NCT06502236

Brief Summary

Background: The purpose of the study was to examine the motor imagery ability and its association with pain, functional status, neck awareness and depression levels in individuals with cervical discogenic pain (CDP). Methods: Sixty individuals aged between 18-65 were included in the study. Demographic data was recorded, pain and disability were evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI), motor imagery ability using Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-20 (KVIQ-20) and mental chronometry. Grip strength, cervical muscle endurance, upper limbs functionality, neck awareness and depression levels were assessed using hydraulic hand dynamometer, cervical muscle endurance tests, Upper Extremity Functional Index-15 (UEFI-15), Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire (FreNAQ), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), respectively.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 2, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 5, 2024

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 28, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 17, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

July 7, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

AwarenessEnduranceFunctional StatusMotor ImageryNeckPain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Assessment of Pain Severity

    The 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) developed by Price et al., and The Neck Disability Index (NDI) developed by Vernon et al. were used to evaluate the pain severity and the disability related to neck. On the 10-cm VAS, the first notch is marked 0, and the last notch is marked 10. Zero means no pain, whereas 10 means the most severe pain.

    February 2024

  • Assessment of Neck Disability

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) developed by Vernon et al. was used to evaluate the disability caused by chronic neck pain. Validated for reliability in Turkish by Aslan et al., the questionnaire is made up of 10 questions questioning the impact of neck pain on daily activities including personal care, concentration, working, driving and sleeping. Each question is rated between 0 and 5 with the maximum score being 50. 0 to 4 points means no disability, 5 to 14 points means mild disability, 14 to 24 points means moderate disability, 25 to 34 points means serious disability, 35 and above means complete disability, and 50 points means full disability .

    February 2024

  • Assessment of Motor Imagery Ability

    MI skills of the participants were evaluated with the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-20 (KVIQ-20) developed to determine the extent to which individuals can visualize and sense an imagined movement. Validated for reliability in Turkish by Dilek et al., the questionnaire included 20 movements measuring 10 visual and 10 kinesthetic imagery skills. To perform the assessment, first, the physiotherapist showed the required movement on their own body, and then asked the participant to repeat that movement physically once. Then the participants were asked to imagine the movement and rate the movement for how much it was felt based on its visual clarity. The overall score included the sum of separate scores of kinesthetic imagery skill and visual imagery skill and ranged between 20 and 100. Higher scores indicated higher clarity and intensity of sensation

    February 2024

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Assessment of Grip Strength

    February 2024

  • Assessment of Muscular Endurance-Flexor

    February 2024

  • Assessment of Muscular Endurance-Extensor

    February 2024

  • Assessment of Muscular Endurance-Deep Flexor

    February 2024

  • Assessment of Neck Awareness

    February 2024

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Control Group

The present study was conducted with individuals aged 18 to 65 years with cervical disc herniation, who were suffered from neck pain lasting for at least 3 months, had a resting pain between 3-7 according to the "Visual Analog Scale" \[4\], and could follow the instructions of a physiotherapist. All individuals initially diagnosed as cervical disc lesion either one level or multilevel lesions, as diagnosed by the neurologist and confirmed by MRI imaging. The individuals with disk degeneration without cervical disk herniation, cervical stenosis and cervical spondylosis were excluded. In addition, individuals who had a history of spinal tumor or head trauma, had a spinal deformity or congenital malformation, had a cervical instability and cervical artery dysfunction, underwent any cervical surgery in the preceding 6 months, musculoskeletal disorders and neuromuscular diseases in the upper extremity and shoulders.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The present study was conducted with individuals aged 18 to 65 years with cervical disc herniation, who were suffered from neck pain lasting for at least 3 months, had a resting pain between 3-7 according to the Visual Analog Scale and could follow the instructions of a physiotherapist. All individuals initially diagnosed as cervical disc lesion either one level or multilevel lesions, as diagnosed by the neurologist and confirmed by MRI imaging. The individuals with disk degeneration without cervical disk herniation, cervical stenosis and cervical spondylosis were excluded.

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 to 65 years with cervical disc herniation, who were suffered from neck pain lasting for at least 3 months,
  • Had a resting pain between 3-7 according to the Visual Analog Scale;
  • Could follow the instructions of a physiotherapist.

You may not qualify if:

  • The individuals with disk degeneration without cervical disk herniation, cervical stenosis and cervical spondylosis were excluded.
  • In addition, individuals who had a history of spinal tumor or head trauma, had a spinal deformity or congenital malformation, had a cervical instability and cervical artery dysfunction, underwent any cervical surgery in the preceding 6 months, musculoskeletal disorders and neuromuscular diseases in the upper extremity and shoulders (rotator cuff tear, very severe myofascial pain syndrome, cervical facet joint pain, carpal tunnel disease, etc.)
  • Who were not able to follow the instructions of the therapist were excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sarıkaya Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation High School

Yozgat, Sarıkaya, 66100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005.

    PMID: 21856077BACKGROUND
  • undefined

    BACKGROUND
  • Wang C, Laiwalla A, Salamon N, Ellingson BM, Holly LT. Compensatory brainstem functional and structural connectivity in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy by probabilistic tractography and functional MRI. Brain Res. 2020 Dec 15;1749:147129. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147129. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

  • Suica Z, Platteau-Waldmeier P, Koppel S, Schmidt-Trucksaess A, Ettlin T, Schuster-Amft C. Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e023439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439.

  • Javdaneh N, Molayei F, Kamranifraz N. Effect of adding motor imagery training to neck stabilization exercises on pain, disability and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic neck pain. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;42:101263. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101263. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

  • Lebon F, Guillot A, Collet C. Increased muscle activation following motor imagery during the rehabilitation of the anterior cruciate ligament. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012 Mar;37(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s10484-011-9175-9.

  • Dere T, Yurdakul G, Bugra Kilinc S, Alemdaroglu-Gurbuz I. Association Between Motor Imagery Ability and Pain, Functional Status, Neck Awareness, and Depression in Individuals with Chronic Neck Pain. Altern Ther Health Med. 2025 Mar;31(2):23-29.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck PainIntervertebral Disc DisplacementPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesHerniaPathological Conditions, Anatomical

Study Officials

  • Tuğba Dere, MSc

    Yozgat Bozok University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Yozgat Bozok University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2024

First Posted

July 16, 2024

Study Start

January 2, 2024

Primary Completion

May 5, 2024

Study Completion

May 28, 2024

Last Updated

July 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations