PIEB Compared With CEI on Breakthrough Pain in Nulliparous Women

NCT06494280 | Recruiting DMC

• 1 other identifier: 297\2024 HFH
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 240
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the impact of programmed intermittent bolus epidural analgesia technique on the incidence of breakthrough pain during labor in nulliparous women compared to continuous epidural infusion. Nulliparous women will randomly be divided during labor into two groups; study group will receive mix of Bupivacaine and fentanyl once (bolus) every 60 minutes; the control group will receive continuously the same dose during an hour, until delivery.

Conditions

Breakthrough Pain

Keywords

Nullipara; Term pregnancy; Singleton; Vertex presentation; Latent phase; Maternal request for epidural; Visual analogue scale > 4

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• breakthrough pain

  Incidence of breakthrough pain, defined as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score \> 30. The VAS consists of a 100cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 100 (severe pain).

  48 hours

Secondary Outcomes (26)

• manual bolus (top up)

  48 hours

• Hourly visual analogue scale

  48 hours

• Time to delivery

  48 hours

• Oxytocin augmentation

  48 hours

• Duration of second stage

  48 hours

Study Arms (2)

study group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Epidural analgesia will be maintained by receiving programmed intermittent 10ml bolus of 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2microgram\\ml Fentanyl every one hour, until the delivery is completed, and lacerations are sutured.

Drug: programmed intermittent Bolus epidural analgesia

control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Epidural analgesia will be maintained by receiving 10ml\\h continuous infusion of 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2microgram\\ml Fentanyl until the delivery is completed, and lacerations are sutured.

Drug: continuous epidural infusion

Interventions

programmed intermittent Bolus epidural analgesia DRUG

About 30 minutes after the end of the epidural and administration of the loading dose, the woman will be asked to report her pain level. If the VAS score \<30, the woman will receive the study group protocol for pain maintenance, i.e., a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml of 0.1% bupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl every hour until the completion of labor and suturing of the incision. The participant can add to herself 5 ml of the same solution of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl every 30 minutes. The maximum dose that the parturient is allowed to receive is 20 ml for one hour. If a breakthrough pain appears during labor, a bolus of 10 ml of anesthetic solution with the same concentration will be added. Participants with a VAS score \>30 after 30 minutes of the loading dose will be asked to perform a new epidural (if it was decided that the epidural failed) otherwise her data will not be collected for the final analysis of the study.

Also known as: Bupivacaine + Fentanyl

study group

continuous epidural infusion DRUG

About 30 minutes after the end of the epidural and administration of the loading dose, the woman will be asked to report her pain level. If the VAS score \<30, the woman will receive the control group protocol for pain maintenance, i.e., 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl as a continuous infusion per one hour, until the delivery is completed, and laceration is sutured. The participant can add to herself 5 ml of the same solution of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl every 30 minutes. The maximum dose that the parturient is allowed to receive is 20 ml for one hour. If a breakthrough pain appears during labor, a bolus of 10 ml of anesthetic solution with the same concentration will be added. Participants with a VAS score \>30 after 30 minutes of the loading dose will be asked to perform a new epidural (if it was decided that the epidural failed) otherwise her data will not be collected for the final analysis of the study.

Also known as: Bupivacaine + Fentanyl

control group

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Nulliparous women
• Term pregnancy
• Singleton
• Vertex presentation
• Latent phase (cervical dilatation \<6 cm)
• Epidural analgesia request
• Visual Analogue Scale score \> 40

You may not qualify if:

• Estimated fetal weight \> 4 kg
• Intra uterine fetal death
• Drug sensitivity
• Anomalous fetus
• Contraindication for epidural analgesia

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel: lead

Study Sites (1)

Holy Family Hospital

Nazareth, Israel

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

• 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e208-25. 2. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018:5;CD000331. 3. Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012:3;CD009234. 4. George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2013;116:133-44. 5. Sng BL, Zeng Y, de Souza NNA, Leong WL, Oh TT, Siddiqui FJ, Assam PN, Han NR, Chan ES, Sia AT. Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD011344. 6. Ferrer LE, Romero DJ, Vasquez OI, Matute EC, Van de Velde M. Effect of programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion on labor analgesia and obstetric outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296:915-22. 7. Ojo OA, Mehdiratta JE, Gamez BH, Hunting J, Habib AS. Comparison of programmed intermittent epidural boluses with continuous epidural infusion for the maintenance of labor analgesia: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:426-35. 8. Haidl F, Arne Rosseland L, Rorvik AM, Dahl V. Programmed intermittent boluses vs continuous epidural infusion in labor using an adrenaline containing solution: A randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64:1505-12. 9. Riazanova OV, Alexandrovich YS, Guseva YV, Ioscovich AM. A randomized comparison of low dose ropivacaine programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labour analgesia. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2019;26:25-30. 10. Fan Y, Hou W, Feng S, Mao P, Wang X, Jiang J, Yuan H, Shen X, Feng S, Li P. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus decreases the incidence of intra-partum fever for labor analgesia in primiparous women: a randomized controlled study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300:1551-7 11. Xu J, Zhou J, Xiao H, Pan S, Liu J, Shang Y, Yao S. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing programmed intermittent bolus and continuous infusion as the background infusion for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2583. 12. Wang XX, Zhang XL, Zhang ZX, Xin ZQ, Guo HJ, Liu HY, Xiao J, Zhang YL, Yuan SZ. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in parturients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e28742. 13. Bullingham A, Liang S, Edmonds E, Mathur S, Sharma S. Continuous epidural infusion vs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a prospective, controlled, before-and-after cohort study of labour outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:432-7. 14. Lin Y, Li Q, Liu J, Yang R, Liu J. Comparison of continuous epidural infusion and programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor analgesia. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:1107-12. 15. Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14:305-9. 16. Salim R, Nachum Z, Moscovici R, Lavee M, Shalev E. Continuous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labor and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:301-6. 17. Lim Y, Ocampo CE, Supandji M, Teoh WH, Sia AT. A randomized controlled trial of three patient-controlled epidural analgesia regimens for labor. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1968-72. 18. Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg 2011;113:826-31. 19. Carvalho B, George RB, Cobb B, McKenzie C, Riley ET. Implementation of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for the Maintenance of Labor Analgesia. Anesth Analg 2016;123:965-71 20. Diez-Picazo LD, Guasch E, Brogly N, Gilsanz F. Is breakthrough pain better managed by adding programmed intermittent epidural bolus to a background infusion during labor epidural analgesia? A randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:1097-104. 21. Roofthooft E, Barbé A, Schildermans J, Cromheecke S, Devroe S, Fieuws S, Rex S, Wong CA, Van de Velde M. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus vs. patient-controlled epidural analgesia for maintenance of labour analgesia: a two-centre, double-blind, randomised study. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1635-42. 22. Sultan P, Murphy C, Halpern S, Carvalho B. The effect of low concentrations versus high concentrations of local anesthetics for labour analgesia on obstetric and anesthetic outcomes: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:840-54.

  RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breakthrough Pain

Interventions

Bupivacaine; Fentanyl

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anilides; Amides; Organic Chemicals; Aniline Compounds; Amines; Piperidines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Heterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

• Raed Salim, MD

  Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel

  STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Raed Salim, MD

CONTACT

+972544986960; r.salim@hfhosp.org

Asmaa Masri Esmail, MD

CONTACT

+972544986960; Asmaa.Masri94@gmail.com

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: head of obstetrics and gynecology department

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 2, 2024
• First Posted: July 10, 2024
• Study Start: September 10, 2024
• Primary Completion (Estimated): November 1, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): December 1, 2026
• Last Updated: April 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
• Time Frame: starting 6 months after publication
• Access Criteria: Access to IPD can be requested by qualified researchers and will be granted after review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing agreement. For more information or to apply, please contact the Principal Investigator

Locations

IL (1)