Management of Postspinal Anesthesia Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section: Baby Norepinephrine Versus Ephedrine
1 other identifier
interventional
196
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Hypotension remains the most common complication which threats both mother and child. The common method of treating hypotension includes fluid loading and the use of vasopressors such as ephedrine and phenylephrine. One promising approach is the administration of diluted norepinephrine. It presents a good alternative to preserve maternal blood pressure while minimizing adverse effects on the mother and fetus. Thus, our study proposes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diluted norepinephrine boluses compared with ephedrine on the management of post- spinal anesthesia hypotension during scheduled cesarean sections. Patients and methods : After local Ethical Commitee approval, this prospective randomized double -blind study will be undertaken from August to October 2024 in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care and Gynecology and Obstetric department of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis. After obtaining informed written consent, singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be randomly divided into two groups. Group N : patients receive norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Group E : parturients receive ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotension. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure are monitored. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of vasopressor boluses used in each group are recorded and considered as the primary outcomes of the study. Complication during the surgery as incidence of hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting are recorded. We also record neonatal APGAR score at 1 minute and five minutes. These parameters are considered as the secondary outcomes of the study. Statistical study: Data entry and analysis will be performed by SPSS software version 25.0. We will use Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. Continuous quantitative variables following a normal distribution will be expressed by their means and standard deviation. Categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages. Analytical study: We'll use the Pearson chi2 test or Fischer's exact test, whichever appropriate, for the comparison of categorical variables. T test of Student and Mann Whitney U-test will be employed for comparing Continuous variables. We 'll retain a significance threshold for p less than 5%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 25, 2025
CompletedApril 23, 2026
April 1, 2026
5 months
June 13, 2024
April 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
number of boluses of vasopressor during surgery
number of boluses of norepinephrine in Group N and number of boluses of ephedrine in Group E, to maintain systolic blood pressure more than 80% of the baseline
number of boluses in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Incidence of hypertension
number of hypertension in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of tachycardia
number of tachycardia in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of bradycardia
number of bradycardia in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of nausea and vomiting
the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Neonatal APGAR score
the first hour
Study Arms (2)
Group E: ephedrine
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup E : parturients will received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotention (systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline).
Group N: norepinephrine
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup N : patients will received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline
Interventions
injection of prophylactic norepinephrinebolus after spinal anesthesia induction. If hypotension at any time during surgery, administration of rescue bolus of the same vasopressor to each patient.
injection of prophylactic ephedrine If hypotension at any time during surgery, administration of rescue bolus of the same vasopressor to each patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Singleton full-term consenting pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Any parturient falling in the category ASA grade III and IV, contrindications to spinal anesthesia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric illness are non included.
- They are excluded the case of failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion to general anesthesia, post-partum bleeding, and failure to follow protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Charles Nicolle Hospital
Tunis, Tunis Governorate, 1006, Tunisia
Related Publications (8)
Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Giacobbe A, Priola V, Maggio Savasta L, Guzzo M, De Vivo D, Mancuso A. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Oct;23(10):1114-8. doi: 10.3109/14767050903572158.
PMID: 20088721BACKGROUNDSklebar I, Bujas T, Habek D. SPINAL ANAESTHESIA-INDUCED HYPOTENSION IN OBSTETRICS: PREVENTION AND THERAPY. Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(Suppl 1):90-95. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.13.
PMID: 31741565BACKGROUNDMercier FJ, Bonnet MP, De la Dorie A, Moufouki M, Banu F, Hanaf A, Edouard D, Roger-Christoph S. [Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):688-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 27. French.
PMID: 17590565BACKGROUNDNgan Kee WD, Khaw KS. Vasopressors in obstetrics: what should we be using? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;19(3):238-43. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192816.22989.ba.
PMID: 16735804BACKGROUNDHeesen M, Stewart A, Fernando R. Vasopressors for the treatment of maternal hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: past, present and future. Anaesthesia. 2015 Mar;70(3):252-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13007. Epub 2015 Jan 13. No abstract available.
PMID: 25583307BACKGROUNDMohta M, Dubey M, Malhotra RK, Tyagi A. Comparison of the potency of phenylephrine and norepinephrine bolus doses used to treat post-spinal hypotension during elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 May;38:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
PMID: 30685301BACKGROUNDAli Elnabtity AM, Selim MF. Norepinephrine versus Ephedrine to Maintain Arterial Blood Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Double-blinded Trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):92-97. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_204_17.
PMID: 29628561BACKGROUNDReynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jul;60(7):636-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x.
PMID: 15960713RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alia Jebri, MD
Charles Nicolle Hospital Tunis
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A total of 196 parturienst are randomly divided into two equal groups by an investigator not directly linked to the study. Groupe N : patients are received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Groupe E : parturients are received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotention. The syringes will be labeled as syringe A and syringe B and the anesthesiologist who will give the bolus cannot know if it is ephedrine or norepinephrine.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of anesthesia and intensive care departement
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2024
First Posted
July 12, 2024
Study Start
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 10, 2025
Study Completion
January 25, 2025
Last Updated
April 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share