PillSense for Suspected Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
BLEED
Usage of Novel Blood Sensing Capsule in Emergency Department to Triage Patients With Suspected Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel blood sensing capsule (PillSense), to help emergency doctors better evaluate if patients have active upper digestive tract bleeding, to determine if they can be discharged safely. The PillSense System consists of the PillSense Capsule, a small single use capsule that is safe for human consumption and PillSense Receiver, an external real-time monitor for data display to detect the presence of bleeding in the upper digestive tract within 10 minutes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedDecember 10, 2024
December 1, 2024
1.5 years
July 6, 2024
December 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Discharge rate of patients with stable UGIB who can be triaged home safely after ED visit
To compare the percentage of patients who are safely discharged from ED visit with the usage of PillSense, compared to standard treatment.
1.5 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Risk of clinical rebleeding after a negative PillSense reading
1.5 years
Discharge rate of patients who can be triaged home using PillSense , compared to conventional clinical scoring system like Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS).
1.5 years
Number of inpatient beds saved from this arrangement
1.5 years
Risk of patient morbidity after a negative PillSense reading
1.5 years
Risk of patient mortality after a negative PillSense reading
1.5 years
Study Arms (2)
PillSense group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the PillSense arm will swallow one PillSense capsule. Participants who have blood detected will be admitted with a scheduled oesophagogastroduodenoscopy within 72 hours. Participants with no blood detected will be discharged with medications and a scheduled OGD within 96 hours.
Standard group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants randomized to the standard arm will follow standard of care and will either be admitted or discharged with medications and to undergo an oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) within 72 hours if admitted or 96 hours if discharged.
Interventions
The PillSense System consists of the PillSense Capsule, a small single use capsule that is safe for human consumption and PillSense Receiver, an external real-time monitor for data display. The PillSense Capsule is a minimally invasive, single use medical device designed to detect the presence of bleeding in the upper digestive tract, to aid with patient care. The PillSense Receiver collects and displays real-time information gathered by the PillSense Capsule within 10 minutes. The PillSense Receiver interprets the data and displays a result message "Blood detected" or "No blood detected".
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females aged 21 years and above and are able to give consent.
- Patients who are willing and able to comply with the study protocol (including undergoing endoscopy)
- Presented to Emergency Department with symptoms of acute overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding such as coffee ground vomiting and melena (but without melaena on physical examination)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had hemodynamic shock (systolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg and pulse rate over 120/min)
- Patients who presented with fresh hematemesis, hematochezia and/or melaena
- Patients requiring urgent endoscopy / surgery at time of review or already planned for admission by ED physician for non UGIB related indications
- Patients who had conditions that might contraindicate the use of an ingestible capsule, such as capsule endoscopy (eg. Dysphagia, odynophagia, swallowing disorder, and/or Zenker's diverticulum, issues with the motility of the gastrointestinal tract, Crohn's disease, previous GI surgery, suspected ileus, bowel obstruction and/or perforation)
- Patients with a known history of oesophageal or gastric varices
- Patients with known UGI pathology (such as oesophageal/gastric cancer), or recent (within 3 months) upper GI ulcer bleeding, upper GI surgeries or procedures
- Patients who are on anticoagulation
- Patients with cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED)
- Patients who had altered mental status
- Pregnant and/or lactating women (Female patients below age 60, without history of hysterectomy or are not documented to be post-menopausal, will be given a urine pregnancy test to confirm they are not pregnant)
- Patients who have an MRI investigation planned within 2 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tan Tock Seng Hospitallead
- EnteraSense Limitedcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, Singapore
Related Publications (19)
Gleeson F, Clarke E, Lennon J, MacMathuna R, Crowe J. Outcome of accident and emergency room triaged patients with low risk non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Ir Med J. 2006 Apr;99(4):114-7.
PMID: 16972584BACKGROUNDOwensby S, Taylor K, Wilkins T. Diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):134-45. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140153.
PMID: 25567834BACKGROUNDBiecker E, Heller J, Schmitz V, Lammert F, Sauerbruch T. Diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Feb;105(5):85-94. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0085. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
PMID: 19633792BACKGROUNDFerguson CB, Mitchell RM. Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ulster Med J. 2006 Jan;75(1):32-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 16457402BACKGROUNDRockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):222-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6999.222.
PMID: 7627034BACKGROUNDRockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996 Mar;38(3):316-21. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.3.316.
PMID: 8675081BACKGROUNDZimmerman J, Meroz Y, Arnon R, Tsvang E, Siguencia J. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized patients with secondary upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. J Intern Med. 1995 Mar;237(3):331-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1995.tb01183.x.
PMID: 7891055BACKGROUNDSchembre DB, Ely RE, Connolly JM, Padhya KT, Sharda R, Brandabur JJ. Semiautomated Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score helps direct bed placement for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;7(1):e000479. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000479.
PMID: 33214231BACKGROUNDFisher L, Fisher A, Pavli P, Davis M. Perioperative acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in older patients with hip fracture: incidence, risk factors and prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb 1;25(3):297-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03187.x. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
PMID: 17217452BACKGROUNDSengupta N. Integrating Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Scores into Clinical Practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov;114(11):1699-1703. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000417. No abstract available.
PMID: 31592783BACKGROUNDSachdev MS, Leighton JA, Fleischer DE, Heigh RI, Hara AK, Post JA, Erickson PJ, Sharma VK. A prospective study of the utility of abdominal radiographs after capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of capsule retention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Nov;66(5):894-900. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.06.066.
PMID: 17963875BACKGROUNDRezapour M, Amadi C, Gerson LB. Retention associated with video capsule endoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1157-1168.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
PMID: 28069475BACKGROUNDFernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Gonzalez B, Pons V, Caunedo A, Valle J, Redondo-Cerezo E, Lopez-Higueras A, Valdes M, Menchen P, Fernandez P, Munoz-Navas M, Jimenez J, Herrerias JM. Incidence, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic approaches of capsule endoscopy-related adverse events in a large study population. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015 Dec;107(12):745-52. doi: 10.17235/reed.2015.3820/2015.
PMID: 26671587BACKGROUNDLiao Z, Gao R, Xu C, Li ZS. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031.
PMID: 20152309BACKGROUNDLim YJ, Lee OY, Jeen YT, Lim CY, Cheung DY, Cheon JH, Ye BD, Song HJ, Kim JS, Do JH, Lee KJ, Shim KN, Chang DK, Park CH, Jang BI, Moon JS, Chun HJ, Choi MG, Kim JO; Korean Gut Image Study Group. Indications for Detection, Completion, and Retention Rates of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Based on the 10-Year Data from the Korean Capsule Endoscopy Registry. Clin Endosc. 2015 Sep;48(5):399-404. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.399. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
PMID: 26473123BACKGROUNDRondonotti E, Soncini M, Girelli C, Ballardini G, Bianchi G, Brunati S, Centenara L, Cesari P, Cortelezzi C, Curioni S, Gozzini C, Gullotta R, Lazzaroni M, Maino M, Mandelli G, Mantovani N, Morandi E, Pansoni C, Piubello W, Putignano R, Schalling R, Tatarella M, Villa F, Vitagliano P, Russo A, Conte D, Masci E, de Franchis R; AIGO, SIED and SIGE Lombardia. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov;22(11):1380-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283352ced.
PMID: 20173646BACKGROUNDNemeth A, Wurm Johansson G, Nielsen J, Thorlacius H, Toth E. Capsule retention related to small bowel capsule endoscopy: a large European single-center 10-year clinical experience. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Aug;5(5):677-686. doi: 10.1177/2050640616675219. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
PMID: 28815031BACKGROUNDThorndal C, Selnes O, Lei II, Koulaouzidis A. A systematic review of capsule aspiration in capsule endoscopy. Ann Transl Med. 2024 Feb 1;12(1):12. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-763. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
PMID: 38304904BACKGROUNDMehta CR, Pocock SJ. Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: a practical guide with examples. Stat Med. 2011 Dec 10;30(28):3267-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.4102. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
PMID: 22105690BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Ng Wee Khoon
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2024
First Posted
July 15, 2024
Study Start
July 18, 2024
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share