Co-administration of IVM and ALB in School-based Deworming in Uganda
FACE-ITpilot
The Feasibility and Acceptability of the Co-administration of Ivermectin and Albendazole vs Albendazole Alone, in the Frame of Mass Drug Administration to School-aged Children in Uganda: A Small-scale Implementation Pilot Study
1 other identifier
observational
8,767
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this small-scale implementation research pilot study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the co-administration of ivermectin (IVM) and albendazole (ALB) compared to albendazole alone during school-based mass drug administration in Uganda. The study will target up to 10,000 school-aged children from 20 schools in Kabale and Kisoro districts in South-Western Uganda. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How feasible is the introduction of co-administered IVM plus ALB in the routine school-based deworming campaign in terms of training, material and processes?
- How well do beneficiary communities (pupils, parents) and implementers (teachers, health workers) accept the new treatment scheme and what are potential barriers and enablers for uptake?
- What are common implementation-related costs that can inform the methodology to estimate monetary and non-monetary costs as well as performance of the two treatment arms for the future cost-effectiveness analysis? The study employs a cross-sectional mixed-method design (we will collect qualitative and quantitative data) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of co-administering IVM and ALB versus ALB alone in routine school-based mass drug administration. Assessments will take place during and after the drug distribution to document the implementation process and evaluate experiences made by the different stakeholders (e.g. children, parents, teachers, health workers):
- The implementation activities start with a training of all implementers at district level who will also undergo a pre- and post-training knowledge assessment.
- Schoolchildren aged 5-14 years will receive a single dose of ALB alone or co-administered ALb (400mg) and IVM (200µg/kg; as determined by height category on a dose pole) by health workers at school. 1-2 weeks post-distribution a subsample of 19 children per school will be invited to answer to questionnaires administered by social science researchers.
- Implementers will administer the treatments and document all distribution-related aspects during the campaign under supervision of the routine staff. Researchers will conduct additional monitoring and evaluation in order to assure data quality and provide support in performance assessment and cost evaluation.
- Beneficiaries (parents) and implementers will be asked to take part in focus group discussions and questionnaire interviews one week after the drug distribution.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 19, 2024
CompletedDecember 20, 2024
December 1, 2024
15 days
June 26, 2024
December 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of IVM + ALB introduction
Feasibility will be assessed using quantitative and qualitative data sources for the following performance and process indicators: * Reported therapeutic coverage (proportion) * Programme reach (proportion) * Compliance rate (children that ingested drugs divided by the total number of children who got offered the drugs) * Reasons for not offering the drugs (non-eligibility) * Reasons for not swallowing the drugs (refusal) * Reported safety: Number, type and severity of adverse events recorded * Incremental time needs for IVM-ALB co-administration * Additional training needs * Incremental staff needs * Drug logistics (tablet balance) Short and structured training evaluation questionnaires will be administered to teachers and health workers directly after training and cover aspects on (i) drug dosing including dose-pole utilization, (ii) identification of non-eligible populations, (iii) documentation processes and (iv) drug information (including safety)
Documentation before, during and up to 12 weeks after the drug distribution
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Acceptability and barriers & enablers to introduction of IVM-ALB co-administration (recipient perspective)
1-2 weeks after drug distribution
Potential incremental costs related to IVM-ALB co-administration
Documentation before, during and up to 12 weeks after the drug distribution
Acceptability and barriers & enablers to introduction of IVM-ALB co-administration (provider perspective)
1-2 weeks after drug distribution
Study Arms (2)
Albendazole only
Schoolchildren aged 5-14 years of 10 schools randomized to receive the standard deworming treatment of a single dose of albendazole 400mg.
Ivermectin and albendazole
Schoolchildren aged 5-14 years of 10 schools randomized to receive the combination treatment of a single dose of ivermectin 200ug/kg (according to height category using a dose-pole) plus albendazole 400mg.
Interventions
Single oral dose of Albendazole 400mg tablet
Generic ivermectin 3mg tablets given as a single oral dose of 200ug/kg using a dose-pole (height categories: 90-119 cm: 1 tablet , 120-140 cm: 2 tablets, 141-158 cm: 3 tablets or \> 158 cm: 4 tablets)
Eligibility Criteria
* Study population receiving intervention: All eligible school-aged children (5-14 years) from 20 pre-selected schools present in the school at the day of the treatment campaign, will be treated with the respective single or combination treatment regimen depending on the treatment arm under which the schools fall. * Study population of post-distribution social science study: Subsamples of treated schoolchildren, parents of school-aged children of the respective study schools, teachers involved in distribution, health workers involved in distribution.
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Makerere University, College of Humanities and Social Sciences
Kampala, Uganda
Vector Borne & Neglected Tropical Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health
Kampala, Uganda
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Keiser, Prof.
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- ECOLOGIC OR COMMUNITY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2024
First Posted
July 11, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 16, 2024
Study Completion
October 19, 2024
Last Updated
December 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is a data sharing agreement between Swiss TPH, Uganda MoH and Makerere University in place. Data may be shared with other researchers upon request.