month follow-up period

  • Quality of life. SF-12 Health questionnaire.

    At baseline, at 1 week after the last intervention, and 6-month follow-up period

Study Arms (2)

Dry needling group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The dry needling group will recibe a dry needling treatment with the Hong technique.

Other: Dry needling

Percutaneous electrolysis group

EXPERIMENTAL

The percutaneous electrolysis grupos will recibe a tratement of galvanic current at 1.5mA, with 3-5 impacts, for 3-5 seconds in the low back multifiud muscles.

Other: Percutaneous electrolysis

Interventions

It consists in application of dry needling on active and/or latent TPs in low back multifidus muscles

Dry needling group

It consists in the application of intratissue percutaneous electrolysis with galvanic current as a cathodic flow electrode in the low back multifidus muscles. The intervention will be guided by ultrasound equipment medically certified.

Percutaneous electrolysis group

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Low back pain ≥ 3 months.
  • Age between 30 and 60 years old.
  • Not being receiving other physical therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of specific lumbar pathology.
  • History of previous lumbar surgery.
  • Treatment with corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory or antibiotic medication in recent weeks.
  • Oncological processes, febrile symptoms or thrombophlebitis.
  • Skin conditions.
  • Belonephobia.
  • Pacemaker.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Patients with neurological pathology

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Campus Científico-Tecnológico UAH. Av. de León, 3A

Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28805, Spain

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Ng SK, Urquhart DM, Fitzgerald PB, Cicuttini FM, Hussain SM, Fitzgibbon BM. The Relationship Between Structural and Functional Brain Changes and Altered Emotion and Cognition in Chronic Low Back Pain Brain Changes: A Systematic Review of MRI and fMRI Studies. Clin J Pain. 2018 Mar;34(3):237-261. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000534.

    PMID: 28719509BACKGROUND
  • Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians; American College of Physicians; American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006.

    PMID: 17909209BACKGROUND
  • Matheve T, Hodges P, Danneels L. The Role of Back Muscle Dysfunctions in Chronic Low Back Pain: State-of-the-Art and Clinical Implications. J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 24;12(17):5510. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175510.

    PMID: 37685576BACKGROUND
  • Hodges PW, Danneels L. Changes in Structure and Function of the Back Muscles in Low Back Pain: Different Time Points, Observations, and Mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):464-476. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8827.

    PMID: 31151377BACKGROUND
  • Hu HT, Gao H, Ma RJ, Zhao XF, Tian HF, Li L. Is dry needling effective for low back pain?: A systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11225. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011225.

    PMID: 29952980BACKGROUND
  • Fakontis C, Iakovidis P, Lytras D, Kasimis K, Koutras G, Ntinou SR, Kottaras A, Chatziprodromidou IP, Chatzikonstantinou P, Apostolou T. Efficacy of percutaneous needle electrolysis versus dry needling in musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(5):1033-1046. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220408.

    PMID: 37458028BACKGROUND
  • Valera-Calero JA, Sanchez-Mayoral-Martin A, Varol U. Short-term effectiveness of high- and low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: A pilot study. World J Orthop. 2021 Oct 18;12(10):781-790. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.781. eCollection 2021 Oct 18.

    PMID: 34754834BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dry Needling

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy Modalities

Study Officials

  • Leire Lopez de Calle Sánchez, Grade

    University of Alcala

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Samuel Fernandez Carnero, PhD

    University of Alcala

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Leire Lopez de Calle Sánchez, Grade

CONTACT

Samuel Fernandez Carnero, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
40 sealed opaque envelopes will be prepared. 20 of the envelopes will contain ballots corresponding to the DN control group and 20 to the PE group. Only the examiner who will carry out the intervention will know the group of each participant. The main examiner will be the one who monitors the intervention without knowing which group each participant belongs to.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The subjects will be divided into two groups. The control group will receive DN treatment, and the experimental group will receive PE, both in the lumbar multifidus muscles.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Leire López de Calle Sánchez

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2024

First Posted

July 17, 2024

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

July 1, 2025

Last Updated

July 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations